The synaptotagmin (Syt) family of proteins contains tandem C2 domains, C2A and C2B, which bind membranes in the presence of Ca(2+) to trigger vesicle fusion during exocytosis. Despite recent progress, the role and extent of interdomain interactions between C2A and C2B in membrane binding remain unclear. To test whether the two domains interact on a planar lipid bilayer (i.e., experience thermodynamic interdomain contacts), diffusion of fluorescent-tagged C2A, C2B, and C2AB domains from human Syt7 was measured using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy with single-particle tracking. The C2AB tandem exhibits a lateral diffusion constant approximately half the value of the isolated single domains and does not change when additional residues are engineered into the C2A-C2B linker. This is the expected result if C2A and C2B are separated when membrane-bound; theory predicts that C2AB diffusion would be faster if the two domains were close enough together to have interdomain contact. Stopped-flow measurements of membrane dissociation kinetics further support an absence of interdomain interactions, as dissociation kinetics of the C2AB tandem remain unchanged when rigid or flexible linker extensions are included. Together, the results suggest that the two C2 domains of Syt7 bind independently to planar membranes, in contrast to reported interdomain cooperativity in Syt1.
The synaptotagmin (Syt) family of proteins contains tandem C2 domains, C2A and C2B, which bind membranes in the presence of Ca(2+) to trigger vesicle fusion during exocytosis. Despite recent progress, the role and extent of interdomain interactions between C2A and C2B in membrane binding remain unclear. To test whether the two domains interact on a planar lipid bilayer (i.e., experience thermodynamic interdomain contacts), diffusion of fluorescent-tagged C2A, C2B, and C2AB domains from humanSyt7 was measured using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy with single-particle tracking. The C2AB tandem exhibits a lateral diffusion constant approximately half the value of the isolated single domains and does not change when additional residues are engineered into the C2A-C2B linker. This is the expected result if C2A and C2B are separated when membrane-bound; theory predicts that C2AB diffusion would be faster if the two domains were close enough together to have interdomain contact. Stopped-flow measurements of membrane dissociation kinetics further support an absence of interdomain interactions, as dissociation kinetics of the C2AB tandem remain unchanged when rigid or flexible linker extensions are included. Together, the results suggest that the two C2 domains of Syt7 bind independently to planar membranes, in contrast to reported interdomain cooperativity in Syt1.
The mammaliansynaptotagmin
(Syt) family of proteins consists of 17 isoforms, 8 of which are known
to bind membranes in the presence of Ca2+ and trigger membrane
fusion events.[1−4] These proteins function as Ca2+ sensors for SNARE-dependent
membrane fusion, with differing Ca2+ sensitivities due
to different membrane affinities and kinetics tuned to the Ca2+ concentrations of their respective fusion events.[4] For example, Syt1 binds to and releases from
the membrane rapidly and is involved in fast synchronous neurotransmitter
release, whereas Syt7 has biophysical properties tuned to its roles
in slow asynchronous neurotransmitter release and neuroendocrine secretion.[5−8]Syt consists of a transmembrane helix near the N-terminus,
a flexible
region of variable length, and two C2 domains joined by a short linker
(Figure 1).[9] Each
C2 domain contains 8 antiparallel β-strands arranged in a compact
β-barrel; in Ca2+-binding Syt isoforms, the C2A domain
binds three Ca2+ ions and the C2B domain binds two (Syt1)
or three (Syt7).[3,10,11] The transmembrane helix anchors the protein in the membrane; Syt1
is anchored in secretory vesicle membranes, whereas Syt7 is found
on either the plasma membrane or secretory vesicles, depending on
cell type.[12] The two C2 domains trigger
membrane fusion upon binding Ca2+ and associating peripherally
with vesicular and/or plasma membranes.[5] Although the length between the transmembrane helix and the C2A
domain is highly variable among the isoforms, the linker length between
the C2A and C2B domains is conserved as 7 or 8 residues.[1,4] Recently, it was shown that the insertion of long polyproline extensions
to the C2A–C2B linker alters the kinetics of Syt1-triggered
neurotransmitter release, suggesting that the relative orientation
and/or interactions between the two domains are important for physiological
function.[13]
Figure 1
Protein constructs used
in this study. (A) Composite of published
structures from Syt7 C2A (PDB ID: 2D8K) and Syt7 C2B (PDB ID: 3N5A)[11] joined by the native 7-residue linker sequence. Ca2+- and membrane-binding loops are shown in pink. The domain
orientation shown here represents a relatively extended linker conformation
and is intended for illustration purposes only. (B) Schematic of constructs
used in this study, with C2A-C2B linker sequences indicated below
each cartoon. The native linker sequence is shown in black, and engineered
insertions are in red. Hashed boxes represent the 11-amino acid sequence
DSLEFIASKLA, used for enzymatic labeling with
fluorophore at the underlined serine.[30]
Protein constructs used
in this study. (A) Composite of published
structures from Syt7 C2A (PDB ID: 2D8K) and Syt7C2B (PDB ID: 3N5A)[11] joined by the native 7-residue linker sequence. Ca2+- and membrane-binding loops are shown in pink. The domain
orientation shown here represents a relatively extended linker conformation
and is intended for illustration purposes only. (B) Schematic of constructs
used in this study, with C2A-C2B linker sequences indicated below
each cartoon. The native linker sequence is shown in black, and engineered
insertions are in red. Hashed boxes represent the 11-amino acid sequence
DSLEFIASKLA, used for enzymatic labeling with
fluorophore at the underlined serine.[30]Both Syt C2 domains bind to membranes
containing anionic lipids
in the presence of sufficient Ca2+ and contribute to tight
Syt membrane binding.[14−16] Syt C2AB tandem domains have the ability to dock
either to the same membrane or to opposing membranes, depending on
the experimental system.[17−19] Brunger and colleagues have shown
that within the Syt1 C2AB tandem the C2 domains orient randomly relative
to each other in solution.[20] Upon interacting
with SNARE complexes, C2AB adopts a more restricted ensemble of relative
C2 domain orientations, which is hypothesized to facilitate simultaneous
binding of the two domains to the plasma membrane.[20]Two sets of observations suggest that the two C2
domains of Syt1
co-penetrate target membranes cooperatively, suggesting possible interactions
between C2A and C2B during membrane binding.[21,22] First, EPR depth measurements show that both Syt1 C2A and C2B penetrate
membranes more deeply in the context of the C2AB tandem than they
do as isolated individual domains.[21] Second,
fluorescence measurements similarly demonstrate a deeper membrane
penetration of Syt1C2B in the context of the C2AB tandem relative
to the isolated domain, even when the C2AB tandem is mutated so that
C2A cannot bind Ca2+.[22] These
observations suggest that C2AB membrane binding may involve some sort
of favorable thermodynamic interaction between the two domains, which
would allow the C2AB tandem to overcome barriers to deep membrane
insertion experienced by individual domains. However, no specific
interdomain interactions have been reported.The purpose of
this study is to gain insight into the membrane-bound
structure of Syt C2AB using a recently developed analytical approach
based on diffusion of peripheral membrane proteins and complexes.
The diffusion of a peripheral protein is determined by the friction
of the portion of protein embedded in the membrane and not on the
portion that is moving through solution, as the viscosity of aqueous
solutions is much lower than that of the membrane bilayer.[23−25] The diffusion constant D is related to a frictional
coefficient f bywhere kB is Boltzmann’s
constant and T is temperature.[26]We and others have shown that the diffusion of multiple
linked,
membrane-bound protein domains can be explained by simple additive
friction among the domains.[25,27,28] For a C2AB tandem, the predicted diffusion constant (Dpred) from this model can be formulated as followswhere DA and DB are the diffusion constants of C2A and C2B,
respectively. This approximation is valid when the two domains are
separated by a minimum distance known as the free draining limit.
Tandem domains are predicted to diffuse faster if the domains are
separated by shorter distances.[29] Here,
we measure such diffusion constants using single-molecule fluorescence
tracking in order to test for additive friction between Syt7 C2A and
C2B in the membrane-bound state. In addition, we use stopped-flow
fluorescence kinetic measurements in an alternative approach to test
for cooperativity and interdomain interaction. Both approaches suggest
independent membrane binding by the two domains without significant
interdomain contact.
Experimental Methods
Materials
1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
(DOPC), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-l-serine (sodium salt) (DOPS), and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(lissamine rhodamine
B sulfonyl) (ammonium salt) (LRB-DOPE) were from Avanti Polar Lipids
(Alabaster, AL); Alexa Fluor 488C2-maleimide and N-[5-(dimethylamino)naphthalene-1-sulfonyl]-1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (dansyl-PE) were from Life
Technologies. 2-Mercaptoethanol (BME) was from Fisher. All reagents
were ACS grade or higher.
DNA Constructs
The C2A, C2B, and
C2AB domains from
humanSyt7 were subcloned from cDNA (IMAGE: 11045721) into a previously
described glutathione S-transferase (GST) expression plasmid with
N-terminal enzymatic labeling recognition sequence.[27,30] Site-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange II XL, Agilent) was used to
insert a unique XhoI restriction site within the C2A–C2B linker,
in a frame chosen to encode two serine residues, using the following
primers: fwd, CAGCGATGGGAGCTCGAGTGGGAGCCGAG;
rev, CTCGGCTCCCACTCGAGCTCCCATCGCTG. In order
to generate the Syt7C2AB-FE4 plasmid, a second round of site-directed
mutagenesis was performed with the following primers: fwd, CAGCGATGGGAGCGGGAGCTCGAGTGGGAG;
rev, CTCCCACTCGAGCTCCCGCTCCCATCGCTG. In order
to generate the Syt7C2AB-FE16 and Syt2C2AB-PP12 plasmids, synthetic
duplex oligonucleotides were ligated into the XhoI-digested plasmid
described above. (FE16: fwd, TCGAGTGGTGGCAGCGGTAGTTCCGGAGGCTCAGGTAGCGGC;
rev, TCGAGCCGCTACCTGAGCCTCCGGAACTACCGCTGCCACCAC;
PP12: fwd, TCGAACCCGCCTCCGCCGCCGCCGCCACCCCCACCTCCACCC;
rev, TCGAGGGTGGAGGTGGGGGTGGCGGCGGCGGCGGAGGCGGGT;
IDT, Coralville, IA) Correct insertion was verified via primer extension
sequencing. Plasmid DNA encoding Sfp phosphopantetheinyl transferase
was a gift from Christopher Walsh (Harvard), and this protein was
expressed and purified as described.[31]
Protein Expression and Purification
Plasmids were transformed
into Escherichia coli BL21 cells for
protein expression. Bacterial suspensions were cultured at 37 °C
until the absorbance at 600 nm reached approximately 0.6, and then
expression was induced by addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and allowed to proceed for
8 h at room temperature. Following lysis, the proteins were purified
using glutathionesepharose affinity columns essentially as previously
described[27,32] and were eluted into labeling buffer (10
mM MgCl2, 50 mM l-glutamic acid, 50 mM l-arginine, 20 mM BME, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) following cleavage of
the N-terminal GST tag with thrombin, leaving GST on the column. Due
to the large positive net charge on Syt proteins, nucleic acid contaminants
have been observed in bacterial preparations;[33] therefore, protein purification procedures incorporated nuclease
digestion and high-salt washes to minimize such contamination.[32] The absence of nucleic acid in purified proteins
was quantified using absorbance measurements on a PerkinElmer λ-650
spectrophotometer, and all purified proteins had an A260/A280 ratio of 0.65 or
lower (Supporting Information, Figure S1).After initial purification, the proteins were enzymatically labeled
with Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) using Sfp phosphopantetheinyl transferase
as described previously.[27,31] The purity of the labeled
protein was determined using SDS-PAGE with fluorescent imaging, and
the C2AB tandem domain preparations were found to contain detectable
amounts of single C2 domain, presumably from hydrolysis at the interdomain
linker. To remove these contaminants and any residual thrombin, the
C2AB tandem domains were further purified over a Superdex G75 10/300
GL gel filtration column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) in buffer
A (150 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, pH
7.4) with 500 mM NaCl added, and purity was determined using SDS-PAGE
(Figure 2). The purified proteins were flash-frozen
in buffer A, with 8% glycerol and 20 mM BME added to tandem domain
preparations to aid in protein stability. Diffusion data for individual
protein domains are from a single purified batch of protein. Each
tandem domain was purified and labeled twice, with indistinguishable
results between the two batches.
Figure 2
Purity of tandem domain species for TIRFM
experiments. AF488-labeled
Syt7 C2AB domain variants (expected mass: 34–35 kDa) were purified
using gel filtration chromatography in order to remove cleavage products
and analyzed using SDS-PAGE. The gel includes the BenchMark fluorescent
protein ladder (Life Technologies) and was imaged under ultraviolet
excitation.
Purity of tandem domain species for TIRFM
experiments. AF488-labeled
Syt7 C2AB domain variants (expected mass: 34–35 kDa) were purified
using gel filtration chromatography in order to remove cleavage products
and analyzed using SDS-PAGE. The gel includes the BenchMark fluorescent
protein ladder (Life Technologies) and was imaged under ultraviolet
excitation.
Lipid Preparation
Synthetic phospholipids were combined
in chloroform at the desired molar ratio. After evaporation of the
chloroform, the lipid films were dried under vacuum for ≥2
h, reconstituted in buffer A containing 20 mM BME to a concentration
of 3 mM total lipid, and sonicated on ice 4 min (intervals of 1 s
separated by 2 s pauses) using a Sonics Vibra-Cell probe sonicator
to yield small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs).[24] Diffusion data are averages among measurements performed over 10
days of experiments, with a fresh batch of liposomes prepared for
each.
Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy
Glass
coverslips (25 mm × 25 mm, no. 1.5, VWR) were rinsed in freshly
drawn Milli-Q water, soaked in 3:1 H2SO4 to
30% aqueous H2O2 for 1 h to clean and etch the
glass surface, rinsed extensively in Milli-Q water, and dried under
a stream of N2 gas. Perfusion chambers (Life Technologies,
60 μL volume) were rinsed in Milli-Q water, bath-sonicated at
room temperature for 1 h in a 20% ethanol/water solution, dried under
a stream of N2, and adhered to the coverslips. SUVs containing
3:1 mixture of DOPC/DOPS with approximately 1 to 5 ppb LRB-DOPE were
diluted 1:1 into buffer A containing 1 M NaCl and introduced to the
perfusion chambers to form supported lipid bilayers (SLBs). After
30 min, SLBs were rinsed with ∼20 mL Milli-Q water and exchanged
into buffer A containing 200 μM CaCl2.[24] In a subset of experiments, decreasing the Ca2+ concentration to 10 μM was found not to influence
diffusion constants, whereas addition of 2 mM EDTA removed nearly
all protein from the membrane (Figure S2).Samples were imaged using an Axio Observer total internal
reflection fluorescence microscope (TIRFM) with a 100×, 1.46
NA objective (Zeiss, Germany), with illumination from a 50 mW 488
nm laser and 20 mW 552 nm laser (Intelligent Imaging Innovations,
Denver, CO). First, movies of the LRB-DOPE were imaged at 552 nm to
verify bilayer fluidity and at 488 nm to verify negligible levels
of fluorescent contaminants. AF488-tagged Syt7C2A, Syt7C2B, Syt7C2AB
WT, Syt7C2AB-FE4, or Syt7C2AB-FE16 was then added to the bilayers
at 10–100 pM, allowed to equilibrate to room temperature (20–24
°C) for 5 min, and imaged with 488 nm excitation for single-particle
tracking. All movies were acquired with an Evolve 512 × 512 EMCCD
camera (Photometrics) for 500 frames at 19.8 frames/s (exposure time
of 50.0 ms, with a frame transfer time of 0.4 ms). For each sample,
three movies of LRB-DOPE and five movies of AF488-labeled protein
were acquired on different regions of the bilayer.
Single-Particle
Tracking and Diffusion Analysis
The
LRB-DOPE movies were exported from Slidebook 5.5 as TIFF stacks and
imported into ImageJ for tracking analysis using the Particle Tracker
plugin as described.[24] The AF488–protein
images were tracked in Slidebook 5.5 using a Laplacian transformation
to enhance contrast and a mask to filter background noise and keep
only fluorescent objects that persisted for at least five frames.
Centroid positions of particles were defined on the basis of the intensity
distributions of the original untransformed images.All trajectory
data were exported as text files for subsequent analysis in Mathematica
(Wolfram Research). Each text file was filtered to exclude trajectories
fewer than 5 frames in length. Except where otherwise noted, steps
from all trajectories in each movie were pooled, and statistical analysis
was performed on the combined pool of steps. Spurious detections were
removed with filters to identify unusually bright or immobile particles,
likely from contaminants or rapidly dissociating particles.Subsequently, the bin was analyzed using methods developed by Schütz
et al. for one and two components.[24,34] For each movie,
the cumulative probability distribution 1 – P(r2, Δt) of the
square displacement r2 or greater over
a given time interval Δt was calculated for
Δt values from three to eight frames, using r2 values of 0.2 μm2 or larger
in order to exclude immobile contaminants. Single-component fits are
given by eq 3where m is the mobile fraction
and ⟨r2⟩ is the mean-square
displacement (MSD). For tandem domains, data were also fit to a two-component
modelwhere α is the fraction of particles
in the slow-diffusing state, ⟨r12⟩ is the
MSD of the slow-diffusing state, and ⟨r22⟩ was constrained
to the expected MSD for a fast-diffusing state with a D of 1.8 μm2/s, corresponding to D for a single C2 domain (Table 1).
Table 1
Diffusion Parameters of Syt7 C2 Species
species
D (μm2/s)a
major diffusing population
(%)a,b
fast-diffusing population (%)a,b
n
C2A
1.82 ± 0.12
10
C2B
1.82 ± 0.08
14
C2AB-WT
0.99 ± 0.06
83 ± 5
15 ± 4
8
C2AB-FE4
1.03 ± 0.07
87 ± 6
11 ± 6
9
C2AB-FE16
1.00 ± 0.07
93 ± 2
5 ± 2
8
Dpred
0.91 ± 0.08c
Mean ± 95% CI among n independent
samples (supported bilayers) are reported.
From two-component fits to C2AB
tandem domain species. D from the major component
is reported here. Populations total less than 100% due to the presence
of a small population (∼2%) of immobile particles.
Dpred was
calculated using eq 2 and propagating
error from DC2A and DC2B.
Mean ± 95% CI among n independent
samples (supported bilayers) are reported.From two-component fits to C2AB
tandem domain species. D from the major component
is reported here. Populations total less than 100% due to the presence
of a small population (∼2%) of immobile particles.Dpred was
calculated using eq 2 and propagating
error from DC2A and DC2B.The MSD
is linearly related to Δt as described
by eq 5where D is
the measured two-dimensional diffusion constant and till is the illumination time (50 ms).[35] Finally, the trajectory-by-trajectory distribution of diffusion
constants was analyzed for selected movies by fitting the probability
density to a Lorentzian distribution or the sum of two Lorentzian
distributions (eq 6 or 7)where D1 and D2 are the characteristic diffusion
constants,
ϒ are scale parameters of the Lorentzian
distributions, and α are normalization
and scaling factors for the components.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed
in Mathematica. First, in order to determine whether the variability
between bilayers was statistically significant, one-way ANOVA was
performed comparing diffusion constants of Syt7C2AB-WT from eight
different supported bilayers acquired on three different days, on
which five movies were acquired per bilayer sample. The variability
between bilayers was statistically significant compared to the variability
between movies from the same bilayer (P < 0.001).
Therefore, for all subsequent analysis, the diffusion constants calculated
from the five movies on each bilayer were averaged and recorded as
the diffusion constant from that sample.
Stopped-Flow Spectroscopy
Stopped-flow fluorescence
kinetic measurements were performed on a BioLogic SFM-3000 (Knoxville,
TN) using 284 nm excitation and a 455 nm long-pass emission filter.
C2 domains (0.5 μM) bound to SUVs containing 3:1 DOPC/DOPS and
5% dansyl-PE (100 μM total accessible lipid) in the presence
of 200 μM CaCl2 were rapidly mixed with a solution
containing 1 mM EDTA (all concentrations listed are after mixing).
The observed kinetics correspond to a loss of protein-to-membrane
FRET upon membrane dissociation as described.[36] Data were fit using Mathematica to either a single-exponential decay
(eq 8) or a two-step model (eq 9)where koff is
a dissociation rate constant, k1 and k2 are rate constants of two sequential steps
in which a fluorescence change is observed only after both steps occur,
ΔFmax is the amplitude of the fluorescence
change, and C is an offset.
Results
Protein Purification
and Fluorescent Labeling
Individual
and tandem domains from Syt7 were purified and tagged with fluorophore,
and their lateral diffusion constants were measured on supported lipid
bilayers composed of a 3:1 mixture of DOPC and DOPS, a simplified
approximation of the anionic lipid content of the plasma and/or secretory
vesicle membranes to which Syt C2 domains bind.[37−39] In order to
accurately predict tandem domain diffusion constants using eq 2, it is necessary to precisely measure diffusion
constants for the individual species. Syt7 was chosen for this study,
rather than the better-studied isoform Syt1, because the membrane-bound
lifetime of the Syt1 C2A domain was too short for accurate diffusion
measurements on these membranes (Supporting Information, Movie S1). However, both individual and tandem C2 domains from
Syt7 remained visible for tracking for up to several seconds.Each C2 domain or C2AB tandem was expressed as a GST fusion, purified
using glutathione affinity chromatography, and eluted following cleavage
of the N-terminal GST tag with thrombin. The purified proteins were
verified to be free of contaminating nucleic acids, which have been
found to alter membrane-binding properties of synaptotagmins.[33] Each protein species contained an 11-residue
N-terminal recognition sequence for Sfp phosphopantheinyltransferase,
which was used for enzymatic fluorescent labeling with AF488.[27,30] The purification and labeling procedure produced tandem domains
free of detectable fluorescent protein contaminants using SDS-PAGE
with fluorescence imaging (Figure 2). On the
basis of the dilution factors necessary to achieve an adequate density
of fluorescent spots in the single-molecule experiments, the concentrations
of purified fluorescent tandem domains are estimated to be ∼100
nM. A significant advantage of single-molecule detection is the ability
to work with picomolar concentrations of multidomain proteins.
Lipid
Diffusion as an Internal Standard for Bilayer Fluidity
In
order to ensure uniformity in bilayer fluidity among protein
diffusion samples, lissamine rhodamine-DOPE (LRB-DOPE) was used as
a qualitative internal standard in each supported bilayer prepared.
Inclusion of ∼5 ppb LRB-DOPE in the bilayers provided enough
fluorescent lipid for qualitative measurements of lipid diffusion
without inducing significant spectral bleed-through to the AF488 channel
used for protein diffusion measurements. This is a much lower particle
density than the ∼150 ppb we have used for lipid diffusion
measurements in previous reports and therefore the diffusion constants
so measured are inherently less precise than those from our previous
reports and our current protein diffusion measurements. Nevertheless,
the lipid diffusion constants generally ranged from 2.2 to 3.0 μm2/s, consistent with fluid bilayers as reported previously.[24,27] Rare samples with lipid diffusion constants outside this range were
discarded. We also note a second population of LRB-DOPE present in
all coverslips that visibly diffuses extremely slowly and comprises
approximately half of the total fluorescent lipid (Movie S2). This population is likely LRB-DOPE in the lower
leaflet of the bilayer, next to the glass support. Its slow diffusion
likely does not reflect the diffusion rate of DOPC and DOPS in the
lower leaflet, but rather stems from its bulky and ionic fluorescent
headgroup bridging with or near the glass surface. This slow-diffusing
population was not observed in our previous studies, likely due to
an experimental protocol that included prebleaching of slow and immobile
populations prior to data acquisition.[24,29]As a
test for diffusion of the lower leaflet, we performed simple FRAP
measurements using tail-labeled NBD-PC as the fluorophore (Figure S3). These revealed complete recovery
with a diffusion constant of approximately 0.6 ± 0.2 μm2/s, 4–5-fold slower than LRB-DOPE in the upper leaflet
but >100-fold faster than the slow population of LRB-DOPE. Thus,
the
slow population of LRB-DOPE is not representative of bulk lipids in
the lower leaflet.
Diffusion of Syt7 C2A, C2B, and C2AB Domains
Following
imaging of lipid diffusion, fluorescent-tagged protein (10–100
pM) was added to the bilayer. Because Syt7 C2 domains bind with high
affinity and slow off-rate to the 3:1 PC/PS bilayer,[2,32,40] each protein appeared as a field
of mobile fluorescent spots with very little background contamination
(Figure 3 and Movies S3–S8). Imaging parameters were chosen to minimize background fluorescence
and bleed-through of LRB-DOPE into the 488 channel (Figure 3, bottom right panel). Rarely, samples with a large
population of immobile particles or poor binding of fluorescent protein
to the bilayer were observed. These defects indicate incomplete bilayer
formation; therefore, such samples were discarded without analysis.
Protein–membrane binding was Ca2+-dependent, as
addition of 2 mM EDTA removed nearly all fluorescent particles from
the surface (Figure S2).
Figure 3
Images of protein diffusion.
All images are taken from movies acquired
with 50 ms exposure and illustrate random, uniform distributions of
particles with negligible background contamination. The bottom right
panel shows the same bilayer as that in the bottom left panel but
prior to the addition of protein. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative
movies are available in the Supporting Information.
Images of protein diffusion.
All images are taken from movies acquired
with 50 ms exposure and illustrate random, uniform distributions of
particles with negligible background contamination. The bottom right
panel shows the same bilayer as that in the bottom left panel but
prior to the addition of protein. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative
movies are available in the Supporting Information.In order to quantify accurately
and consistently the diffusion
constant of each protein species, at least eight separate replicates
acquired on two or more days of experiments were analyzed for each
protein species. Four or five movies of AF488–protein diffusion
were acquired from each sample. Most movies produced 500 to 2000 particle
trajectories comprising a total of 105 or more steps, which
were pooled and analyzed. For C2A and C2B, diffusion was well-described
by fitting the squared displacement data to a single diffusing population,
whereas the C2AB tandem domains were better fit to a combination of
two populations (Figure 4). The faster-diffusing
population was lower in abundance, consisting of 3–20% of the
total steps (Table 1). Its abundance varied
between C2AB species, with the wild-type tandem typically containing
the largest fast-diffusing population, although the abundance also
varied between days of experiments. The population of the faster-diffusing
state was too low to accurately measure its diffusion constant; attempted
fitting of data led to wide variability in best-fit parameters when
the faster diffusion constant was allowed to float. However, consistent
quality fits were obtained when the diffusion constant of this state
was fixed at 1.8 μm2/s, on the assumption that the
population corresponds to molecules with only one C2 domain bound
to the membrane (see Experimental Methods).
Figure 4
Representative fits of squared-displacement data to cumulative
density functions. Fits are shown to a single-component model (eq 3, dashed lines) and a two-component model in which
the faster-diffusing component was constrained to that of a single
C2 domain (eq 4, solid lines). For each movie,
such fitting was performed for Δt values from
3 (0.15 s) to 8 frames (0.4 s). Individual fits were improved slightly
at the longest step sizes for C2AB-WT and C2AB-FE4 when the diffusion
constant of the faster-diffusing component was unconstrained; however,
the value of diffusion constants obtained in this manner was inconsistent
among different Δt values from the same movie,
which resulted in large uncertainties in the other fit parameters
due to covariation. Thus, to improve consistency, the value of 1.8
μm2/s was chosen as D for the fast-diffusing
species.
Representative fits of squared-displacement data to cumulative
density functions. Fits are shown to a single-component model (eq 3, dashed lines) and a two-component model in which
the faster-diffusing component was constrained to that of a single
C2 domain (eq 4, solid lines). For each movie,
such fitting was performed for Δt values from
3 (0.15 s) to 8 frames (0.4 s). Individual fits were improved slightly
at the longest step sizes for C2AB-WT and C2AB-FE4 when the diffusion
constant of the faster-diffusing component was unconstrained; however,
the value of diffusion constants obtained in this manner was inconsistent
among different Δt values from the same movie,
which resulted in large uncertainties in the other fit parameters
due to covariation. Thus, to improve consistency, the value of 1.8
μm2/s was chosen as D for the fast-diffusing
species.Analysis of mean-squared displacement
of the major population as
a function of lag time showed linear relationships, indicating free
diffusion without barriers for all species (Figure 5). From the slope of these fits, diffusion constants were
calculated for each movie. ANOVA analysis indicated that the sample-to-sample
variability exceeded the movie-to-movie variability within each sample,
suggesting that small differences in mobility exist between different
supported bilayers.[29,41] Therefore, the diffusion constant
of each sample was calculated as the average D value
from all 4 to 5 movies acquired on the same supported bilayer. The D values for each protein species were then averaged from
among the sample diffusion coefficients and are reported in Table 1. In a control experiment, versions of Syt7 C2A
labeled with three different fluorophores with different sized aromatic
ring structures (AF488, AF555, and AF647) showed identical diffusion
constants, within measurement error, when imaged on the same bilayer
(Table S1). This indicates that the fluorophore
has negligible impact on the diffusion constant. AF488 was chosen
for the continued work because of its photostability relative to Alexa
Fluor 647 and because the 552 nm channel was used for the control
measurements of LRB-DOPE.
Figure 5
MSD plots from representative movies of Syt7
C2A (open circles),
C2B (filled circles), and C2AB-WT (open squares). Plots of other C2AB
species overlay closely with C2AB-WT and are omitted for clarity.
Solid lines show linear fits to eq 5, indicating
diffusion without barriers on this time scale. Error bars were calculated
as described.[54] Where not visible, error
bars on individual points are smaller than the symbols.
MSD plots from representative movies of Syt7
C2A (open circles),
C2B (filled circles), and C2AB-WT (open squares). Plots of other C2AB
species overlay closely with C2AB-WT and are omitted for clarity.
Solid lines show linear fits to eq 5, indicating
diffusion without barriers on this time scale. Error bars were calculated
as described.[54] Where not visible, error
bars on individual points are smaller than the symbols.The Syt7 C2A and C2B domains have identical (within
error) diffusion
constants of 1.8 μm2/s, comparable to those of other
C2 domains, whereas the C2AB tandems exhibited significantly slower
diffusion of 1.0 μm2/s (Figure 5 and Table 1). This is the expected result
for a scenario in which both C2 domains experience significant membrane
contact.[25,27,28] Indeed, the
measured diffusion constant of the wild-type C2AB tandem is 54% of
the individual domains’ diffusion constants and is within error
of the diffusion constant predicted using eq 2 (Dpred, Table 1). Increasing the length of the C2A–C2B linker had no effect
on diffusion, within experimental error (Table 1). Together, these results are consistent with the two C2 domains
docked independently and simultaneously to the supported lipid bilayer.As a qualitative probe of the lifetime of the fast-diffusing state,
the diffusion constant of each trajectory was estimated, and the probability
distribution was fitted to the sum of two Lorentzian distributions.
This fitting approach describes a mixture of two long-lived states
whose average lifetime is significantly longer than the average trajectory
length.[28] Indeed, the data fit well to
the sum of two distributions with maxima near 1.0 and 1.8 μm2/s (Figure 6). This clear separation
indicates that the observed heterogeneity in diffusion states does
not arise from reversible transitions within individual trajectories.
Rather, the fast-diffusing state is long-lived and most likely arises
from a subpopulation of molecules with only one functional C2 domain.
Figure 6
Bimodal
distribution of diffusion constants among trajectories.
Diffusion constants were estimated from the mean-square displacement
of each trajectory using a Δt value of one
frame. Distributions were fit to either a single Lorentzian (eq 6, dashed line) or the sum of two Lorentzian distributions
(eq 7, solid line), omitting the small immobile
population. Distributions of diffusion constants have been empirically
found to fit well to Lorentzian functions.[28] The distribution shown encompasses 806 trajectories from one movie
of C2AB-WT and is representative of distributions analyzed similarly
from three movies of this species.
Bimodal
distribution of diffusion constants among trajectories.
Diffusion constants were estimated from the mean-square displacement
of each trajectory using a Δt value of one
frame. Distributions were fit to either a single Lorentzian (eq 6, dashed line) or the sum of two Lorentzian distributions
(eq 7, solid line), omitting the small immobile
population. Distributions of diffusion constants have been empirically
found to fit well to Lorentzian functions.[28] The distribution shown encompasses 806 trajectories from one movie
of C2AB-WT and is representative of distributions analyzed similarly
from three movies of this species.In an attempt to directly test for interactions between C2A
and
C2B, diffusion of the isolated fluorescent-tagged C2B domain was measured
in the presence of approximately equimolar unlabeled Syt7 C2A (∼100
pM total concentrations of each protein in the sample chamber). The
unlabeled C2A domain did not slow diffusion of the C2B domain (Table S2), as would have been expected upon heterodimer
formation.[28] Thus, C2A–C2B heterodimers
are not observed at these concentrations.
EDTA-Induced Dissociation
of Single and Tandem Domains
Additive friction could be consistent
either with independent membrane
associations of the two domains or with a combination of both interdomain
interaction (which would speed diffusion) and insertion a few angstroms
deeper into the upper membrane leaflet (which would slow diffusion).[25] Therefore, as an alternative approach to test
for interdomain cooperativity, we measured membrane dissociation kinetics
of Syt7 C2A, C2B, and C2AB domains induced by the rapid addition of
the Ca2+ chelator EDTA. Addition of EDTA to preformed C2
domain–membrane complexes induces dissociation and prevents
rebinding as each C2 domain loses its bound Ca2+ ions irreversibly.[42]Syt7 C2A and C2B dissociation profiles
from 3:1 PC/PS membranes were single-exponential, as observed on the
basis of FRET between intrinsic Trp residues and dansyl-PE included
in the liposomes (Figure 7A). C2AB dissociation
proceeded on approximately the same overall time scale as that of
the individual domains, but it did so with a kinetic profile that
was not well fit by a single-exponential decay. Rather, these data
included a lag phase and were better modeled as a two-step process,
in which only the second step produces a FRET change. This profile
is reasonable, as whichever domain dissociates first would remain
in close enough proximity to the membrane for Trp-to-dansyl FRET to
occur (R0 ≈ 21–24 Å)
until the other domain dissociates.[43] Alternatively,
each domain may first transition to a weakly membrane-associated state,
from which dissociation proceeds rapidly in the absence of Ca2+ (Figure 8; see Discussion).
Figure 7
EDTA-induced membrane dissociation of individual and tandem Syt7
C2 domains. (A) Syt7 C2A and C2B dissociation profiles from 3:1 PC/PS
membranes. (B) Dissociation kinetics for the FE16 linker extension
variant of Syt7 C2AB. (C) Dissociation kinetics for a variant of the
C2AB tandem (PP12) with a rigid polyproline sequence inserted into
the C2A–C2B linker region that prohibits interdomain interactions.
Dashed lines indicate single-exponential fits, and solid lines mark
fits of C2AB dissociation to a two-step model (eq 9), as described in the text. Insets show expansions of the
lag phase (gray boxed regions), illustrating improved fitting from
the two-step model. Data points are averages of 12 mixing events using
the same solutions. The indicated rate constants are from measurements
performed in parallel and are representative of 2 or more replicate
experiments performed on different days with different preparations
of vesicles. Rate constants varied by ∼40% between liposome
preparations, but the reported trends between the proteins were consistent.
Figure 8
Model of Syt7 C2 membrane-bound states and dissociation.
Membrane-bound
states and dissociation mechanisms in the presence of excess Ca2+ are predicted on the basis of TIRFM measurements, whereas
proposed mechanisms of EDTA-induced dissociation are based on koff measurements (Figure 7). (Top) C2A occupies a tightly bound, deeply inserted (left) and
a weaker bound state in which Ca2+ ions are accessible
to removal by EDTA (center). Thus, addition of EDTA results in a millisecond
time scale depenetration followed by a rapid dissociation (right).
(Middle) The isolated C2B domain may behave similarly to C2A but with
faster depenetration kinetics. (Bottom) In the presence of Ca2+ (i.e., our TIRFM experiments), C2AB tandems are predominantly
in a doubly inserted state (left) in which frictional coefficients
of the two domains are additive. Upon addition of EDTA, depenetration
and dissociation of C2A and C2B, in either sequential order, are observed
with rate constants similar to those of the individual domains.
EDTA-induced membrane dissociation of individual and tandem Syt7
C2 domains. (A) Syt7 C2A and C2B dissociation profiles from 3:1 PC/PS
membranes. (B) Dissociation kinetics for the FE16 linker extension
variant of Syt7 C2AB. (C) Dissociation kinetics for a variant of the
C2AB tandem (PP12) with a rigidpolyproline sequence inserted into
the C2A–C2B linker region that prohibits interdomain interactions.
Dashed lines indicate single-exponential fits, and solid lines mark
fits of C2AB dissociation to a two-step model (eq 9), as described in the text. Insets show expansions of the
lag phase (gray boxed regions), illustrating improved fitting from
the two-step model. Data points are averages of 12 mixing events using
the same solutions. The indicated rate constants are from measurements
performed in parallel and are representative of 2 or more replicate
experiments performed on different days with different preparations
of vesicles. Rate constants varied by ∼40% between liposome
preparations, but the reported trends between the proteins were consistent.Model of Syt7 C2 membrane-bound states and dissociation.
Membrane-bound
states and dissociation mechanisms in the presence of excess Ca2+ are predicted on the basis of TIRFM measurements, whereas
proposed mechanisms of EDTA-induced dissociation are based on koff measurements (Figure 7). (Top) C2A occupies a tightly bound, deeply inserted (left) and
a weaker bound state in which Ca2+ ions are accessible
to removal by EDTA (center). Thus, addition of EDTA results in a millisecond
time scale depenetration followed by a rapid dissociation (right).
(Middle) The isolated C2B domain may behave similarly to C2A but with
faster depenetration kinetics. (Bottom) In the presence of Ca2+ (i.e., our TIRFM experiments), C2AB tandems are predominantly
in a doubly inserted state (left) in which frictional coefficients
of the two domains are additive. Upon addition of EDTA, depenetration
and dissociation of C2A and C2B, in either sequential order, are observed
with rate constants similar to those of the individual domains.The best-fit rate constants of
the two C2AB dissociation steps
correspond well to those of the two individual domains. Importantly,
the two-step model used for fitting does not specify the sequential
order of the two events; eq 9 is identical if k2 and k1 are reversed.
Either domain may dissociate first, or the sequence may be stochastic
based on the individual domains’ dissociation kinetics. Thus,
the data are fully consistent with a model in which C2A and C2B dissociate
from the membrane independently (Figure 8).In further support of independent dissociation, we observe that
dissociation kinetics for the FE16 linker extension variant of Syt7
C2AB are virtually identical to the WT tandem domain (Figure 7B). Dissociation kinetics are also nearly identical
for a variant of the C2AB tandem (PP12) with a rigidpolyproline sequence
inserted into the C2A–C2B linker region that prohibits interdomain
interactions (Figure 7C).[13] We note that the polyproline variant copurified with a
lower-MW contaminant, likely a cleavage product (Figure S4). However, the dissociation kinetics clearly reveal
a lag phase and overall kinetic profile closely similar to that of
C2AB-WT. Thus, we conclude that binding of Syt7 C2AB to these target
membranes does not include significant interdomain interactions but
consists of independent membrane associations by the two domains.
Discussion
Analysis of Tandem Domain Diffusional States
Here,
single-molecule diffusion measurements show that (a) the C2A and C2B
domains of Syt7 diffuse similarly to that of other C2 domains on a
3:1 PC/PS supported lipid bilayer, (b) diffusion of the native C2AB
tandem approaches the value predicted based on additive friction of
the two individual domains, and (c) flexible extensions to the C2AB
interdomain linker do not measurably impact diffusion constants. It
is worth noting that different conclusions would have been reached
if we had analyzed tandem domain diffusion using only one-component
models (dashed lines in Figure 4), as these
models produced significantly faster diffusion constants for C2AB-WT
and C2AB-FE4 (1.12 ± 0.08 and 1.14 ± 0.11 μm2/s, respectively). Careful examination of the diffusion data revealed
the population of fast-diffusing particles in these movies. Thus,
the results underscore the importance of informed analysis of multiple
states when analyzing single-molecule diffusion data.Due to
its relatively small population, the fast-diffusing state in the C2AB
samples was most reproducibly modeled by fixing its diffusion constant
at the value of a single domain and fitting to obtain the population
in that state. The nature of this fast-diffusing state is unknown;
however, SDS-PAGE results show that the fluorescent proteins were
free of cleavage products (Figure 2). Protein
absorbance spectra also demonstrate essentially complete removal of
nucleic acid contaminants, which could compete with membranes for
binding each C2 domain (Figure S1). Nevertheless,
it is possible that small remaining contaminants could produce a population
of molecules with only one membrane-active C2 domain. A reversible
conformational equilibrium seems unlikely, as a breakdown of diffusion
constant by trajectory (Figure 6) shows that
the fast-diffusing population is stable on the time scale of entire
trajectories.
Additive Friction
Previous studies
have demonstrated
additive friction for multidomain lipid-binding proteins using either
(a) synthetic covalent multimers of a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain
separated by 27-residue or longer flexible linkers,[27] (b) noncovalent dimers induced by fusing the same PH domain
to soluble interacting proteins,[28] or (c)
physiological combinations of C1 and C2 domains from protein kinase
Cα (PKCα).[25,44] PKCα contains a 15-residue
flexible linker between its two C1 domains and a 20-residue linker
between the C1b domain and the C2 domain.[25] Thus, the present study of Syt C2AB tandems represents the shortest
linker length examined for additive friction to date.Camley
and Brown have predicted that diffusion constants such as those measured
here for multidomain proteins on supported lipid bilayers approach
apparent frictional additivity when their bound lipids are separated
by a few nanometers or more but diffuse significantly faster at shorter
separation distances.[29] It has not yet
been possible to experimentally validate this prediction, as all tandem
domains measured thus far have exhibited additive friction. Comparing
single-domain to C2AB-WT diffusion yields a Ddimer/Dmonomer ratio of 0.54, with
an uncertainty of ±0.05 obtained by propagating error from the
95% CI values of the individual measurements (Table 1). By contrast, Camley and Brown predict that protein domains
∼2 nm apart, each bound to a single lipid with a footprint
radius of 0.45 nm, would have Ddimer/Dmonomer > 0.60.[29] Deeply inserted C2 domains have a footprint radius of ∼1
nm, so a 2 nm center-to-center separation represents the distance
of closest approach, at which the Ddimer/Dmonomer ratio is expected to be even
higher.[28,45] The relatively extended linker configuration
illustrated in Figure 1A corresponds to a center-to-center
separation distance of ∼4 nm. The observed near-additive friction
suggests that the two domains remain well separated when bound to
a PC/PS supported bilayer.
Dissociation Kinetics in Stopped-Flow and
TIRFM Experiments
The time scale of dissociation induced
by EDTA addition (Figure 7) is much shorter
than the average dwell times of
individual molecules on the membrane observed in the TIRFM experiments
in the presence of Ca2+. Dissociation rate constants were
not measured in TIRFM experiments due to photobleaching, but most
trajectories of all domains had membrane-bound lifetimes of several
hundred milliseconds or longer. Different off rates in the presence
and absence of Ca2+ have been observed for other C2 domains
as well and may arise from cooperative binding of Ca2+ ions
and membranes.[25,42,46,47] A simple model that accounts for this behavior
is presented in Figure 8. Here, each individual
domain exists in both a tightly membrane-bound (likely embedded) state
and a loosely associated (likely surface-bound) state, the latter
of which may or may not be bound to Ca2+ ions. In the presence
of excess Ca2+, the two states are in equilibrium, with
the tightly bound state predominating; thus, the TIRFM data show long-lived
membrane-bound particles. In the presence of EDTA, loss of bound Ca2+ and membrane dissociation proceeds rapidly from the loosely
associated state; thus, the transition from the tightly to loosely
bound state is rate-limiting for EDTA-induced dissociation.
Implications
for Structure of Membrane-Bound Syt7 C2AB and Relation
to Syt1
Overall, our data are most consistent with independent
membrane binding by the two C2 domains of Syt7. Previous studies have
reported an absence of interdomain interactions for Syt1 C2AB in solution
via NMR and single-molecule FRET.[20,48] An alternative
explanation of our diffusion results is that the two domains directly
interact when bound to a supported bilayer but simultaneously insert
more deeply into the bilayer than individual domains.[17] However, such a direct interaction with deeper insertion
would be expected to stabilize the membrane-bound state and significantly
slow membrane dissociation, which we do not observe. Interdomain cooperativity
in membrane insertion by Syt1 C2AB has been reported, although specific
interdomain protein contacts have not been identified.[14,22] However, it has also been observed that Syt1 C2AB can induce curvature,
cluster lipids, and bridge between membranes, suggesting the forces
that drive cooperativity may be more complex than interdomain interactions
in a planar membrane.[17,48−50] The supported
bilayer system used in the TIRFM experiments precludes curvature and
bridging, and the small sonicated vesicles used for stopped-flow likely
prevent the induction of negative curvature, as has been implicated
for Syt1.[49,51,52] Further studies
are needed to determine whether membrane curvature influences cooperativity
in membrane binding.Finally, analogous measurements could not
be performed with Syt1, as Syt1 C2A dissociates too rapidly to measure
lateral diffusion or dissociation kinetics accurately under the conditions
used here. Thus, it is possible that the properties measured are unique
to Syt7. Syt7 C2 domains dissociate from membranes much more slowly
than the corresponding segments of other Syt isoforms, suggesting
that they may have a larger membrane-binding interface.[32,40] Furthermore, a hybrid form of Syt1 containing the C2B domain from
Syt7 cannot rescue fast fusion in neurons from Syt1 knockout mice,
suggesting that these two C2B domains function differently.[11] Also, it was recently shown that chromaffin
cell vesicles display dramatically different postfusion behavior depending
on whether they contain Syt1 or Syt7, although it is not known whether
the disparity stems from Syt–membrane or protein–protein
interactions.[53] Additional measurements,
under conditions that favor longer-lived membrane association, may
reveal whether additive friction and independent membrane association
are unique to Syt7 or are common to other synaptotagmins.
Authors: Tejeshwar C Rao; Daniel R Passmore; Andrew R Peleman; Madhurima Das; Edwin R Chapman; Arun Anantharam Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Pradeep Sathyanarayana; Satyaghosh Maurya; Amit Behera; Monisha Ravichandran; Sandhya S Visweswariah; K Ganapathy Ayappa; Rahul Roy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel D MacDougall; Zesen Lin; Nara L Chon; Skyler L Jackman; Hai Lin; Jefferson D Knight; Arun Anantharam Journal: J Gen Physiol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 4.086