OBJECTIVES: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has been successfully applied to the measurement of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles, providing particle concentrations for total HDL particle number (HDL-P), HDL subclasses (small, medium, large) and weighted, average HDL size for many years. Key clinical studies have demonstrated that NMR-measured HDL-P was more strongly associated with measures of coronary artery disease and a better predictor of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) events than HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C). Recently, an NMR-based clinical analyzer, the Vantera(®), was developed to allow lipoprotein measurements to be performed in the routine, clinical laboratory setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate and report the performance characteristics for HDL-P quantified on the Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Assay performance was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. In order to ensure that quantification of HDL-P on the Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer was similar to the well-characterized HDL-P assay on the NMR profiler, a method comparison was performed. RESULTS: The within-run and within-lab imprecision ranged from 2.0% to 3.9%. Linearity was established within the range of 10.0 to 65.0 μmol/L. The reference intervals were different between men (22.0 to 46.0 μmol/L) and women (26.7 to 52.9 μmol/L). HDL-P concentrations between two NMR platforms, Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer and NMR Profiler, demonstrated excellent correlation (R(2) = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The performance characteristics, as well as the primary tube sampling procedure for specimen analysis on the Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer, suggest that the HDL-P assay is suitable for routine clinical applications.
OBJECTIVES: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has been successfully applied to the measurement of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles, providing particle concentrations for total HDL particle number (HDL-P), HDL subclasses (small, medium, large) and weighted, average HDL size for many years. Key clinical studies have demonstrated that NMR-measured HDL-P was more strongly associated with measures of coronary artery disease and a better predictor of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) events than HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C). Recently, an NMR-based clinical analyzer, the Vantera(®), was developed to allow lipoprotein measurements to be performed in the routine, clinical laboratory setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate and report the performance characteristics for HDL-P quantified on the Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Assay performance was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. In order to ensure that quantification of HDL-P on the Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer was similar to the well-characterized HDL-P assay on the NMR profiler, a method comparison was performed. RESULTS: The within-run and within-lab imprecision ranged from 2.0% to 3.9%. Linearity was established within the range of 10.0 to 65.0 μmol/L. The reference intervals were different between men (22.0 to 46.0 μmol/L) and women (26.7 to 52.9 μmol/L). HDL-P concentrations between two NMR platforms, Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer and NMR Profiler, demonstrated excellent correlation (R(2) = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The performance characteristics, as well as the primary tube sampling procedure for specimen analysis on the Vantera(®) Clinical Analyzer, suggest that the HDL-P assay is suitable for routine clinical applications.
Authors: James D Otvos; John R Guyton; Margery A Connelly; Sydney Akapame; Vera Bittner; Steven L Kopecky; Megan Lacy; Santica M Marcovina; Joseph B Muhlestein; William E Boden Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui; Mark L Van Natta; Margery A Connelly; Raj Vuppalanchi; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; James Tonascia; Cynthia Guy; Rohit Loomba; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Julia Wattacheril; Naga Chalasani; Arun J Sanyal Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Patricia G Wilson; Joel C Thompson; Preetha Shridas; Patrick J McNamara; Maria C de Beer; Frederick C de Beer; Nancy R Webb; Lisa R Tannock Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Laura Durcan; Deborah A Winegar; Margery A Connelly; James D Otvos; Laurence S Magder; Michelle Petri Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Erwin Garcia; Justyna Wolak-Dinsmore; Zeneng Wang; Xinmin S Li; Dennis W Bennett; Margery A Connelly; James D Otvos; Stanley L Hazen; Elias J Jeyarajah Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Trynke van der Boom; Congzhuo Jia; Joop D Lefrandt; Margery A Connelly; Thera P Links; Uwe J F Tietge; Robin P F Dullaart Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Sara Sokooti; Jose L Flores-Guerrero; Lyanne M Kieneker; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Margery A Connelly; Stephan J L Bakker; Robin P F Dullaart Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.958