Literature DB >> 25432412

Response.

Margaret Sullivan Pepe1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25432412      PMCID： PMC4334835          DOI： 10.1093/jnci/dju356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN： 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  A note on the evaluation of novel biomarkers: do not rely on integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index.

Authors:  Jørgen Hilden; Thomas A Gerds
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Does the net reclassification improvement help us evaluate models and markers?

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Margaret Pepe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  The Net Reclassification Index (NRI): a Misleading Measure of Prediction Improvement Even with Independent Test Data Sets.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Jing Fan; Ziding Feng; Thomas Gerds; Jorgen Hilden
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2014-08-23

Review 6.  Net reclassification indices for evaluating risk prediction instruments: a critical review.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Zheyu Wang; Holly Janes; Robyn L McClelland; Bruce M Psaty; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.