Literature DB >> 25434079

Noise exposure during pregnancy, birth outcomes and fetal development: meta-analyses using quality effects model.

Angel M Dzhambov1, Donka D Dimitrova2, Elena D Dimitrakova3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many women are exposed daily to high levels of occupational and residential noise, so the effect of noise exposure on pregnancy should be considered because noise affects both the fetus and the mother herself. However, there is a controversy in the literature regarding the adverse effects of occupational and residential noise on pregnant women and their fetuses. AIM: The aim of this study was to conduct systematic review of previously analyzed studies, to add additional information omitted in previous reviews and to perform meta-analyses on the effects of noise exposure on pregnancy, birth outcomes and fetal development.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Previous reviews and meta-analyses on the topic were consulted. Additionally, a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Internet was carried out. Twenty nine studies were included in the meta-analyses. Quality effects meta-analytical model was applied.
RESULTS: Women exposed to high noise levels (in most of the studies ≥ 80 dB) during pregnancy are at a significantly higher risk for having small-for-gestational-age newborn (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.38), gestational hypertension (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.58) and infant with congenital malformations (RR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.79). The effect was not significant for preeclampsia, perinatal death, spontaneous abortion and preterm birth.
CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with previous findings regarding a higher risk for small-for-gestational-age. They also highlight the significance of residential and occupational noise exposure for developing gestational hypertension and especially congenital malformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25434079     DOI: 10.2478/folmed-2014-0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Med (Plovdiv)        ISSN: 0204-8043


  8 in total

Review 1.  Developmental Programming in Animal Models: Critical Evidence of Current Environmental Negative Changes.

Authors:  Victoria Ramírez; Regina J Bautista; Oswaldo Frausto-González; Nelly Rodríguez-Peña; Eduardo Tena Betancourt; Claudia J Bautista
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Adverse Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Gordana Ristovska; Payam Dadvand
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A Longitudinal Study of Road Traffic Noise and Body Mass Index Trajectories from Birth to 8 Years.

Authors:  Kjell Vegard Weyde; Norun Hjertager Krog; Bente Oftedal; Per Magnus; Richard White; Stephen Stansfeld; Simon Øverland; Gunn Marit Aasvang
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Birth Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Angel M Dzhambov; Peter Lercher
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Predicting the Risk of Microtia From Prenatal Factors: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Manqing Sun; Yue Zhang; Qun Zhang; Xiaolin Xu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Factors associated with fetal karyotype in spontaneous abortion: a case-case study.

Authors:  Qinghua Xu; Ying Chan; Yun Feng; Baosheng Zhu; Bicheng Yang; Shu Zhu; Lingyun Su; Li Zou; Na Feng; Yan Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 7.  Developmental onset of cardiovascular disease-Could the proof be in the placenta?

Authors:  Jeanine N D'Errico; Phoebe A Stapleton
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Fetal growth outcomes following peri-implantation exposure of Long-Evans rats to noise and ozone differ by sex.

Authors:  Colette N Miller; Urmila P Kodavanti; Erica J Stewart; Mette C Schladweiler; Judy H Richards; Samantha J Snow; Andres R Henriquez; Wendy M Oshiro; Aimen K Farraj; Mehdi S Hazari; Janice A Dye
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.027

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.