Literature DB >> 25432556

Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice.

Manu L N G Malbrain1, Paul E Marik, Ine Witters, Colin Cordemans, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Derek J Roberts, Niels Van Regenmortel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is associated with generalised endothelial injury and capillary leak and has traditionally been treated with large volume fluid resuscitation. Some patients with sepsis will accumulate bodily fluids. The aim of this study was to systematically review the association between a positive fluid balance/fluid overload and outcomes in critically ill adults, and to determine whether interventions aimed at reducing fluid balance may be linked with improved outcomes.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Database, clinical trials registries, and bibliographies of included articles. Two authors independently reviewed citations and selected studies examining the association between fluid balance and outcomes or where the intervention was any strategy or protocol that attempted to obtain a negative or neutral cumulative fluid balance after the third day of intensive care compared to usual care. The primary outcomes of interest were the incidence of IAH and mortality.
RESULTS: Among all identified citations, one individual patient meta-analysis, 11 randomised controlled clinical trials, seven interventional studies, 24 observational studies, and four case series met the inclusion criteria. Altogether, 19,902 critically ill patients were studied. The cumulative fluid balance after one week of ICU stay was 4.4 L more positive in non-survivors compared to survivors. A restrictive fluid management strategy resulted in a less positive cumulative fluid balance of 5.6 L compared to controls after one week of ICU stay. A restrictive fluid management was associated with a lower mortality compared to patients treated with a more liberal fluid management strategy (24.7% vs 33.2%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI 0.32-0.55; P < 0.0001). Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) had a more positive cumulative fluid balance of 3.4 L after one week of ICU stay. Interventions to decrease fluid balance resulted in a decrease in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): an average total body fluid removal of 4.9 L resulted in a drop in IAP from 19.3 ± 9.1 mm Hg to 11.5 ± 3.9 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: A positive cumulative fluid balance is associated with IAH and worse outcomes. Interventions to limit the development of a positive cumulative fluid balance are associated with improved outcomes. In patients not transgressing spontaneously from the Ebb to Flow phases of shock, late conservative fluid management and late goal directed fluid removal (de-resuscitation) should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432556     DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther        ISSN: 1642-5758


  106 in total

1.  Understanding abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  J J De Waele; I De Laet; M L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Selective histone deacetylase 6 inhibition prolongs survival in a lethal two-hit model.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Zhengcai Liu; Baoling Liu; Ting Zhao; Yongqing Li; Hasan B Alam
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Scoring systems for the characterization of sepsis and associated outcomes.

Authors:  Natalie McLymont; Guy W Glover
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

4.  Effects of the Kv7 voltage-activated potassium channel inhibitor linopirdine in rat models of haemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Sean P Nassoiy; Favin S Babu; Heather M LaPorte; Kenneth L Byron; Matthias Majetschak
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.557

5.  Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jonathan A Silversides; Anders Perner; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Association of perioperative weight-based fluid balance with 30-day mortality and acute kidney injury among patients in the surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Tak Kyu Oh; In-Ae Song; Sang-Hwan Do; Sanghoon Jheon; Cheong Lim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Fixed minimum volume resuscitation: Pro.

Authors:  Flavia R Machado; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Liberal Versus Restrictive Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Early Septic Shock: Rationale for a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Matthew W Semler; Rinaldo Bellomo; Samuel M Brown; Bennett P deBoisblanc; Matthew C Exline; Adit A Ginde; Colin K Grissom; David R Janz; Alan E Jones; Kathleen D Liu; Stephen P J Macdonald; Chadwick D Miller; Pauline K Park; Lora A Reineck; Todd W Rice; Jay S Steingrub; Daniel Talmor; Donald M Yealy; Ivor S Douglas; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Efficacy of furosemide-albumin compared with furosemide in critically ill hypoalbuminemia patients admitted to intensive care unit: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ata Mahmoodpoor; Sahra Zahedi; Arezou Pourakbar; Hamed Hamishehkar; Kamran Shadvar; Parina Asgharian; Farnaz Shahabi; Hadi Hamishehkar
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Pulmonary Arterial Compliance in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Clinical Determinants and Association With Outcome From the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial Cohort.

Authors:  Thomas S Metkus; Emmanouil Tampakakis; Christopher J Mullin; Brian A Houston; Todd M Kolb; Stephen C Mathai; Rachel Damico; Bradley A Maron; Paul M Hassoun; Roy G Brower; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.