| Literature DB >> 25436080 |
Amjad Hashemi1, Valiallah Saba2, Seyed Navid Resalat3.
Abstract
The objective of this study is development of driver's sleepiness using Visually Evoked Potentials (VEP). VEP computed from EEG signals from the visual cortex. We use the Steady State VEPs (SSVEPs) that are one of the most important EEG signals used in human computer interface systems. SSVEP is a response to visual stimuli presented. We present a classification method to discriminate between closed eyes and opened eyes. Fourier transforms and power spectrum density features extracted from signals and Multilayer perceptron and radial basis function neural networks used for classification. The experimental results show an accuracy of 97% for test data.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25436080 PMCID: PMC4202601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Clin Neurosci ISSN: 2008-126X
Figure 1The position of the LEDs and electrodes in the second experimental setup. The left and the right images are the projection of the setup in sagittal and transverse planes, respectively.
Figure 2Averaged spectrums of EEG signals of all subjects; top left and top right figure correspond to 4 LEDs in close and open eyes states, respectively; bottom left and bottom right corresponds to 4 pairs LEDs in close and open eyes states, respectively.
Accuracy of the MLP classifier with FFT and PSD features over the sweep lengths. (A) And (B) correspond to external light sources of 15 HZ and 20 HZ for test data.
| (A) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (%) | FFT Features | PSD Features | ||||
| 0.5s sweep | 1s sweep | 2s sweep | 0.5s sweep | 1s sweep | 2s sweep | |
| Sub #1 | 88.5 | 89.2 | 93 | 88.5 | 95.4 | 97.1 |
| Sub #2 | 89.7 | 94.2 | 95 | 88.9 | 95.4 | 96.4 |
| Sub #3 | 87.3 | 95 | 98.2 | 90.4 | 96 | 97 |
| Sub #4 | 90 | 93.3 | 97.3 | 90.2 | 93.4 | 96.9 |
| Sub #5 | 90.3 | 95 | 98 | 90.6 | 95 | 97.7 |
| Averaged Acc | 89.1 | 93.34 | 96.3 | 89.72 | 95.04 | 97.02 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sub #1 | 87.5 | 88.6 | 91.4 | 88.1 | 89.5 | 96 |
| Sub #2 | 89.4 | 91.2 | 93.3 | 87.9 | 94.2 | 93.2 |
| Sub #3 | 87.1 | 92.2 | 95.7 | 88.4 | 94 | 95 |
| Sub #4 | 89.5 | 91.3 | 94.6 | 88.2 | 90.9 | 97.1 |
| Sub #5 | 88.6 | 92 | 96 | 90.4 | 93 | 96.7 |
| Averaged Acc | 88.42 | 91.06 | 94.2 | 88.6 | 92.32 | 95.6 |
Accuracy of the RBF classifier with FFT and PSD features over the sweep lengths. (A) And (B) correspond to external light sources of 15 HZ and 20 HZ for test data.
| (A) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (%) | FFT Features | PSD Features | ||||
| 0.5s sweep | 1s sweep | 2s sweep | 0.5s sweep | 1s sweep | 2s sweep | |
| Sub #1 | 88.5 | 88.6 | 92.1 | 87.1 | 92.8 | 95.6 |
| Sub #2 | 83.9 | 91.7 | 93 | 86.6 | 91.6 | 94.7 |
| Sub #3 | 85.3 | 90.5 | 92.5 | 86.9 | 91 | 93.4 |
| Sub #4 | 84.9 | 92.1 | 94.3 | 85.7 | 90.9 | 95 |
| Sub #5 | 84.7 | 90 | 93.8 | 85.9 | 91.4 | 93.7 |
| Averaged Acc | 85.46 | 90.58 | 93.14 | 86.44 | 91.54 | 94.48 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sub #1 | 87.4 | 88.6 | 91.6 | 85.3 | 92.4 | 93.7 |
| Sub #2 | 82.5 | 90.3 | 91.1 | 83.9 | 91 | 92.4 |
| Sub #3 | 85.3 | 90.9 | 92 | 85 | 91.3 | 93.6 |
| Sub #4 | 84.9 | 89.3 | 92.5 | 85.7 | 89.7 | 92.6 |
| Sub #5 | 83.5 | 88.5 | 91.9 | 85.9 | 91.2 | 93 |
| Averaged Acc | 84.72 | 89.52 | 91.82 | 85.16 | 91.12 | 93.06 |