Literature DB >> 25434838

Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse.

Cecile A Unger1, Mark D Walters2, Beri Ridgeway2, J Eric Jelovsek2, Matthew D Barber2, Marie Fidela R Paraiso2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe perioperative and postoperative adverse events associated with uterosacral colpopexy, to describe the rate of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) associated with uterosacral colpopexy, and to determine whether surgeon technique and suture choice are associated with these rates. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review of women who underwent uterosacral colpopexy for POP from January 2006 through December 2011 at a single tertiary care center. The electronic medical record was queried for demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Strict definitions were used for all clinically relevant adverse events. Recurrent POP was defined as the following: symptomatic vaginal bulge, prolapse to or beyond the hymen, or any retreatment for POP.
RESULTS: In all, 983 subjects met study inclusion criteria. The overall adverse event rate was 31.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2-38.6), which included 20.3% (95% CI, 17.9-23.6) of subjects with postoperative urinary tract infections. Of all adverse events, 3.4% were attributed to a preexisting medical condition, while all other events were ascribed to the surgical intervention. Vaginal hysterectomy, age, and operative time were not significantly associated with any adverse event. The intraoperative bladder injury rate was 1% (95% CI, 0.6-1.9) and there were no intraoperative ureteral injuries; 4.5% (95% CI, 3.4-6.0) of cases were complicated by ureteral kinking requiring suture removal. The rates of pulmonary and cardiac complications were 2.3% (95% CI, 1.6-3.5) and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4-1.6); and the rates of postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction were 0.1% (95% CI, 0.02-0.6) and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4-1.6). The composite recurrent POP rate was 14.4% (95% CI, 12.4-16.8): 10.6% (95% CI, 8.8-12.7) of patients experienced vaginal bulge symptoms, 11% (95% CI, 9.2-13.1) presented with prolapse to or beyond the hymen, and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.4-4.7) required retreatment. Number and type of suture used were not associated with a higher rate of recurrence. Of the subjects who required unilateral removal of sutures to resolve ureteral kinking, 63.6% did not undergo suture replacement; this was not associated with a higher rate of POP recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Perioperative and postoperative complication rates associated with severe morbidity after uterosacral colpopexy appear to be low. Uterosacral colpopexy remains a safe option for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apical prolapse; uterosacral colpopexy; uterosacral ligament suspension; uterovaginal prolapse; vaginal vault suspension

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25434838     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

1.  Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.

Authors:  Sara Houlihan; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Colin Birch; Selphee Tang; Erin A Brennand
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks.

Authors:  Pedro A Maldonado; Mallory A Stuparich; Donald D McIntire; Clifford Y Wai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Follow-up postoperative calls to reduce common postoperative complaints among urogynecology patients.

Authors:  Christopher Iwanoff; Maria Giannopoulos; Charbel Salamon
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.

Authors:  Megan S Bradley; Jennifer A Bickhaus; Cindy L Amundsen; Laura K Newcomb; Tracy Truong; Alison C Weidner; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.

Authors:  Mallika Anand; Amy L Weaver; Kristin M Fruth; Emanuel C Trabuco; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Perioperative adverse events in women undergoing concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgeries for suspected malignancy.

Authors:  Emily R W Davidson; Katherine Woodburn; Mariam AlHilli; Cecile A Ferrando
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse.

Authors:  Pamela S Fairchild; Neil S Kamdar; Mitchell B Berger; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Postoperative appointments: which ones count?

Authors:  Margaret G Mueller; Dana Elborno; Bhumy A Davé; Alix Leader-Cramer; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.