| Literature DB >> 25436226 |
T P Adarsh Krishna1, T P Ajeesh Krishna1, N D Chithra2, P E Deepa2, U Darsana1, K P Sreelekha1, Sanis Juliet1, Suresh N Nair1, Reghu Ravindran2, K G Ajith Kumar2, Srikanta Ghosh3.
Abstract
The acaricidal activity of the petroleum ether extract of leaves of Tetrastigma leucostaphylum (Dennst.) Alston (family: Vitaceae) against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus was assessed using adult immersion test (AIT). The per cent of adult mortality, inhibition of fecundity, and blocking of hatching of eggs were studied at different concentrations. The extract at 10% concentration showed 88.96% inhibition of fecundity, 58.32% of adult tick mortality, and 50% inhibition of hatching. Peak mortality rate was observed after day 5 of treatment. Mortality of engorged female ticks, inhibition of fecundity, and hatching of eggs were concentration dependent. The LC50 value of the extract against R. (B.) annulatus was 10.46%. The HPTLC profiling of the petroleum ether extract revealed the presence of at least seven polyvalent components. In the petroleum ether extract, nicotine was identified as one of the components up to a concentration of 5.4%. However, nicotine did not reveal any acaricidal activity up to 20000 ppm (2%). Coconut oil, used as diluent for dissolving the extract, did not reveal any acaricidal effects. The results are indicative of the involvement of synergistic or additive action of the bioactive components in the tick mortality and inhibition of the oviposition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25436226 PMCID: PMC4243479 DOI: 10.1155/2014/715481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Tetrastigma leucostaphylum (Dennst.) Alston. (in wild) leaves are simple, defoliate, and trifoliate; all three types were found on the same plant; leaf 0–17 × 0–12; leaflets 4–13 × 2–6 cm; oblong-lanceolate; base cuneate; margin coarsely serrate, especially distally; apex acute; coriaceous; the laterals unequal sided; petiole to 8 cm long; warty-lenticellate; base swollen; petioules 5–14 mm long.
Figure 2Chromatogram showing the HPTLC profiling of petroleum ether leaf extract of T. leucostaphylum (AU—Absorbance units; Rf—Retardation factor; NICO—Nicotine).
Figure 3General HPTLC finger print profile of nicotine standard (NICO) with petroleum ether leaf extract of T. leucostaphylum (PEELTL) at wavelength 254 nm, 366 nm and visible light.
Effect of petroleum ether extract of leaves of T. leucostaphylum (PEELTL) against R. (B.) annulatus.
| Sl. number | Acaricide | Mean tick weight per replicate ± SEM (g) | Mean % adult mortality within 15 days ± SEM | Mean eggs mass per replicate ± SEM (g) | Index of fecundity ± SEM | Inhibition of fecundity (%) | Hatching (Visual %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unrefined coconut oil | 1.347 ± 0.017ab | 0 ± 0a | 0.575 ± 0.042b | 0.427 ± 0.033a | 0 | 100 |
| 2 | PEELTL-(1.25%) | 1.322 ± 0.024a | 16.660 ± 6.80a | 0.493 ± 0.034b | 0.372 ± 0.024a | 12.73 | 100 |
| 3 | PEELTL-(2.5%) | 1.342 ± 0.027ab | 16.660 ± 9.62a | 0.454 ± 0.044b | 0.337 ± 0.029a | 21.73 | 100 |
| 4 | PEELTL-(5%) | 1.341 ± 0.001ab | 24.990 ± 8.33a | 0.428 ± 0.043b | 0.319 ± 0.033a | 25.57 | 100 |
| 5 | PEELTL-(10%) | 1.320 ± 0.055a | 58.320 ± 14.43b | 0.059 ± 0.052a | 0.047 ± 0.041a | 88.97 | 50 |
n = 4; values are mean ± SEM; means bearing different superscripts a or b (P < 0.05) indicate significant difference when compared with the control and petroleum ether extract of leaves of T. leucostaphylum.
Figure 4Dose mortality curve of R. (B.) annulatus against petroleum ether extract of leaves of T. leucostaphylum.
Effect of nicotine against R. (B.) annulatus.
| Sl. number | Acaricide | Mean tick weight per replicate ± SEM (g) | Mean % adult mortality within 15 days ± SEM | Mean eggs mass per replicate ± SEM (g) | Index of fecundity ± SEM | Inhibition of fecundity (%) | Hatching (Visual %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Methanol (Control) | 0.834 ± 0.009a | 0 ± 0 | 0.390 ± 0.002b | 0.462 ± 0.006a | 0 | 100 |
| 2 | 1250 ppm | 0.867 ± 0.011a | 0 ± 0 | 0.332 ± 0.005a | 0.383 ± 0.004b | 16.96 | 100 |
| 3 | 2500 ppm | 0.826 ± 0.021a | 0 ± 0 | 0.311 ± 0.015a | 0.377 ± 0.013b | 18.43 | 100 |
| 4 | 5000 ppm | 0.839 ± 0.016a | 0 ± 0 | 0.310 ± 0.027a | 0.369 ± 0.029b | 20.01 | 100 |
| 5 | 10000 ppm | 0.845 ± 0.016a | 0 ± 0 | 0.306 ± 0.018a | 0.364 ± 0.024b | 21.22 | 100 |
| 6 | 20000 ppm | 0.834 ± 0.006a | 0 ± 0 | 0.299 ± 0.002a | 0.358 ± 0.003b | 22.41 | 100 |
n = 4; values are mean ± SEM; means bearing different superscripts a or b (P < 0.05) indicate significant difference when compared with the control and nicotine standard.