Peter O'Meara1, Graham Munro2, Brett Williams3, Simon Cooper4, Fiona Bogossian5, Linda Ross3, Louise Sparkes4, Mark Browning4, Mariah McClounan3. 1. La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: p.omeara@latrobe.edu.au. 2. La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Australia. 4. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Berwick, Australia. 5. School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this quasi-experimental before-and-after study were to first determine whether the use of eye tracking technology combined with video debriefing techniques has the potential to improve the quality of feedback and enhance situation awareness (SA) in simulated settings and second to determine students' satisfaction towards simulated learning. METHODS: Nursing and paramedicine students from three universities participated in three 8-minute simulation scenarios of acutely deteriorating patients. Eye tracking glasses video recorded the scenarios and tracked right eye movement. On completion, participants were questioned using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique, completed the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES), and provided textual feedback and received video-based verbal feedback. RESULTS: Participants lacked awareness of presenting medical conditions and patient environments and had poor recall of patient vital signs. Significant improvements in SA scores were demonstrated between the first and third scenarios (P = 0.04). Participants reported greater insight into their performance and were satisfied with simulated learning. CONCLUSIONS: Use of visual field review techniques appears to enhance the use of realistic simulated practice as a means of addressing significant performance deficits. Eye tracking and point of view recording techniques are feasible and with applicable debriefing techniques could enhance clinical and situated performance.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this quasi-experimental before-and-after study were to first determine whether the use of eye tracking technology combined with video debriefing techniques has the potential to improve the quality of feedback and enhance situation awareness (SA) in simulated settings and second to determine students' satisfaction towards simulated learning. METHODS: Nursing and paramedicine students from three universities participated in three 8-minute simulation scenarios of acutely deteriorating patients. Eye tracking glasses video recorded the scenarios and tracked right eye movement. On completion, participants were questioned using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique, completed the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES), and provided textual feedback and received video-based verbal feedback. RESULTS:Participants lacked awareness of presenting medical conditions and patient environments and had poor recall of patient vital signs. Significant improvements in SA scores were demonstrated between the first and third scenarios (P = 0.04). Participants reported greater insight into their performance and were satisfied with simulated learning. CONCLUSIONS: Use of visual field review techniques appears to enhance the use of realistic simulated practice as a means of addressing significant performance deficits. Eye tracking and point of view recording techniques are feasible and with applicable debriefing techniques could enhance clinical and situated performance.
Authors: Thomas J Caruso; Olivia Hess; Kenny Roy; Ellen Wang; Samuel Rodriguez; Coby Palivathukal; Nick Haber Journal: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn Date: 2021-02-24
Authors: Jonathan Currie; Raymond R Bond; Paul McCullagh; Pauline Black; Dewar D Finlay; Stephen Gallagher; Peter Kearney; Aaron Peace; Danail Stoyanov; Colin D Bicknell; Stephen Leslie; Anthony G Gallagher Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: M D Grima-Murcia; Francisco Sanchez-Ferrer; Jose Manuel Ramos-Rincón; Eduardo Fernández Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 5.428