Literature DB >> 25437483

Evaluation of corneal changes after conventional versus accelerated corneal cross-linking: a randomized controlled trial.

Hesam Hashemian, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, Mehdi Khodaparast, Kambiz Ameli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking (CXL) procedures regarding their effect on morphological and optical properties of the cornea.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-three eyes of 153 patients were evaluated before and during a 15-month follow-up period after CXL (76 eyes in the conventional group and 77 eyes in the accelerated group). Measured variables include corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refraction, maximum keratometry, endothelial cell density, anterior and posterior stromal keratocyte density, and subbasal nerve density. All variables were compared between the two study groups.
RESULTS: Cylindrical and spherical components of refraction improved significantly during 15 months of follow-up. No difference was observed between the two study groups. UDVA and CDVA improved in the same manner, with no intergroup differences. Endothelial cell density did not change significantly during the follow-up period in either group. K-max increased slightly in the first month of the follow-up, but started to decrease at postoperative visits without any significant difference in the two groups. Anterior stromal keratocyte density and subbasal nerve density decreased significantly in both groups 1 month postoperatively. Both variables had a more significant decrease in the conventional group at all visits before the 1-year visit. At the final 15-month visit, there were no significant differences in any value between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated and conventional CXL seem to have a comparable and acceptable effect on keratoconus in the short-term follow-up period. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25437483     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20141117-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  24 in total

1.  Tear function and ocular surface changes following corneal collagen cross-linking treatment in keratoconus patients: 18-month results.

Authors:  Betul Seher Uysal; Emine Akcay; Aydan Kilicarslan; Melek Mutlu; Gozde Hondur; Pinar Kosekahya; Nurullah Cagil
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Early epithelial complications of accelerated trans-epithelial corneal crosslinking in treatment of keratoconus: a case series.

Authors:  Sharon S W Chow; Tommy C Y Chan; Ian Y H Wong; Michelle C Y Fan; Jimmy S M Lai; Alex L K Ng
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Accelerated versus standard corneal cross linking in the treatment of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty: a medium term randomized trial.

Authors:  Hany A Khairy; Moataz F Elsawy; Khaled Said-Ahmed; Marwa A Zaki; Sameh S Mandour
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  [Riboflavin UVA crosslinking in progressive keratoconus].

Authors:  P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: an intrapatient comparative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Bahram Einollahi; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Danial Roshandel; Hamidreza Hasani; Mehrdad Nazeri
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 7.  Adverse events after riboflavin/UV-A corneal cross-linking: a literature review.

Authors:  Sebastiano Serrao; Giuseppe Lombardo; Marco Lombardo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Accelerated, Pulsed Collagen Cross-Linking versus the Dresden Protocol in Keratoconus: A Case Series.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dervenis; Panagiotis Dervenis; Nikolaos Dragoumis; Andreas Papandroudis; Zachos Zachariadis; Miltos Balidis
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 1.927

9.  One-year outcomes of conventional and accelerated collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Vanissa W S Chow; Tommy C Y Chan; Marco Yu; Victoria W Y Wong; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Collagen cross-linking: when and how? A review of the state of the art of the technique and new perspectives.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.