Literature DB >> 25431998

Financial implications of the continuity of primary care.

Marcus J Hollander1, Helena Kadlec2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the financial implications of the continuity of care, for patients with high care needs, by examining the cost of government-funded health care services in British Columbia, Canada.
METHODS: Using British Columbia Ministry of Health administrative databases for fiscal year 2010-2011 and generalized linear models, we estimated cost ratios for 10 cost-related predictor variables, including patients' attachment to the practice. Patients were selected and divided into groups on the basis of their Resource Utilization Band (RUB) and placement in provincial registries for 8 chronic conditions (1,619,941 patients). The final dataset included all high- and very-high-care-needs patients in British Columbia (ie, RUB categories 4 and 5) in 1 or more of the 8 registries who met the screening criteria (222,779 patients).
RESULTS: Of the 10 predictors, across 8 medical conditions and both RUBs, patients' attachment to the practice had the strongest relationship to costs (correlations = -0.168 to -0.322). Higher attachment was associated with lower costs. Extrapolation of the findings indicated that an increase of 5% in the overall attachment level, for the selected high-care-needs patients, could have resulted in an estimated cost avoidance of $142 million Canadian for fiscal year 2010-2011.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of care, defined as a patient's attachment to his/her primary care practice, can reduce health care costs over time and across chronic conditions. Health care policy makers may wish to consider creating opportunities for primary care physicians to increase the attachment that their high-care-needs patients have to their practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25431998      PMCID: PMC4315369          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/14-107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  12 in total

Review 1.  Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Robert J Reid; George K Freeman; Barbara H Starfield; Carol E Adair; Rachael McKendry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-22

Review 2.  Describing, explaining or predicting mental health care costs: a guide to regression models. Methodological review.

Authors:  Graham Dunn; Massimo Mirandola; Francesco Amaddeo; Michele Tansella
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 3.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield; Leiyu Shi; James Macinko
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Does continuity of care with a family physician reduce hospitalizations among older adults?

Authors:  Verena H Menec; Monica Sirski; Dhiwya Attawar; Alan Katz
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2006-10

5.  The economic impact of a disability prevention program.

Authors:  Bryan Dowd; Michael McGrail; William H Lohman; Brent Sheasby; Heidi O'Connor; Marilou Calasanz; Robert Gorman; Stephen Parente
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  RISQy business (Relationships, Incentives, Supports, and Quality): evolution of the British Columbia Model of Primary Care (patient-centered medical home).

Authors:  Dan MacCarthy; Marcus J Hollander
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

7.  Continuity of care: is it cost effective?

Authors:  M Raddish; S D Horn; P D Sharkey
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Increasing value for money in the Canadian healthcare system: new findings on the contribution of primary care services.

Authors:  Marcus J Hollander; Helena Kadlec; Ramsay Hamdi; Angela Tessaro
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2009

9.  Continuity of primary care and emergency department utilization among elderly people.

Authors:  Raluca Ionescu-Ittu; Jane McCusker; Antonio Ciampi; Alain-Michel Vadeboncoeur; Danièle Roberge; Danielle Larouche; Josée Verdon; Raynald Pineault
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Ambulatory specialist use by nonhospitalized patients in us health plans: correlates and consequences.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield; Hsien-Yen Chang; Klaus W Lemke; Jonathan P Weiner
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep
View more
  8 in total

1.  Incentive funding in BC is a key factor for physicians to remain in family practice.

Authors:  Shelley Ross
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Effects of the Full Service Family Practice Incentive Program.

Authors:  Marcus J Hollander
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Association between continuity and access in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa L Cook; Richard P Golonka; Charles M Cook; Robin L Walker; Peter Faris; Shannon Spenceley; Richard Lewanczuk; Robert Wedel; Rebecca Love; Cheryl Andres; Susan D Byers; Tim Collins; Scott Oddie
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-11-16

4.  Incentive-Based Primary Care: Cost and Utilization Analysis.

Authors:  Marcus J Hollander; Helena Kadlec
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-08-05

5.  Using standardized patient encounters to teach longitudinal continuity of care in a family medicine clerkship.

Authors:  Bonnie M Vest; Abigail Lynch; Denise McGuigan; Timothy Servoss; Karen Zinnerstrom; Andrew B Symons
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Continuity of Care Evaluation: The View of Patients and Professionals about Urban Family Physician Program.

Authors:  Vahid Kohpeima Jahromi; Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani; Reza Dehnavieh; Hosein Saberi Anari
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-20

7.  Evaluation of the McMaster Family Health Team: results and practical implications for quality improvement.

Authors:  Laila Nasser; Alix Stosic; David Price
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-11-26

8.  How does general practitioner discontinuity affect healthcare utilisation? An observational cohort study of 2.4 million Norwegians 2007-2017.

Authors:  Lena Janita Skarshaug; Silje Lill Kaspersen; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard; Kristine Pape
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.