Literature DB >> 25432355

Monitoring of osteoporosis therapy.

Olivier Bruyère1, Jean-Yves Reginster2.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, major advances have been made in the number and range of agents available for the treatment of osteoporosis, all with proven anti-fracture efficacy. Unfortunately, compliance with these treatments is not optimal, and a number of patients could be considered as non-responders. Consequently, monitoring anti-osteoporotic therapy could be part of successful osteoporosis management. Currently, no formal well-accepted clinical practice guidelines are available for monitoring anti-osteoporosis therapies. Changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers, while on therapy, have potential value in monitoring treatment but their assessment and, consequently, their benefits could be limited by metrological and clinical issues. Moreover, their effectiveness is probably drug dependant. Recommendation for the standardisation of the methodology when analysing the potential relevance of tools for the monitoring of osteoporosis therapy is needed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; bone turnover markers; monitoring; osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432355     DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2014.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 1521-690X            Impact factor:   4.690


  6 in total

1.  Bone mineral density averaged over a region of interest on femur is affected by age-related change of bone geometry.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effectiveness of resistance training or jumping-exercise to increase bone mineral density in men with low bone mass: A 12-month randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  Pamela S Hinton; Peggy Nigh; John Thyfault
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  W D Leslie; P Martineau; M Bryanton; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The role of biochemical of bone turnover markers in osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease: a consensus paper of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  E Cavalier; P Bergmann; O Bruyère; P Delanaye; A Durnez; J-P Devogelaer; S L Ferrari; E Gielen; S Goemaere; J-M Kaufman; A Nzeusseu Toukap; J-Y Reginster; A-F Rousseau; S Rozenberg; A J Scheen; J-J Body
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Current Status of the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Agustín Aibar-Almazán; Ana Voltes-Martínez; Yolanda Castellote-Caballero; Diego Fernando Afanador-Restrepo; María Del Carmen Carcelén-Fraile; Elena López-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Effect of Strength Training Protocol on Bone Mineral Density for Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia/Osteoporosis Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors:  Iulian Ștefan Holubiac; Florin Valentin Leuciuc; Daniela Maria Crăciun; Tatiana Dobrescu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.