| Literature DB >> 25433403 |
Jeonghyun Chang1, Jeong Su Park1, Sookja Park1, Byeonghoo Choi1, Nam Seop Yoon1, Heungsup Sung1, Mi-Na Kim2.
Abstract
The BACTEC™ FX (BD, USA) has been recently upgraded to measure virtual blood volume (VV) in batches of 25 PLUS Aerobic/F bottles. VVs were compared with manually measured actual volumes (AVs). The mean AV was larger in anaerobic bottles: 2.6±1.9mL in 2995 Aerobic/F bottles and 3.3±1.8mL in 3053 Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F bottles (P<0.001). The VV of Aerobic/F bottles was 2.4±1.4mL, and there was a significant correlation between the VVs and AVs of each department (P<0.001). The potential positivity in aerobic bottles increased 1.2-fold with a 1-mL increase in the AV (P<0.001). AV and VV were consistently less than adequate. Although the proportional effect of volume on positivity can be proven only with the AV, VVs are a reliable substitute for AVs to monitor the overall blood volumes and provide feedback to the individual departments or locations.Keywords: Aerobic bottle; Anaerobic bottle; Blood culture; Blood volume; Monitoring
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25433403 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803