Abraham Wolcott1, Theanne Schiros2, Matthew E Trusheim3, Edward H Chen3, Dennis Nordlund4, Rosa E Diaz5, Ophir Gaathon6, Dirk Englund3, Jonathan S Owen2. 1. Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States ; Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States ; Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States ; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States ; Diamond Nanotechnologies Inc., Boston, Massachusetts 02134, United States. 2. Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States. 3. Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States ; Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States ; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 4. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory , Menlo Park, California 94025, United States. 5. Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory , Upton, New York 11973, United States. 6. Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States ; Department of Chemistry, Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Energy Frontier Research Center, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States ; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States ; Diamond Nanotechnologies Inc., Boston, Massachusetts 02134, United States.
Abstract
We investigate the aerobic oxidation of high-pressure, high-temperature nanodiamonds (5-50 nm dimensions) using a combination of carbon and oxygen K-edge X-ray absorption, wavelength-dependent X-ray photoelectron, and vibrational spectroscopies. Oxidation at 575 °C for 2 h eliminates graphitic carbon contamination (>98%) and produces nanocrystals with hydroxyl functionalized surfaces as well as a minor component (<5%) of carboxylic anhydrides. The low graphitic carbon content and the high crystallinity of HPHT are evident from Raman spectra acquired using visible wavelength excitation (λexcit = 633 nm) as well as carbon K-edge X-ray absorption spectra where the signature of a core-hole exciton is observed. Both spectroscopic features are similar to those of chemical vapor deposited (CVD) diamond but differ significantly from the spectra of detonation nanodiamond. The importance of these findings to the functionalization of nanodiamond surfaces for biological labeling applications is discussed.
We investigate the aerobic oxidation of high-pressure, high-temperature nanodiamonds (5-50 nm dimensions) using a combination of carbon and oxygen K-edge X-ray absorption, wavelength-dependent X-ray photoelectron, and vibrational spectroscopies. Oxidation at 575 °C for 2 h eliminates graphitic carbon contamination (>98%) and produces nanocrystals with hydroxyl functionalized surfaces as well as a minor component (<5%) of carboxylic anhydrides. The low graphitic carbon content and the high crystallinity of HPHT are evident from Raman spectra acquired using visible wavelength excitation (λexcit = 633 nm) as well as carbon K-edge X-ray absorption spectra where the signature of a core-hole exciton is observed. Both spectroscopic features are similar to those of chemical vapor deposited (CVD) diamond but differ significantly from the spectra of detonation nanodiamond. The importance of these findings to the functionalization of nanodiamond surfaces for biological labeling applications is discussed.
Nitrogen vacancy centers
(NVCs) in diamond have great promise for
applications in quantum computing, fluorescence labeling, and electric
and magnetic field sensing.[1−10] Several exciting advances have been recently reported including
nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on nanometer length scales[11,12] and fluorescence imaging with 20 nm spatial resolution.[13] When NVCs are embedded in diamond nanocrystals
(NDs), they can be dispersed on biological samples and their fluorescence
tracked continuously over many hours.[14−17] To transform fluorescent NDs
into targeted biological probes, methods are needed to functionalize
their surfaces with solubilizing ligands and biological tags that
afford labeling specificity.Most strategies to functionalize
NDs have been developed using
detonation nanodiamond (DND) that is prepared in a “bottom-up”
explosion synthesis. However, DNDs generally do not support NVCs,
and recent efforts to prepare soluble diamond probes have focused
on NDs that are fabricated in a “top-down” fashion from
bulk chemical vapor deposited (CVD) diamond[18] or high-pressure, high-temperature diamond (HPHT) where less is
known about surface structure (Figure 1). DND
surfaces are known to be terminated by many types of functional groups
including carboxylic acid moieties, which are abundant[19−21] and can be used to form amide bonds[21−23] or to graft layers of
silicon dioxide after reduction.[24] However,
DND surface structure is distinct from oxidized bulk single crystal
diamonds, where alcohol and ether functionalities are typically found.[25] Thus, it remains an interesting and important
question whether surfaces of oxidized HPHT NDs and other nanocrystals
produced by “top-down” fabrication methods will have
surface chemistry akin to bulk crystals or DND.
Figure 1
Bulk HPHT diamond is
type Ib and contains approximately 100–200
ppm of nitrogen that produces its yellow color. Ball milling and size
fractionation yield a black powder composed of nanometer scale crystallites
ranging in size from 5 to 50 nm. Graphitic and amorphous carbons can
be removed from unoxidized HPHT NDs by aerobic oxidation, causing
the powders to become progressively lighter in tone as the oxidation
temperature increases to 575 °C.
Bulk HPHT diamond is
type Ib and contains approximately 100–200
ppm of nitrogen that produces its yellow color. Ball milling and size
fractionation yield a black powder composed of nanometer scale crystallites
ranging in size from 5 to 50 nm. Graphitic and amorphous carbons can
be removed from unoxidized HPHT NDs by aerobic oxidation, causing
the powders to become progressively lighter in tone as the oxidation
temperature increases to 575 °C.Commercially available samples of DND and HPHT NDs are complex
mixtures of diamond and graphitic carbons. High temperature oxidation
of this mixture is typically performed prior to surface functionalization
or photophysical investigations to selectively remove the graphitic
carbons. The oxidation step produces a number of desirable properties:
(1) reduction of background fluorescence, (2) termination of the ND
surface with carbon–oxygen functionalities useful for derivatization,
(3) increased solubility in aqueous environments afforded by readily
ionized surface functionalities, and (4) in the case of HPHT NDs stabilization
of the NV– charge state.[22] Using a suite of spectroscopic techniques and transmission electron
microscopy, we investigate the structure of HPHT NDs after aerobic
oxidation and demonstrate that their surface structure is similar
to chemical vapor deposited (CVD) single crystal diamond and distinct
from DND. Hence, functionalization strategies that target alcohols
would improve soluble magnetic resonance probes fabricated using “top-down”
strategies.
Results and Discussion
HPHT NDs used in this study
were aerobically oxidized at temperatures
between 475 and 575 °C to remove graphitic carbons. At these
temperatures the oxidation proceeds quickly (2–24 h) and selectively,
preserving a high fraction of the starting diamond. Complete combustion
is observed at higher temperatures and longer times. Diamonds were
analyzed before and after oxidation using transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) at accelerating voltages from 80 to 200 keV. Irregularly shaped
crystallites are observed with a broad distribution of dimensions
in the range of 5–50 nm (Figure 2 and Figure S4). A minor amount of amorphous carbon
was visible that is eliminated by aerobic oxidation of the samples
prior to imaging (2 h at 575 °C). Crystallite sizes used in this
study were measured with TEM and found to center around 13 and 15
nm before and after aerobic oxidation (Figure
S4).[26] Figure 2A–C shows several crystallites where an abundance of [111]
derived terraces, edges, and facets are visible. Using an environmental
TEM, we monitored oxidative etching of the diamond in real time by
introducing oxygen into the sample chamber (Figure 2D and Supporting Information).
Etching of the diamond occurred in a layer by layer fashion that revealed
a [111] facet, a pattern observed previously in studies of bulk diamond.[27] Thus, we conclude that HPHT NDs are terminated
by a significant fraction of [111] facets produced by crystallite
cleavage during ball-milling and aerobic oxidation.[28−30]
Figure 2
(A) TEM image (200 keV)
of an oxidized HPHT ND with (111) and (111̅)
facets at ∼70°, very near the theoretical angle of 70.5°.
(B) A higher magnification image of a crystallite edge with (1̅11)
termination. White lines highlight the (111) and (1̅11) planes
that are indexed to θ = 70.5°. A lattice spacing of 0.210
nm is consistent with that predicted for 111 interplanar spacing.
Amorphous carbon is also visible on the nanocrystals edge. (C) Aberration-corrected
image taken with 80 keV accelerating voltage give enhanced atomic
resolution. Inset shows electron diffraction with (200) and (111)
reflections consistent with a zone axis along [110]. Lattice fringes
of 0.182 and 0.217 nm are near that expected for the (200) and (111)
lattice spacing. (D) One frame from a movie of in situ oxidation where etching occurs along the [111] and [001] facet directions
(see Supporting Information for full movie).
(A) TEM image (200 keV)
of an oxidized HPHT ND with (111) and (111̅)
facets at ∼70°, very near the theoretical angle of 70.5°.
(B) A higher magnification image of a crystallite edge with (1̅11)
termination. White lines highlight the (111) and (1̅11) planes
that are indexed to θ = 70.5°. A lattice spacing of 0.210
nm is consistent with that predicted for 111 interplanar spacing.
Amorphous carbon is also visible on the nanocrystals edge. (C) Aberration-corrected
image taken with 80 keV accelerating voltage give enhanced atomic
resolution. Inset shows electron diffraction with (200) and (111)
reflections consistent with a zone axis along [110]. Lattice fringes
of 0.182 and 0.217 nm are near that expected for the (200) and (111)
lattice spacing. (D) One frame from a movie of in situ oxidation where etching occurs along the [111] and [001] facet directions
(see Supporting Information for full movie).Removal of graphitic carbon impurities
after oxidation at temperatures
from 475 to 575 °C is conveniently monitored using UV-Raman and
visible-Raman spectroscopies (λexcit = 325 and 633
nm) (Figure 3). After 2 h of oxidation at 575
°C, the broad vibrational bands from graphitic carbons decrease
in intensity, leaving a single sharp signal that is characteristic
of cubic phase diamond (ν = 1332 cm–1, fwhm
= 5.1 cm–1).[31] This spectrum
is nearly indistinguishable from that of bulk CVD diamond, except
for a slightly broader line width (5.1 cm–1 vs 2.8
cm–1), implying that HPHT NDs have long-range crystallographic
order. In comparison, the UV-Raman spectrum of DNDs oxidized for 5
h at 475 °C is broad and red-shifted (ν = 1327 cm–1, fwhm = 19.2 cm–1) and displays a tail on the
low-energy side of the diamond vibration. These effects have been
previously ascribed to lattice strain, defects, and phonon confinement
(Figure 3).[32] In
addition, signals derived from graphitic carbons remain after oxidation
(1500–1800 cm–1).
Figure 3
(A) Visible-Raman spectrum
(λexcitation = 633
nm) of HPHT NDs aerobically oxidized at 575 °C for 2 h. (B) UV-Raman
spectra (λexcitation = 325 nm) of HPHT NDs aerobically
oxidized at 575 °C for 2 h, (C) unoxidized HPHT NDs, and (D)
DNDs after 2 h of aerobic oxidation at 475 °C.
(A) Visible-Raman spectrum
(λexcitation = 633
nm) of HPHT NDs aerobically oxidized at 575 °C for 2 h. (B) UV-Raman
spectra (λexcitation = 325 nm) of HPHT NDs aerobically
oxidized at 575 °C for 2 h, (C) unoxidized HPHT NDs, and (D)
DNDs after 2 h of aerobic oxidation at 475 °C.Raman spectroscopy at visible wavelengths is not
typically used
to analyze NDs because absorption, fluorescence, and resonance enhancement
of disordered graphitic carbons obscure the signal from diamond. As
a result, Raman spectra of DNDs have only been obtained in the UV
where there is stronger resonance enhancement of the diamond signal.[32] However, oxidized HPHT NDs produced in this
study showed a sharp signal from diamond at visible wavelengths (λexcit = 633 nm). Several vibrational modes from graphitic carbons
are also visible including signals at 1280, 1370, 1400, 1620, and
1660 cm–1. These features are distinct in line width
and energy from the broader band of graphitic carbons prior to oxidation
as well as those found in DND samples (Figure 3).[33,34] We attribute these signals to olefinic species
formed at ND surfaces during the ball-milling and/or aerobic oxidation
processes. Undercoordinated atoms on diamond surfaces are known to
reorganize producing chains of sp2-hybridzed carbons known
as a Pandey reconstruction.[35−37] A theoretical study predicts
the vibrational modes of the C(111)-(2 × 1) and C(110)-(2 ×
1) reconstructions to appear in the range of 1100–1500 cm–1, consistent with the signals in our Raman data.[38] However, these reconstructions typically occur
above 900 °C on bulk diamond facets and requires an effect such
as the surface tension of the nanocrystallite to lower the barrier
if these signals are to be explained by a C(111)-(2 × 1) reconstruction.[35]Raman bands at 1620 and 1660 cm–1 are near the
frequency of the E2g mode of olefinic carbons that result
from in-plane motion of pairs of sp2 atoms. In diamond-like
carbons this band shifts from the frequency of crystalline graphite
(1581 cm–1) toward the frequency of isolated sp2 dimers (1630 cm–1) as the graphitic domains
shrink and the sp3 content increases.[39] The frequency of this band in our oxidized samples suggests
that the graphitic carbons do not cluster to form extended domains.
Similarly, the lack of a D band (1370 cm–1) arising
from the A1g breathing mode argues against the presence
of complete six-membered rings. These bands are therefore most consistent
with sp2 centers that form chains.[40] A previous study of DND concluded that Raman bands at 1620 and 1660
cm–1 can arise from O–H stretching modes
of surface alcohols or acids, but deuterium exchange reactions (−OH
→ −OD) on our samples did not affect the Raman spectrum,
arguing against this assignment.[41] Despite
the relatively large intensity of these bands in the visible-Raman
spectrum, X-ray absorption and photoelectron spectroscopy indicate
that graphitic carbons are found in low abundance compared to other
oxygen containing functional groups (see below).To investigate
both the graphitic and oxygen containing functionalities
in greater detail, we turned to K-edge NEXAFS spectroscopy (Figure 4A,B). Carbon and oxygen K-edge NEXAFS probe the
unoccupied density of states with p-orbital character. At these energies
and in total electron yield mode, the technique has a 5–10
nm probe depth and can be used to measure the types and ratios of
functional groups.[42] For example, carbon
K-edge spectra of unoxidized and oxidized HPHT NDs show several pre-edge
features including π*(C=C) (∼285.0
eV) and π*(C=O) (286.7 and 288.3 eV) resonances
(Figure 4A). The energies of the π*(C=O) resonances (286.7 and 288.3 eV) are consistent
with those expected for carboxylic acids or acid anhydrides rather
than other carbonyls.[43,44] A signal of low intensity (530.0
eV) in the oxygen K-edge spectra is distinct from the σ*(C–O) and σ*(C=O) shape resonances
and at an energy expected for carbonyl species (π*(C=O)) including ketones, acids, and acid anhydrides (Figure 4B).[43−45] While in principle the (C–O):(C=O)
functional group ratio can be measured by integrating the peak areas
in this spectrum, it is complicated by overlap of σ*(C–O) and σ*(C=O) shape resonances in the 536–540
eV range. However, the much weaker intensity of the π*(C=O) signal compared to the σ*(C–O) and σ*(C=O) resonances supports a surface primarily terminated
by singly bonded C–O bonded functional groups such as alcohols
and ethers and minor amounts of carbonyls and graphitic carbons.
Figure 4
Carbon
(A) and oxygen (B) K-edge NEXAFS spectra of HPHT NDs oxidized
at 575 and 475 °C (red) compared with unoxidized HPHT nanocrystals
and aerobically oxidized DND. The sharp signal from a core–hole
exciton is visible at 289.0 eV in samples of HPHT and absent in samples
of DND. Signals from π*(C=C) and π*(C=O) (∼285.0, 286.7, and 288.3 eV) decrease
as the oxidation temperature is increased. Oxygen K-edge spectra show
a decrease in the π*(C=O) resonances at 530
and 534.3 eV as the oxidation temperature increases. (C) Wavelength-dependent
XPS spectra of a partially oxidized sample (500 °C, 2 h) showing
the expected change in the ratio of signals from bulk (C–C)
and surface (C=C, C–O, C=O) species as the excitation
energy increases (410 → 950 eV) and the electron mean free
path of the photoelectrons increases. (D) XPS spectra of HPHT nanocrystals
oxidized at 575 °C. The spectra are dominated by signals from
bulk diamond (C–C) and alcohol and ether functional groups
(C–O). A minor signal from (C=O) is visible, while signals
from (C=C) were not detected.
Carbon
(A) and oxygen (B) K-edge NEXAFS spectra of HPHT NDs oxidized
at 575 and 475 °C (red) compared with unoxidized HPHT nanocrystals
and aerobically oxidized DND. The sharp signal from a core–hole
exciton is visible at 289.0 eV in samples of HPHT and absent in samples
of DND. Signals from π*(C=C) and π*(C=O) (∼285.0, 286.7, and 288.3 eV) decrease
as the oxidation temperature is increased. Oxygen K-edge spectra show
a decrease in the π*(C=O) resonances at 530
and 534.3 eV as the oxidation temperature increases. (C) Wavelength-dependent
XPS spectra of a partially oxidized sample (500 °C, 2 h) showing
the expected change in the ratio of signals from bulk (C–C)
and surface (C=C, C–O, C=O) species as the excitation
energy increases (410 → 950 eV) and the electron mean free
path of the photoelectrons increases. (D) XPS spectra of HPHT nanocrystals
oxidized at 575 °C. The spectra are dominated by signals from
bulk diamond (C–C) and alcohol and ether functional groups
(C–O). A minor signal from (C=O) is visible, while signals
from (C=C) were not detected.Two signatures of crystalline diamond are also clearly visible
in the carbon K-edge spectra including the sharp signal of a core–hole
exciton (289.0 eV) as well the second bandgap in the diamond band
structure (302.1 eV) (Figure 4A). The excitonic
feature, in particular, is characteristic of high quality diamond
and a fingerprint of its periodic electronic structure.[46,47] While this signal has been observed in nanocrystalline diamond films
(2–100 nm grain size), this is the first observation in colloidal
diamond nanocrystals.[48] This signature
is absent from previous NEXAFS studies of DND nanocrystals as well
as our own measurements (Figure 4A) because
of its more defected lattice.[19,49] This observation together
with the Raman features clearly demonstrates the higher crystallinity
of HPHT ND compared to DND.NEXAFS can be used to monitor the
amount of graphitic carbon present
before and after aerobic oxidation.[50] By
integrating the π*(C=C) (284.0–286.0
eV) and σ*(C–C) resonances (293.0–302.0
eV) and comparing it with the analogous ratio from a reference spectrum
of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), the ratio of graphitic
and sp3-hybridized carbons can be estimated (see Supporting Information).[42,50,51] For example, as the oxidation temperature
is increased (475 → 575 °C) and progressively greater
amounts of graphitic carbons are removed, the π*(C=C) resonance decreases compared to the σ*(C–C) resonance.[43−45] Integrating the spectra shows that HPHT NDs are composed
of 87% sp3-hybridized carbon that increases to 95% after
2 h of aerobic oxidation at 575 °C. However, this estimate is
a lower limit because the NEXAFS measurement is surface-sensitive;
the probe depth is estimated at 5–10 nm and may not include
all bulk diamond signal.[52] This high diamond
content is on par with other highly purified nanodiamond samples.[19]To obtain a quantitative measure of the
relative abundances of
the C–O, C=O, and C=C functional groups, we turned
to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. By tuning the excitation wavelength,
we influence the photoelectron kinetic energy and its escape depth.
For example, using 410 eV synchrotron radiation, photoelectrons derived
from the carbon 1s orbitals escape with 125 eV of kinetic energy and
have a mean free path of ∼0.5 nm, enough to escape from the
first few lattice planes (2–3 lattice planes along the [111]
direction). Photoelectrons generated with 910 eV photons, on the other
hand, have increased mean free paths (∼1.0 nm) such that changes
in signal intensity as a function of photon energy can be used to
distinguish signals from the surface functional groups and the signal
from the bulk diamond lattice. Typical spectra after oxidation at
500 °C contain signals from graphitic carbons (282.5 eV), C–O
(286.0 eV), and C=O (289.0 eV) functional groups as well as
bulk diamond (284.5–285.0 eV) (Figure 4C).[53] The signal from graphitic carbon
and C–O and C=O functional groups smoothly increase
in intensity as the photoexcitation energy is lowered, as is expected
from a surface species (Figure 4C). The signal
from graphitic carbons is not detectable in samples oxidized at 575
°C, and instead the spectrum is dominated by bulk diamond and
oxygenated functional groups (Figure 4D). Spectral
deconvolution indicates that carboxyl carbons make up a small fraction
of surface functionalities (∼2%), while the majority of the
signal derives from functional groups with single C–O bonds.
While the precise amounts of each signal will be influenced by the
sample roughness,[54] the lack of signal
from graphitic carbons and carboxyls unambiguously demonstrates that
they are not the dominant surface functionality on HPHT NDs after
2 h of oxidation at 575 °C.After 2 h of aerobic oxidation
at 575 °C singly bonded oxygen
containing functional groups are the dominant surface species; however,
differentiating between carboxylic acids and anhydrides or ethers
and alcohols was not possible using the binding energies alone. Diffuse
reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), on the
other hand, provides a complementary method to assign the types of
functional groups and adsorbates present. DRIFTS spectra clearly showed
a number of signals that derive from O–H and C–O vibrations,
including (1) the stretching vibrations of adsorbed water and hydroxyls
(νO–H = 3000–3700 cm–1), (2) the bending mode of water (δO–H =
1630 cm–1), (3) a dominant signal from C–O
single bonds in the fingerprint region (νC–O = 1050–1150 cm–1), and (4) a weak signal
from a carbonyl (νC–O = 1790 cm–1) (Figure 5). The νO–H stretching band is similar in intensity to previously studied diamond
powders and is primarily due to adsorbed water.[55] Water was desorbed in situ by heating
the sample in an infrared cell under a flowing N2 atmosphere
(Figure 5, inset) leaving remaining O–H
signal that we assign to surface hydroxyls (νO–H ∼ 3650–3700 cm–1). Beyond 400 °C
surface functional groups begin to desorb as CO and CO2 in line with previous reports (see Supporting
Information).[56] In addition to the
intense signals from surface bound hydroxyls, a weak carbonyl vibration
at 1790 cm–1 falls within the range expected for
acid anhydrides (1750–1800 cm–1),[24,41,56] although strained ketones such
as cyclobutanone can also appear at this frequency.[57] The strong bands in the O–H and fingerprint regions
clearly indicate that the dominant surface functionality is a hydroxyl
group—a conclusion that is consistent with the XPS and NEXAFS
analysis. However, we cannot rule out the presence of ethers, which
may also contribute to the band in the fingerprint region as has been
proposed by others.[58−61]
Figure 5
DRIFTS
spectra of HPHT NDs oxidized at 575 °C (top), 475 °C
(middle), and prior to oxidation (bottom). Reflectance intensities
have been modified by the Kubelka–Munk relation to make them
proportional to concentration. Inset shows spectra acquired at different
temperatures under flowing nitrogen, where desorption of water from
the nanodiamond surface is responsible for the decrease in intensity
of the stretching v(O–H) = 3000–3700
cm–1 and bending δ(O–H) =
1630 cm–1 modes. Remaining signal near v(O–H) = 3000–3400 cm–1 is consistent with remaining surface bound hydroxyl functionalities
and adsorbed water.
DRIFTS
spectra of HPHT NDs oxidized at 575 °C (top), 475 °C
(middle), and prior to oxidation (bottom). Reflectance intensities
have been modified by the Kubelka–Munk relation to make them
proportional to concentration. Inset shows spectra acquired at different
temperatures under flowing nitrogen, where desorption of water from
the nanodiamond surface is responsible for the decrease in intensity
of the stretching v(O–H) = 3000–3700
cm–1 and bending δ(O–H) =
1630 cm–1 modes. Remaining signal near v(O–H) = 3000–3400 cm–1 is consistent with remaining surface bound hydroxyl functionalities
and adsorbed water.Previous studies of DND
attribute vibrational bands in the carbonyl
region to carboxylic acids and conclude they are the dominant surface
functionality. However, in our case, the relatively weak signal in
this region is likely due to carboxylic anhydrides. In addition to
the carbonyl vibration at 1790 cm–1, other stretching
modes consistent with acid anhydrides are observed at 940, 1290, and
1370 cm–1, the intensity of which correlates with
the signal at 1790 cm–1. For example, if HPHT NDs
are oxidized with persulfuric acid prior to aerobic oxidation at 575
°C, both sets of signals are nearly eliminated, leaving only
vibrational signatures from alcohols (Figure S8). Using the relative extinction of the C–O vibrational transition
from tertiary alcohols and the symmetric stretch of carboxylic anhydrides,
we estimate that the (C–O):(C=O) ratio is ∼30:1
after 2 h of aerobic oxidation at 575 °C and ∼90:1 after
persulfuric acid treatment and aerobic oxidation.[62] These estimates are consistent with the low carbonyl content
measured by XPS above (Figure 4). The low abundance
of acid anhydrides maybe due to the high oxidation temperature used
in our study, which is known to cause decarboxylation from diamond
surfaces in the range of 400–700 °C.[56] Indeed, the signals from carbonyls decrease in the carbon
and oxygen NEXAFS, XPS, and DRIFTS spectra when the temperature of
oxidation is increased from 475 to 575 °C (Figures 4 and 5 and Figure
S6). However, carboxyls are minor functional groups on unoxidized
HPHT NDs as well as those oxidized at lower temperatures, while DND
maintains a higher carboxylate coverage under similar oxidation conditions.The distinct surface termination of DND and HPHT NDs may stem from
different underlying crystallinity or crystallite size. While the
Raman and NEXAFS spectra of HPHT NDs display a sharp diamond vibration
and a core–hole exciton, the same spectra of DND are broad
and red-shifted and lack the signal from a core–hole exciton.
Both observations imply that DND has a more defected structure. These
observations may explain why DNDs generally do not support NVCs, while
oxidized HPHT NDs, including those prepared in this study, support
NVCs in the NV– state that can be manipulated with
optical electron spin resonance methods (see Supporting
Information). HPHT NDs used in this study are also larger (13–16
nm) than typical DNDs (∼5 nm) and have larger area facets and
fewer edge and vertex atoms that may influence the functional group
types.Together the NEXAFS, XPS, and DRIFTS measurements support
a consistent
picture; aerobically oxidized HPHT NDs are primarily terminated with
hydroxyls, rather than carboxylic anhydrides which are present in
<5% abundance; olefinic functionalities are the smallest component
despite the intensity of their vibrational bands in the visible-Raman
spectrum. The abundance of alcohols is consistent with studies of
(111)-terminated single crystals oxidized in the presence of H2O where hydroxyl termination has been observed experimentally
and predicted by computational models.[25,27] The surfaces
of HPHT NDs are similar to bulk diamond surfaces, and efforts to functionalize
HPHT NDs and other diamond nanostructures fabricated from bulk material
using “top-down” approaches must address the hydroxyl
termination to append a high coverage of surface ligands. Among possible
methods silanization of ND surfaces has been reported and may be facilitated
by the hydroxylated surface.[63,64]
Conclusions
The
highly crystalline structure of HPHT NDs is apparent from the
energy and line width of the Raman spectrum, high resolution TEM images,
and the signature of a core–hole exciton in carbon NEXAFS spectra.
Moreover, we show that their surfaces are terminated with oxygenated
functional groups analogous to those found on single crystal [111],
[100], and [110] facets. Both observations indicate that after 2 h
of aerobic oxidation at 575 °C the surface structure of HPHT
NDs is very similar to bulk single crystals where hydroxyl and possibly
ethers are the dominant functional groups. Graphitic carbons are present
in very low quantities compared to the oxygenated functional groups
(<2%), leaving a sample whose Raman spectrum could be measured
using visible wavelength excitation. Each of these observations support
a structure that is distinct from DND and indicate that new functionalization
strategies are needed that target the singly bonded C–O–H
functional groups. Advances along these lines will aid in the transformation
of HPHT NDs and CVD derived nanostructures into versatile biological
labeling agents and particularly those that utilize NVCs for magnetic
and electric field sensing.
Experimental Section
Materials and Methods
HPHT ND powders (monocrystalline
diamond powder MSY 0–0.05 μm, Microdiamant AG) and detonation
nanodiamond powders (cluster diamond XP 0.25–1 μm, Microdiamant
AG), bulk HPHT diamond crystals (Van Moppes, FRD-A 40/50 and SK-90
20/25), and deuterium oxide (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (99.9%
CAS 7889-20-0)) were used as received. Highly ordered pyrolitic graphite
(Ted Pella Inc. #626-2) was freshly cleaved with Scotch tape prior
to analysis. Single crystal type IIa CVD diamond terminated at a (100)
facet (Element Six, Frankfurt, Germany) was submerged in persulfuric
acid solution (3:1 sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide) for 10 min,
rinsed with 18 MΩ water, dried under stream of nitrogen, and
stored in a closed container in air prior to analysis. Silicon wafers
with a native SiO2 oxide layer (P-type; 1 Ω·cm,
SQI, San Jose, CA) were washed with persulfuric acid solution prior
to use.
Oxidation of Diamond Nanocrystals
Nanodiamond powder
was placed in a ceramic boat, loaded into a tube furnace, left open
to the air, and heated to the desired temperature (475–575
°C) for 2 h. After cooling to room temperature, oxidized HPHT
NDs could be dispersed in water, methanol, or ethanol (0.1–1.0
mg/mL) with sonication for 5 min at 10% power using a tip sonicator
(Branson Sonifier 450). In some cases, nanodiamond powders were first
oxidized in persulfuric acid (100 mg of HPHT NDs per 60 mL of 3:1,
H2SO4:H2O2) by heating
the suspension to 80 °C for 12 h in a round-bottom flask equipped
with a reflux condensror. Vigorous bubbling was observed for 30 min
and then gradually subsided. ND solids were separated via centrifugation
and rinsed with 18 MΩ water three times prior to aerobic oxidation
as described above.
HRTEM Characterization and in Situ Oxidation
of HPHT Nanodiamonds
Colloidal dispersions of nanodiamonds
in water or methanol were drop-cast onto ultrathin holey carbon grids
(Ted Pella #08124). Standard HRTEM was performed on a JEOL JEM2100F
at the Center for Functional Nanomaterials at Brookhaven National
Laboratory. The accelerating voltage was 200 keV, and the sample was
at 0° tilt during imaging. In situ oxidation
of HPHT NDs was performed on an environmental HRTEM microscope (FEI
Titan 80-300) at an accelerating voltage of 80 keV with aberration
correction. Oxygen was introduced into the imaging chamber at a pressure
of 1 × 10–6 Torr and then sealed. Images were
collected at a rate of 4 frames/s with continuous manual focusing.
UV- and Visible-Raman Spectroscopy of Oxidized Diamond Nanocrystals
and Control Samples
Samples were prepared by placing 3 mg
of HPHT ND powder between two glass slides and lightly pressing the
slides together to flatten the sample for normal spectral aquisition.
Visible-Raman scattering spectroscopy was performed on a Renishaw
inVia microscope with a diode laser at 633 nm and a 1800/mm grating
and a spectral range of 900–2100 cm–1. UV-Raman
at 325 nm and visible-Raman scattering at 633 nm were performed on
a Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRam Aramis microscope with UV and visible objectives
of 20×. Spectra were collected by averaging 20–40 spectra
from 5 s exposures at 1–20 μW/cm2 with using
a 20× Olympus objective. Sample location and focus were manually
controlled, and Raman scattering calibration was performed on an internal
Si wafer. Raman spectra background were subtracted and then normalized
to the diamond peak intensity.
Deuterium Exchange and
Vacuum Annealing of HPHT NDs
ND powders (50 mg) were placed
into a 25 mL three-neck flask and
dried under vacuum (5 mTorr) at room temperature. 10 mL of D2O was then injected into the three-neck flask under Ar, and the mixture
was sonicated for 3 min, stirred for an additional 10 min, and then
dried under vacuum. This procedure was repeated three times, and the
dry powder was brought into an inert atmosphere glovebox where it
was immediately sealed under nitrogen in a Linkham THMS600 stage.
The stage was continuously purged with N2 during the acquisition
of Raman spectra.
NEXAFS and Wavelength-Dependent XPS
Samples were prepared
on gold-coated Si wafers with a native oxide layer (#720–204;
P-type; 1 Ω·cm) by drop-casting an aqueous dispersion of
nanodiamonds (1 mg/mL) and then drying the sample at 80 °C under
flowing argon. Samples were covered by a glass dish and stored in
clean Teflon containers prior to spectroscopic investigations. Samples
were fixed on a machined Al sample bar with Cu tape. NEXAFS and XPS
measurements were performed at beamline 10-1 at the Stanford Synchrotron
Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, and at
beamline U7A at the National Synchrotron Light Source using spot sizes
of <1 mm2 and ∼1.5 mm2, respectively.
At 10-1, carbon K-edge XAS was measured in total electron yield (TEY)
mode using 30 × 50 um slits. TEY mode probes approximately 5–10
nm of sample depth. All experiments were conducted under ultrahigh-vacuum
conditions (∼5 × 10–9 Torr). After focusing
the optics, the reference absorption intensity of the incoming X-ray
beam was measured using a sample of gold coated mesh and used to correct
for beam instability. Carbon K-edge NEXAFS spectra were collected
at U7A in partial electron yield (PEY) mode using a grid bias of −200
V. Oxygen K-edge was also performed in partial electron yield mode
with a grid bias of −300 V. NEXAFS data were collected at an
incident electric field vector of 54.7°. Spectra were treated
with a linear pre-edge background subtraction from a region before
the absorption edge of carbon and oxygen at 260–280 and 510–530
eV, respectively. A post-edge normalization was also performed in
the continuum region at 340 eV for carbon and 580 eV for oxygen. XPS
spectra were measured at beamline 10-1 with a hemispherical electron
spectrometer (SES-R3000, VG-Scienta) using a total energy resolution
better than 100 meV. Incident X-rays were selected at 410, 520, 650,
and 950 eV with a spherical grating monochromator. Energy calibration
was performed using the signal from the gold substrate (Au 4f5/2 = 85.0 eV) after argon ion sputtering under ultrahigh-vacuum
conditions (5 × 10–8 Torr) within a commercial
5700 PHI electronics X-ray photoelectron spectrometer using identical
samples. Samples were prepared on substrates freshly cleaned in persulfuric
acid solution and deposited from 18 MΩ water to minimize contamination
from adventitious hydrocarbons. Details of escape depth estimations
and peak fitting are described in the Supporting
Information.
Temperature-Dependent DRIFTS
Nanodiamond
powder (10
mg) and anhydrous KBr (500 mg) were ground in a mortar and pestle
and loaded in the reflectance cup and leveled with a spatula. DRIFTS
was performed on a Thermo-Nicolet 7800 FTIR equipped with a liquid
nitrogen cooled MCT detector, a KBr beamsplitter, and a Praying Mantis
diffuse reflectance apparatus that can be heated under vacuum or flowing
gas. Variable temperature spectra (25–700 °C) were acquired
after allowing the temperature to equilibrate for 20 min. Spectra
of a KBr blank were acquired at each temperature and used to correct
the data. A linear background correction was applied, and the data
transformed to be linear with respect to concentration of the analyte
according to Kubelka and Munk (see Supporting
Information for more detail).
Thermogravimetric Mass
Spectroscopy (TGA-MS)
Temperature-programmed
desorption (TPD) studies were performed on a TG 209 F1 IRIS from Netzsch
with an Ar carrier gas from 25 to 1000 °C at ambient pressure.
TPD was carried out at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min and tracked by
a thermocouple attached to the aluminum carrier. 10 mg of highly purified
HPHT ND powder (575 °C for 2 h) was loaded into an alumina sample
carrier and introduced into the TGA-MS. Mass spectroscopy of the ionized
products was tracked at mass–charge values of 1 (H), 2 (H2), 12 (C), 18 (H2O), 28 (CO), 32 (O2), and 44 (CO2). These measurements were carried out at
the analytical and diagnostics laboratory at SUNY Binghamton.
Authors: P Maletinsky; S Hong; M S Grinolds; B Hausmann; M D Lukin; R L Walsworth; M Loncar; A Yacoby Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Pavel G Baranov; Alexandra A Soltamova; Daniel O Tolmachev; Nikolay G Romanov; Roman A Babunts; Fedor M Shakhov; Sergey V Kidalov; Alexandr Y Vul'; Georgy V Mamin; Sergei B Orlinskii; Nikolai I Silkin Journal: Small Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Ivan Rehor; Jitka Slegerova; Jan Kucka; Vladimir Proks; Vladimira Petrakova; Marie-Pierre Adam; François Treussart; Stuart Turner; Sara Bals; Pavel Sacha; Miroslav Ledvina; Amy M Wen; Nicole F Steinmetz; Petr Cigler Journal: Small Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: L T Hall; G C G Beart; E A Thomas; D A Simpson; L P McGuinness; J H Cole; J H Manton; R E Scholten; F Jelezko; Jörg Wrachtrup; S Petrou; L C L Hollenberg Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sinan Karaveli; Ophir Gaathon; Abraham Wolcott; Reyu Sakakibara; Or A Shemesh; Darcy S Peterka; Edward S Boyden; Jonathan S Owen; Rafael Yuste; Dirk Englund Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 11.205