Mi-Young Lee1, Hae-Yong Lee2, Min-Sik Yong2. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Therapy, Daegu Haany University, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of forward head posture (FHP) on proprioception by determining the cervical position-reposition error. [Subjects and Methods] A sample population was divided into two groups in accordance with the craniovertebral angle: the FHP group and the control group. We measured the craniovertebral angle, which is defined as the angle between a horizontal line passing through C7 and a line extending from the tragus of the ear to C7. The error value of the cervical position sense after cervical flexion, extension, and rotation was evaluated using the head repositioning accuracy test. [Results] There were significant differences in the error value of the joint position sense (cervical flexion, extension, and rotation) between the FHP and control groups. In addition, there was an inverse correlation between the craniovertebral angle and error value of the joint position sense. [Conclusion] FHP is associated with reduced proprioception. This result implies that the change in the muscle length caused by FHP decreases the joint position sense. Also, proprioception becomes worse as FHP becomes more severe.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of forward head posture (FHP) on proprioception by determining the cervical position-reposition error. [Subjects and Methods] A sample population was divided into two groups in accordance with the craniovertebral angle: the FHP group and the control group. We measured the craniovertebral angle, which is defined as the angle between a horizontal line passing through C7 and a line extending from the tragus of the ear to C7. The error value of the cervical position sense after cervical flexion, extension, and rotation was evaluated using the head repositioning accuracy test. [Results] There were significant differences in the error value of the joint position sense (cervical flexion, extension, and rotation) between the FHP and control groups. In addition, there was an inverse correlation between the craniovertebral angle and error value of the joint position sense. [Conclusion] FHP is associated with reduced proprioception. This result implies that the change in the muscle length caused by FHP decreases the joint position sense. Also, proprioception becomes worse as FHP becomes more severe.
Entities:
Keywords:
Forward head posture; Joint position sense; Proprioception
Proprioception provides sensory feedback from the body to the nervous system; therefore, it
contributes to the maintenance of optimal body alignment1,2,3,4). It includes several
submodalities such as joint position sense, kinesthesia, and sense of tension. Joint
position sense is used for not only recognizing the location of joints, but also for
measuring proprioception. Sense of tension is also used to measure proprioception, and
kinesthesia is considered to perceive active and passive movements2, 5). Various receptors
such as Ruffini receptors and Parcinian corpuscles are involved in the relay of information
to the central nervous system; however, the receptors in the muscle called muscle spindles,
particularly play a major role in proprioception2,
6). Changes in the muscle length caused
by poor posture for a sustained period of time result in musculoskeletal problems such as
forward head posture (FHP)7, 8).FHP is defined when that the head is anterior to a vertical line through the center of
gravity. It is considered a common postural disorder related to abnormalities in
musculoskeletal balance9, 10). Many studies have reported that FHP is correlated to
headache, temporomandibular disorders, myofacial pain syndrome, and abnormal scapular
movement. Neck pain resulting from a reduction not only in the length of muscle fibers, but
also in the capacity to generate tension in muscles is also attributed to FHP11,12,13). Since there are many mechanoreceptors in
the cervical muscle, the cervical region is considered to play a crucial role in the
transmission of information. Multifactorial problems in this region are mainly caused by
decreased joint sense7, 14, 15).Thus far, many studies have been conducted investigating the correlation between FHP and
pain8, 9,
16, 17). However, investigations concerning whether FHP can affect
proprioception are few. In the current study, we investigated the effect of FHP on
proprioception via the measurement of cervical position-reposition error.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Thirty-nine subjects with no history of neuromuscular disorder, fracture, or moderate or
severe scoliosis were recruited for this study. They were divided into two groups in
accordance with their craniovertebral angles: the FHP group (n=19) and the control group
(n=20) (Table 1). The craniovertebral angle of all subjects was measured, and when the angle
was less than 53°, subjects were included in the FHP group10, 11, 18). All subjects were informed of the purpose of this study and
provided their written informed consent prior to their participation. This study adhered to
the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Table 1.
General characteristics of the subjects
FHP group
Control group
Gender (M/F)
7/12
12/8
Age (years)
22.2±1.9
22.7±2.1
Height (cm)
166.0±7.4
169.7±7.3
Weight (kg)
63.8±12.3
64.0±12.6
Values are expressed as the Mean±SD.
Values are expressed as the Mean±SD.A very common method for the assessment of FHP is taking a picture of the lateral view of
the subject18, 19). This study used this method. The base of the camera was set at the
height of the subjects’ shoulder. The tragus of the ear was marked, and a plastic pointer
was taped to the skin overlying the spinous process of the C7 vertebra. We measured the
craniovertebral angle, which is defined as the angle between a horizontal line passing
through C7 and a line extending from the tragus of the ear to C7.The error value of cervical position sense was evaluated using a head repositioning
accuracy (HRA) test20,21,22,23). The HRA test was used to measure the difference between the start
(0 position) and return positions. A laser pointer attached to a cycling helmet was firmly
placed on the subjects’ heads. With their head in a natural resting position, the subjects
were requested to focus on a target that was positioned at eye level. All subjects were then
instructed to close their eyes, and the target was moved so that the laser pointer’s beam
projected onto the target. The subjects were told to memorize this position because this was
the reference position. Then they performed a cervical full flexion at their preferred speed
and held this position for 5 seconds. Following this, the subjects, with their eyes still
closed, were instructed to return to the reference position at their preferred speed. The
stopping point of the laser beam was marked with a dot. The absolute error value was
measured as the distance between the two marked points. Three repetitions of HRA to
reference 0 were done following the same procedure. The same procedure was followed to
assess extension, right rotation, and left rotation, which were performed at random.Data satisfying the normal distribution were examined with a parametric test. To assess the
differences in the error values of the joint position sense (cervical flexion, extension,
and rotation) between the FHP and control groups, the independent t-test was performed. In
addition, Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the degree of correlation
between the craniovertebral angle and the error value of each joint position sense.
Statistical analyze were performed using SPSS 14.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)
with a significance level of α=0.05.
RESULTS
There were significant differences between the error values of the joint position sense
(cervical flexion, extension, and rotations) of the FHP and control groups (p<0.05). In
addition, there was an inverse correlation between the craniovertebral angle and the error
values of position sense (p<0.05). The statistical values are shown in Tables 2 and
3.
Table 2.
Comparison of the cervical position sense errors of the FHP and control groups
(Unit: cm)
FHP group
Control group
Flexion
6.23±1.91*
4.14±1.74
Extension
6.23±2.20*
4.56±1.62
Right rotation
7.08±2.27*
5.13±1.51
Left rotation
5.60±2.03*
4.23±1.62
Values are expressed as the Mean±SD. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant
difference (p<0.05).
Table 3.
The correlations between the craniovertebral angle and the error values of
position sense
Flexion
Extension
Right rotation
Left rotation
Pearson’s correlation (r)
−0.597*
−0.421*
−0.428*
−0.389*
An asterisk (*) indicates a significant correlation (p<0.05).
Values are expressed as the Mean±SD. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant
difference (p<0.05).An asterisk (*) indicates a significant correlation (p<0.05).
DISCUSSION
Nowadays, the use of visual display terminals (VDT) of computers and smart phones in almost
all homes and organizations is very common24). Excessive use of VDTs results in musculoskeletal disorders. Among
these disorders, FHP is one of the most common conditions10, 16, 25).FHP is characterized by both an upper cervical extension and lower cervical flexion. These
changes in the cervical region may lead to musculoskeletal dysfunction such as an “upper
crossed syndrome” resulting from maintaining poor head position for a long duration of
time24, 26,
27). In addition, patients with FHP
commonly complain of neck and shoulder pain8). These pains cause a reduction of joint sense which influences
abnormal proprioception and poor postural balance7).The present study examined the position-reposition error of the cervical region in order to
investigate whether FHP affects joint position sense. Higher error rates were shown by the
group with FHP compared to the group without FHP. In all movements (flexion, extension, and
rotation), there were significant differences in repositioning errors between the two
groups. This result suggests that FHP affects joint position sense. The present study also
demonstrated that there is a correlation between the degree of FHP and joint position sense,
additionally suggesting that as FHP becomes more severe, joint position sense becomes
worse.Joint position sense is regarded as one of the components of proprioception. It is the
ability to recognize the joint location, and influences body alignment and joint
stability2,3,4,5). This sense is particularly influenced by receptors in the muscles
called muscle spindles. Muscle spindles have a primary ending which responds to changes in
the length and speed of muscle stretch as well as a secondary ending that responds only to
changes in the muscle length2, 28,29,30).In general, FHP leads to changes in the lengths of the anterior and posterior neck muscles,
and prolonged FHP causes sustained loading on the cervical spine8, 26). In this regard,
the results of the present study imply that changes in the lengths of muscles, as a result
of FHP, have a bad influence on the activity of the muscle spindles, and this is the reason
why poor joint position sense is induced by FHP. Further studies of the effect of
therapeutic exercise for improving position sense of subjects with FHP should be
encouraged.In conclusion, FHP is associated with reduced proprioception. This result implies that a
change in the muscle length caused by FHP affects decreases joint position sense.
Furthermore, the present study also found a correlation between FHP and proprioception. This
indicates that proprioception becomes worse as FHP becomes more severe.
Authors: Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Zachary A Smith; Olivia Kalmanson; Alexander J Ghanayem; William Sears Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 3.134