Literature DB >> 25432920

No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT.

H Park1, C Bergh1, U Selleskog1, A Thurin-Kjellberg1, K Lundin2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does culture in a closed system result in an increased number of good quality embryos (GQE) on Day 2 compared with culture in a conventional system? SUMMARY ANSWER: Culture in a closed system up to 2 days after microinjection results in similar embryo development and morphological quality compared with culture in a conventional incubation system. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Time-lapse imaging (TLI) incubators are rapidly being introduced into IVF laboratories worldwide, despite the lack of large prospective randomized trials demonstrating improvement in embryo development or pregnancy rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A randomized controlled trial including 364 patients (365 cycles) was conducted between May 2010 and February 2014. After oocyte collection, randomization was carried out and all of a patients' oocytes were allocated to culture in either a conventional incubator or a closed incubator system in proportion 1:2 until embryo transfer on Day 2. A total of 1979 oocytes were injected and cultured in the closed system, and 1000 in the standard incubator. The primary end-point was the number of GQE in the two groups. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS,
METHODS: In total, 364 patients undergoing their first IVF cycle using ICSI, where at least one oocyte was retrieved, were randomized in a university hospital setting. Two hundred and forty patients were randomized for culture in a closed system and 124 patients for culture in the conventional incubator system (control group). Embryo assessments and final morphological scoring before transfer and cryopreservation were carried out at the same time points for embryos cultured in the conventional incubator and in the closed system. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no significant difference in the mean ± SD number of GQEs between groups: 2.41 ± 2.27 for the closed system group and 2.19 ± 1.82 for the control group (P = 0.34, difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.69; -0.24). No significant differences were found in the number of 4-cell embryos, implantation-, pregnancy- or ongoing pregnancy rates. A significantly higher miscarriage rate was found in the TLI group compared with the control group (33.3 and 10.2%, P = 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Culture media, temperature and gas levels were similar in the open and closed incubator systems, but different culture dishes were used. Culturing embryos for longer time period (to the blastocyst stage) may give different results. Only ICSI patients were included, which may limit the generalizability of the results. Finally, the number of GQEs on Day 2 was used as a surrogate outcome for live birth. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The results are consistent with other, smaller randomized trials showing no difference in embryo quality when comparing culture in a conventional incubator with that of a closed TLI incubator system.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproduction; embryo culture; safety; time-lapse

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432920     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Peter Kovacs; Wellington P Martins
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

3.  Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis.

Authors:  Liron Bar-El; Yael Kalma; Mira Malcov; Tamar Schwartz; Shaul Raviv; Tania Cohen; Hadar Amir; Yoni Cohen; Adi Reches; Ami Amit; Dalit Ben-Yosef
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-25

6.  First successful pregnancies following embryo selection using Time-lapse technology in Iran: Case report.

Authors:  Azita Faramarzi; Mohammad Ali Khalili; Mehrdad Soleimani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-04

7.  Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Yan-Guang Wu; Emanuela Lazzaroni-Tealdi; Qi Wang; Lin Zhang; David H Barad; Vitaly A Kushnir; Sarah K Darmon; David F Albertini; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Minghao Chen; Shiyou Wei; Junyan Hu; Jing Yuan; Fenghua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.