Literature DB >> 25432987

Suitability of antral follicle counts and computer-assisted analysis of ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images for estimating follicular reserve in porcine, ovine and bovine ovaries ex situ.

Lisa Warren1, Maciej Murawski2, Karolina Wilk2, Dorota A Zieba2, Pawel M Bartlewski3.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine if correlations exist between the numbers of microscopic follicles comprising ovarian follicular reserve (OFR) and antral follicle counts (AFCs), and to assess the usefulness of computerized analyses of ovarian ultrasonograms and magnetic resonance (MR) images for estimating OFR in excised porcine, ovine and bovine ovaries. As a pre-requisite to these analyses, we characterized and compared ovarian cortical histomorphology and follicle populations in the three species varying in prolificacy and overall reproductive longevity, and hence the total number of microscopic and antral follicles. Ultrasonographic and MR images were obtained at the scanner settings optimized to provide opposing contrasts between antral follicles and the ovarian stroma. Commercially available ImageProPlus® analytical software was used to calculate numerical pixel values (NPVs) and pixel heterogeneity (standard deviation of the pixel values) along the computer-generated lines (4-6) placed in the area corresponding to the ovarian cortex. The numbers of primordial (r = 0.38, P < 0.01) and intermediate follicles (r = 0.37, P < 0.01) were correlated with the numbers of antral follicles in bovine ovarian sections. The numbers of primordial (r = 0.28, P < 0.05), intermediate (r = 0.31, P < 0.01) and primary follicles (r = 0.27, P < 0.05) correlated directly with mean NPVs of the ultrasonographic ovarian images in cattle. There was a negative correlation between primary follicle numbers and NPVs of MR images (3D FAST-SPOILED GRADIENT ECHO) of the porcine ovarian cortex (r = -0.31, P < 0.05). To summarize, the numbers of primordial and intermediate follicles could only be estimated from AFCs in cows. Using ultrasound NPVs, the numbers of primordial, intermediate and primary follicles could be directly estimated in bovine ovaries and the quantitative image attributes of MR images were useful for quantifying porcine primary follicles. The bovine ovarian model is compatible with human situation and hence future studies should be undertaken to ascertain the usefulness of AFCs and ultrasonographic image analyses for estimating OFR in women.
© 2014 by the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ovarian follicle reserve; digital image analysis; magnetic resonance imaging; ovarian histology; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432987      PMCID: PMC4935271          DOI: 10.1177/1535370214560971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)        ISSN: 1535-3699


  27 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance image attributes of the ovarian follicle wall during development and regression.

Authors:  J L Hilton; G E Sarty; G P Adams; R A Pierson
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Comparative study of the dynamics of follicular waves in mares and women.

Authors:  O J Ginther; E L Gastal; M O Gastal; D R Bergfelt; A R Baerwald; R A Pierson
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Methods for quantifying follicular numbers within the mouse ovary.

Authors:  M Myers; K L Britt; N G M Wreford; F J P Ebling; J B Kerr
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Advanced methods of isolation and identification of porcine primordial follicles.

Authors:  Kerong Shi; Xuefeng Yuan; Liying Du; Dengke Pan; Yunhai Zhang; Yonghui Zhao; Xuemei Deng; Xiaoxiang Hu; Changxin Wu; Ning Li
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2006-11-26       Impact factor: 2.145

5.  In vitro growth of oocytes from primordial follicles isolated from frozen-thawed lamb ovaries.

Authors:  Wanzirai Muruvi; H M Picton; R G Rodway; I M Joyce
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Early follicular antimüllerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Cem Fiçicioglu; Tayfun Kutlu; Elif Baglam; Zeynep Bakacak
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Ovarian biopsy has no role as a routine diagnostic test of ovarian reserve: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ricky Kwok; Neil P Johnson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  The clomiphene citrate challenge test versus the exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test as a single test for identification of low responders and hyperresponders to in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Janet Kwee; Roel Schats; Joseph McDonnell; Joop Schoemaker; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Developmental pattern of small antral follicles in the bovine ovary.

Authors:  R S Jaiswal; J Singh; G P Adams
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  Ovarian reserve tests.

Authors:  Padma Rekah Jirge
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Serum Concentrations of AMH and E2 and Ovarian and Uterine Traits in Gilts.

Authors:  Alicia Steel; Rebecca Z Athorn; Christopher G Grupen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Ginsenoside Rg1 improves pathological damages by activating the&nbsp;p21‑p53‑STK pathway in ovary and Bax‑Bcl2 in the uterus in premature ovarian insufficiency mouse models.

Authors:  Lianli He; Xiaojuan Wang; Daigang Cheng; Zhengai Xiong; Xiaoyun Liu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.952

3.  Optimal Dietary Fiber Intake to Retain a Greater Ovarian Follicle Reserve for Gilts.

Authors:  Meng Cao; Yong Zhuo; Lechan Gong; Lianchao Tang; Zipeng Li; Yang Li; Min Yang; Shengyu Xu; Jian Li; Lianqiang Che; Yan Lin; Bin Feng; Zhengfeng Fang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.