PURPOSE: Lasers have been extensively used in dentistry for several applications. We investigated and compared the use of an erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and conventional rotary instruments for bone removal in third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. Patients with bilateral and symmetrical third molar impaction referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, were enrolled in the study. Each patient was treated once with the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and once with conventional rotary instruments for bone removal during third molar surgery. Pain, swelling, and trismus were taken into account to match the 2 techniques.In addition, the times required to complete osteotomy and for the full operation were recorded. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed, and the P value was set at .05. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 15 patients (8 men and 7 women) ranging in age from 18 to 30 years. Pain perceived in the laser-treated group was significantly less than that in the conventional group(P = .0013). This also was true for trismus (P = .0002) and swelling. The operating time for osteotomy was longer in the laser group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the laser could be an interesting alternative to conventional rotary instruments. Future studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm the conclusions achieved from this work.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Lasers have been extensively used in dentistry for several applications. We investigated and compared the use of an erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and conventional rotary instruments for bone removal in third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. Patients with bilateral and symmetrical third molar impaction referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, were enrolled in the study. Each patient was treated once with the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and once with conventional rotary instruments for bone removal during third molar surgery. Pain, swelling, and trismus were taken into account to match the 2 techniques.In addition, the times required to complete osteotomy and for the full operation were recorded. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed, and the P value was set at .05. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 15 patients (8 men and 7 women) ranging in age from 18 to 30 years. Pain perceived in the laser-treated group was significantly less than that in the conventional group(P = .0013). This also was true for trismus (P = .0002) and swelling. The operating time for osteotomy was longer in the laser group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the laser could be an interesting alternative to conventional rotary instruments. Future studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm the conclusions achieved from this work.