Andreia V Faria1, Rajani Sebastian2, Melissa Newhart2, Susumu Mori1, Argye E Hillis3. 1. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21287, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21287, USA ; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21287, USA ; Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Three variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), distinguished by language performance and supportive patterns of atrophy on imaging, have different clinical courses and the prognoses for specific functions. For example, semantic variant PPA alone is distinguished by impaired word comprehension. However, sometimes individuals with high education show normal performance on word comprehension tests early on, making classification difficult. Furthermore, as the condition progresses, individuals with other variants develop word comprehension deficits and other behavioral symptoms, making distinctions between variants less clear. Longitudinal brain imaging allows identification of specific areas of atrophy in individual patients, which identifies the location of disease in each patient. AIMS: We hypothesized that the areas of atrophy in individual PPA participants would be closely correlated with decline in word comprehension over time. We propose that areas where tissue volume is correlated with word comprehension are areas that: (1) are essential for word comprehension, (2) compensate for word comprehension in some individuals with semantic variant PPA early in the course; and (3) show atrophy in individuals with logopenic and nonfluent variant PPA only late in the course. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Fifteen participants with PPA (5 logopenic variant PPA; 8 semantic variant PPA; 2 nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA; mean age 67.8), underwent high resolution MRI and cognitive tests at least 9 months apart. The correlations between change in regional volumes and change in auditory word comprehension scores were investigated using Spearman test. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: While scores on auditory word comprehension at Time 1 were correlated with volume loss in right and left temporal pole and left inferior temporal cortex (areas of atrophy associated with semantic variant PPA), deterioration in auditory word comprehension from Time 1 to Time 2 was associated with individual atrophy in left middle temporal cortex, left angular gyrus, and right inferior and middle temporal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive atrophy in focal areas surrounding left temporal pole and left inferior temporal cortex, and right homologous area is closely related to progressive decline in auditory word comprehension. These correlations likely reflect areas that help support auditory word comprehension, effectively compensating for subtle deficits in some individuals early in the course of semantic variant PPA, as well as areas that are critical for auditory word comprehension that eventually atrophy in individuals with other variants of PPA. Individual patterns of atrophy also help us understand and predict the clinical course of individuals, such as associated behavioral or motor deficits.
BACKGROUND: Three variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), distinguished by language performance and supportive patterns of atrophy on imaging, have different clinical courses and the prognoses for specific functions. For example, semantic variant PPA alone is distinguished by impaired word comprehension. However, sometimes individuals with high education show normal performance on word comprehension tests early on, making classification difficult. Furthermore, as the condition progresses, individuals with other variants develop word comprehension deficits and other behavioral symptoms, making distinctions between variants less clear. Longitudinal brain imaging allows identification of specific areas of atrophy in individual patients, which identifies the location of disease in each patient. AIMS: We hypothesized that the areas of atrophy in individual PPA participants would be closely correlated with decline in word comprehension over time. We propose that areas where tissue volume is correlated with word comprehension are areas that: (1) are essential for word comprehension, (2) compensate for word comprehension in some individuals with semantic variant PPA early in the course; and (3) show atrophy in individuals with logopenic and nonfluent variant PPA only late in the course. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Fifteen participants with PPA (5 logopenic variant PPA; 8 semantic variant PPA; 2 nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA; mean age 67.8), underwent high resolution MRI and cognitive tests at least 9 months apart. The correlations between change in regional volumes and change in auditory word comprehension scores were investigated using Spearman test. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: While scores on auditory word comprehension at Time 1 were correlated with volume loss in right and left temporal pole and left inferior temporal cortex (areas of atrophy associated with semantic variant PPA), deterioration in auditory word comprehension from Time 1 to Time 2 was associated with individual atrophy in left middle temporal cortex, left angular gyrus, and right inferior and middle temporal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive atrophy in focal areas surrounding left temporal pole and left inferior temporal cortex, and right homologous area is closely related to progressive decline in auditory word comprehension. These correlations likely reflect areas that help support auditory word comprehension, effectively compensating for subtle deficits in some individuals early in the course of semantic variant PPA, as well as areas that are critical for auditory word comprehension that eventually atrophy in individuals with other variants of PPA. Individual patterns of atrophy also help us understand and predict the clinical course of individuals, such as associated behavioral or motor deficits.
Authors: Andreia V Faria; Alexander Hoon; Elaine Stashinko; Xin Li; Hangyi Jiang; Ameneh Mashayekh; Kazi Akhter; John Hsu; Kenichi Oishi; Jiangyang Zhang; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: William R Riddle; Rui Li; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Susan C DonLevy; Benoit M Dawant; Ronald R Price Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Andreia V Faria; Jiangyang Zhang; Kenichi Oishi; Xin Li; Hangyi Jiang; Kazi Akhter; Laurent Hermoye; Seung-Koo Lee; Alexander Hoon; Elaine Stashinko; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stephen M Wilson; Jennifer M Ogar; Victor Laluz; Matthew Growdon; Jung Jang; Shenly Glenn; Bruce L Miller; Michael W Weiner; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jonathan D Rohrer; Matthew J Clarkson; Raivo Kittus; Martin N Rossor; Sebastien Ourselin; Jason D Warren; Nick C Fox Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Bradley F Boeve; Kevin B Boylan; Neill R Graff-Radford; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; David S Knopman; Otto Pedraza; Prashanthi Vemuri; David Jones; Val Lowe; Melissa E Murray; Dennis W Dickson; Keith A Josephs; Beth K Rush; Mary M Machulda; Julie A Fields; Tanis J Ferman; Matthew Baker; Nicola J Rutherford; Jennifer Adamson; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Anahita Adeli; Rodolfo Savica; Brendon Boot; Karen M Kuntz; Ralitza Gavrilova; Andrew Reeves; Jennifer Whitwell; Kejal Kantarci; Clifford R Jack; Joseph E Parisi; John A Lucas; Ronald C Petersen; Rosa Rademakers Journal: Brain Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jonathan D Rohrer; Francesca Caso; Colin Mahoney; Maya Henry; Howard J Rosen; Gil Rabinovici; Martin N Rossor; Bruce Miller; Jason D Warren; Nick C Fox; Gerard R Ridgway; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini Journal: Brain Lang Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Julius Fridriksson; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Argye E Hillis; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Alexandra Basilakos; Grigori Yourganov; Leonardo Bonilha Journal: Brain Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Bonnie L Breining; Andreia V Faria; Brian Caffo; Erin L Meier; Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian; Donna C Tippett; Argye E Hillis Journal: Aphasiology Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Leonardo Bonilha; Argye E Hillis; Gregory Hickok; Dirk B den Ouden; Chris Rorden; Julius Fridriksson Journal: Brain Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Adam Odolil; Amy E Wright; Lynsey M Keator; Shannon M Sheppard; Bonnie Breining; Donna C Tippett; Argye E Hillis Journal: Aphasiology Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 2.773
Authors: Rajani Sebastian; Carol B Thompson; Nae-Yuh Wang; Amy Wright; Aaron Meyer; Rhonda B Friedman; Argye E Hillis; Donna C Tippett Journal: Aphasiology Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 2.773
Authors: Eduardo Europa; Leonardo Iaccarino; David C Perry; Elizabeth Weis; Ariane E Welch; Gil D Rabinovici; Bruce L Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Maya L Henry Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Siddharth Ramanan; Daniel Roquet; Zoë-Lee Goldberg; John R Hodges; Olivier Piguet; Muireann Irish; Matthew A Lambon Ralph Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2020-10-17