Literature DB >> 25435794

Item Response Theory Approaches to Harmonization and Research Synthesis.

Robert D Gibbons1, Marcelo Coca Perraillon1, Jong Bae Kim1.   

Abstract

The need to harmonize different outcome metrics is a common problem in research synthesis and economic evaluation of health interventions and technology. The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of multidimensional item response theory (IRT) to equate different scales which purport to measure the same construct at the item level. We provide an overview of multidimensional item response theory in general and the bi-factor model which is particularly relevant for applications in this area. We show how both the underlying true scores of two or more scales that are intended to measure the same latent variable can be equated and how the item responses from one scale can be used to predict the item responses for a scale that was not administered but are necessary for the purpose of economic evaluations. As an example, we show that a multidimensional IRT model predicts well both the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ-5D preference index from SF-12 data which cannot be directly used to perform an economic evaluation. Results based on multidimensional IRT performed well compared to traditional regression methods in this area. A general framework for harmonization of research instruments based on multidimensional IRT is described.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25435794      PMCID: PMC4244312          DOI: 10.1007/s10742-014-0125-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol        ISSN: 1387-3741


  10 in total

1.  Mapping the SF-12 to the EuroQol EQ-5D Index in a national US sample.

Authors:  Peter Franks; Erica I Lubetkin; Marthe R Gold; Daniel J Tancredi; Haomiao Jia
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 Health Survey in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  William F Lawrence; John A Fleishman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

Authors:  James W Shaw; Jeffrey A Johnson; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Vahram Ghushchyan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Probabilistic mapping of descriptive health status responses onto health state utilities using Bayesian networks: an empirical analysis converting SF-12 into EQ-5D utility index in a national US sample.

Authors:  Quang A Le; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Mapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessments.

Authors:  Louise Longworth; Donna Rowen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W H Thomas; D L Sackett
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping.

Authors:  Alastair M Gray; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Philip M Clarke
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Converting the SF-12 into the EQ-5D: an empirical comparison of methodologies.

Authors:  Ling-Hsiang Chuang; Paul Kind
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Allostatic load scoring using item response theory.

Authors:  Shelley H Liu; Robert-Paul Juster; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Julie Spicer
Journal:  Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-12-17

2.  Development of a computerized adaptive substance use disorder scale for screening and measurement: the CAT-SUD.

Authors:  Robert D Gibbons; Margarita Alegria; Sheri Markle; Larimar Fuentes; Liting Zhang; Rodrigo Carmona; Francisco Collazos; Ye Wang; Enrique Baca-García
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  You Say Tomato, I Say Radish: Can Brief Cognitive Assessments in the U.S. Health Retirement Study Be Harmonized With Its International Partner Studies?

Authors:  Lindsay C Kobayashi; Alden L Gross; Laura E Gibbons; Doug Tommet; R Elizabeth Sanders; Seo-Eun Choi; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Maria Glymour; Jennifer J Manly; Lisa F Berkman; Paul K Crane; Dan M Mungas; Richard N Jones
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  An evaluation of computerized adaptive testing for general psychological distress: combining GHQ-12 and Affectometer-2 in an item bank for public mental health research.

Authors:  Jan Stochl; Jan R Böhnke; Kate E Pickett; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Calibrating well-being, quality of life and common mental disorder items: psychometric epidemiology in public mental health research.

Authors:  Jan R Böhnke; Tim J Croudace
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 9.319

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.