Literature DB >> 25435384

Biomechanical influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution over internal hexagon short implant: 3-D finite element analysis with statistical test.

Fellippo Ramos Verri1, Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior2, Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida2, Guilherme Bérgamo Brandão de Oliveira2, Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista2, Heitor Marques Honório3, Pedro Yoshito Noritomi4, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer2.   

Abstract

The study of short implants is relevant to the biomechanics of dental implants, and research on crown increase has implications for the daily clinic. The aim of this study was to analyze the biomechanical interactions of a singular implant-supported prosthesis of different crown heights under vertical and oblique force, using the 3-D finite element method. Six 3-D models were designed with Invesalius 3.0, Rhinoceros 3D 4.0, and Solidworks 2010 software. Each model was constructed with a mandibular segment of bone block, including an implant supporting a screwed metal-ceramic crown. The crown height was set at 10, 12.5, and 15 mm. The applied force was 200 N (axial) and 100 N (oblique). We performed an ANOVA statistical test and Tukey tests; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The increase of crown height did not influence the stress distribution on screw prosthetic (p>0.05) under axial load. However, crown heights of 12.5 and 15 mm caused statistically significant damage to the stress distribution of screws and to the cortical bone (p<0.001) under oblique load. High crown to implant (C/I) ratio harmed microstrain distribution on bone tissue under axial and oblique loads (p<0.001). Crown increase was a possible deleterious factor to the screws and to the different regions of bone tissue.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis of variance; Biomechanics; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Implant-Supported Prosthesis Dental

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25435384     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

Review 1.  Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan A V Palacios; Jaime Jiménez Garcia; João M M Caramês; Marc Quirynen; Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages.

Authors:  Fellippo Ramos Verri; Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior; Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida; Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri; Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista; Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos; Pedro Yoshito Noritomi; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Comparison of Short and Standard Implants in the Posterior Mandible: A 3D Analysis Using Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Allahyar Geramy; Amirreza Rokn; Abbasali Keshtkar; Abbas Monzavi; Hamid Mahmood Hashemi; Tahereh Bitaraf
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-03

4.  Principles of biomechanics in oral implantology.

Authors:  Avram Manea; Simion Bran; Cristian Dinu; Horatiu Rotaru; Ioan Barbur; Bogdan Crisan; Gabriel Armencea; Florin Onisor; Madalina Lazar; Daniel Ostas; Mihaela Baciut; Sergiu Vacaras; Ileana Mitre; Liana Crisan; Ovidiu Muresan; Rares Roman; Grigore Baciut
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-12-15

5.  Effects of cementless fixation of implant prosthesis: A finite element study.

Authors:  Hyeonjong Lee; Soyeon Park; Kung-Rock Kwon; Gunwoo Noh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Carfilzomib inhibits the proliferation and apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells by inhibiting STAT1/COX-2/iNOS signaling pathway.

Authors:  Shaolong He; Weiwei Tian; Jie Zhao; Rong Gong; Tao Wang; Liangming Ma
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 7.  Simultaneous placement of short implants (≤ 8 mm) versus standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) after sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxillae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Tang; Qianhui Du; Jiaying Luo; Lin Peng
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-05

8.  CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants.

Authors:  Francesco Cavallin; Stefano Sivolella; Silvia Meggiorin; Nadia Ferrarese; Amalia Lupi; Antonino Fiorino; Chiara Giraudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.