Literature DB >> 25433274

Investigation of resins suitable for the preparation of biological sample for 3-D electron microscopy.

Caroline Kizilyaprak1, Giovanni Longo2, Jean Daraspe3, Bruno M Humbel4.   

Abstract

In the last two decades, the third-dimension has become a focus of attention in electron microscopy to better understand the interactions within subcellular compartments. Initially, transmission electron tomography (TEM tomography) was introduced to image the cell volume in semi-thin sections (∼ 500 nm). With the introduction of the focused ion beam scanning electron microscope, a new tool, FIB-SEM tomography, became available to image much larger volumes. During TEM tomography and FIB-SEM tomography, the resin section is exposed to a high electron/ion dose such that the stability of the resin embedded biological sample becomes an important issue. The shrinkage of a resin section in each dimension, especially in depth, is a well-known phenomenon. To ensure the dimensional integrity of the final volume of the cell, it is important to assess the properties of the different resins and determine the formulation which has the best stability in the electron/ion beam. Here, eight different resin formulations were examined. The effects of radiation damage were evaluated after different times of TEM irradiation. To get additional information on mass-loss and the physical properties of the resins (stiffness and adhesion), the topography of the irradiated areas was analysed with atomic force microscopy (AFM). Further, the behaviour of the resins was analysed after ion milling of the surface of the sample with different ion currents. In conclusion, two resin formulations, Hard Plus and the mixture of Durcupan/Epon, emerged that were considerably less affected and reasonably stable in the electron/ion beam and thus suitable for the 3-D investigation of biological samples.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Atomic force microscopy (AFM); Durcupan; Epon; Epoxy; Focused ion beam (FIB); Lowicryl; Methacrylate; Radiation damage; Scanning electron microscope (SEM); Shrinkage of resin section; Tomography; Transmission electron microscope (TEM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25433274     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of 3D cellular imaging techniques based on scanned electron probes: Serial block face SEM vs. Axial bright-field STEM tomography.

Authors:  E L McBride; A Rao; G Zhang; J D Hoyne; G N Calco; B C Kuo; Q He; A A Prince; I D Pokrovskaya; B Storrie; A A Sousa; M A Aronova; R D Leapman
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 2.  Focused ion beams in biology.

Authors:  Kedar Narayan; Sriram Subramaniam
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Three-dimensional ultrastructure of osteocytes assessed by focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM).

Authors:  Tomoka Hasegawa; Tomomaya Yamamoto; Hiromi Hongo; Zixuan Qiu; Miki Abe; Takuma Kanesaki; Kawori Tanaka; Takashi Endo; Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas; Minqi Li; Norio Amizuka
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.304

4.  Analysis of three-dimensional chromatin packing domains by chromatin scanning transmission electron microscopy (ChromSTEM).

Authors:  Yue Li; Vasundhara Agrawal; Ranya K A Virk; Eric Roth; Wing Shun Li; Adam Eshein; Jane Frederick; Kai Huang; Luay Almassalha; Reiner Bleher; Marcelo A Carignano; Igal Szleifer; Vinayak P Dravid; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBF-SEM) of Biological Tissue Samples.

Authors:  Justin A Courson; Paul T Landry; Thao Do; Eric Spehlmann; Pascal J Lafontant; Nimesh Patel; Rolando E Rumbaut; Alan R Burns
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Quantitative method for estimating stain density in electron microscopy of conventionally prepared biological specimens.

Authors:  A Fera; Q He; G Zhang; R D Leapman
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.952

7.  Cryo-fluorescence microscopy of high-pressure frozen C. elegans enables correlative FIB-SEM imaging of targeted embryonic stages in the intact worm.

Authors:  Irene Y Chang; Mohammad Rahman; Adam Harned; Orna Cohen-Fix; Kedar Narayan
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 1.829

8.  FIB-SEM tomography of human skin telocytes and their extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Dragos Cretoiu; Mihaela Gherghiceanu; Eric Hummel; Hans Zimmermann; Olga Simionescu; Laurentiu M Popescu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 9.  Viral Infection at High Magnification: 3D Electron Microscopy Methods to Analyze the Architecture of Infected Cells.

Authors:  Inés Romero-Brey; Ralf Bartenschlager
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Conductive resins improve charging and resolution of acquired images in electron microscopic volume imaging.

Authors:  Huy Bang Nguyen; Truc Quynh Thai; Sei Saitoh; Bao Wu; Yurika Saitoh; Satoshi Shimo; Hiroshi Fujitani; Hirohide Otobe; Nobuhiko Ohno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.