Literature DB >> 25436964

Black wildebeest seek shade less and use solar orientation behavior more than do blue wildebeest.

Hilary M Lease1, Ian W Murray2, Andrea Fuller2, Robyn S Hetem2.   

Abstract

Many ungulates, including wildebeest, seek shade and orient their bodies relative to incoming solar radiation in order to reduce environmental heat loads. Blue (Connochaetes taurinus) and black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), which co-exist artificially in some reserves in South Africa, are thought to adopt different thermoregulatory behaviors to mitigate high environmental heat loads. However, whether or not blue and black wildebeest use different behaviors to reduce heat loads in regions where they co-occur has never previously been examined. We compared the shade seeking and solar orientation behavior of free-ranging blue and black wildebeest in summer at three locations in South Africa where both species co-occur. We found that blue wildebeest exhibited more shade seeking behavior than did black wildebeest at all times of day, at all study sites. Black wildebeest remained in the sun but were more likely than blue wildebeest to orient their bodies parallel to the sun at all study sites, a behavior which reduces the amount of surface area exposed to incoming radiation. Black wildebeest were most likely to employ parallel solar orientation during the hottest times of the day when the sun was not directly overhead (i.e., solar noon ± 1 hour). We thus demonstrate that co-occurring blue and black wildebeest use different thermoregulatory behaviors to reduce high heat loads. It is possible that the lack of shade in the historical distribution of black wildebeest led to selective pressure for reliance on solar orientation. Differences in thermoregulatory behavior can affect species-specific heat loads, habitat use, body mass, fitness and grazing activity. Such differences may also allow blue and black wildebeest to inhabit separate microclimates within the same habitat, provided there is sufficient heterogeneity in vegetation structure, potentially facilitating reproductive isolation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orientation; Temperature; Thermoregulation; Ungulate

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25436964     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Therm Biol        ISSN: 0306-4565            Impact factor:   2.902


  3 in total

1.  Behaviour influences thermoregulation of boreal moose during the warm season.

Authors:  Daniel P Thompson; John A Crouse; Perry S Barboza; Miles O Spathelf; Andrew M Herberg; Stephanie D Parker; Max A Morris
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Living on the edge: Daily, seasonal and annual body temperature patterns of Arabian oryx in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  S Streicher; H Lutermann; N C Bennett; M F Bertelsen; O B Mohammed; P R Manger; M Scantlebury; K Ismael; A N Alagaili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  An experimental approach in revisiting the magnetic orientation of cattle.

Authors:  Debby Weijers; Lia Hemerik; Ignas M A Heitkönig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.