| Literature DB >> 25431669 |
Anjna Bhatewara1, Srinivasa Rao Jetti1, Tanuja Kadre1, Pradeep Paliwal1, Shubha Jain1.
Abstract
A simple protocol for the efficient preparation ofEntities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 25431669 PMCID: PMC4238236 DOI: 10.1155/2013/197612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Chem ISSN: 2090-2077
Antimicrobial evaluation of synthesized compounds.
| Compound | Norfloxacin |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram +ve bacteria | ||||||
|
| 20 | 18 | 10 | 16 | 15 | 18 |
|
| 22 | 17 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| Gram −ve bacteria | ||||||
|
| 22 | 24 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 15 |
|
| 23 | 20 | 13 | 20 | 18 | 17 |
|
| ||||||
| Compound | Clotrimazole |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Test fungi | ||||||
|
| 20 | 21 | 16 | 18 | 17 | 17 |
|
| 22 | 20 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 15 |
|
| 21 | 19 | 16 | 20 | 16 | 16 |
Scheme 1Piperidine catalyzed synthesis of 2-amino dihydropyrimidinones.
|
|
aAll compounds thus obtained were characterized by physical and spectral data. bIsolated yields.
Effects of compounds (4d, 4e, 4f, 4g, and 4h) and indomethacin in the inhibition of carrageenan-induced rat paw edema.
| Entry | Drug | Dose | Paw volume response at different time intervals in mean ± SEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 hour | 2 hour | 3 hour | 4 hour | |||
| 1 | Control | 10 mL/kg | 0.5912 ± 0.005∗∗∗ | 0.5930 ± 0.002∗∗∗ | 0.6102 ± 0.002∗∗∗ | 0.6303 ± 0.002∗∗∗ |
| 2 | Indomethacin (standard) | 100 mg/kg | 0.2700 ± 0.005∗∗ | 0.3124 ± 0.005∗∗ | 0.3133 ± 0.008∗∗ | 0.3500 ± 0.005∗∗ |
| 3 |
| 20 mg/kg | 0.4000 ± 0.005∗∗∗ | 0.4300 ± 0.005∗∗ | 0.4500 ± 0.011∗∗∗ | 0.4711 ± 0.011∗∗∗ |
| 4 |
| 40 mg/kg | 0.3533 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.3833 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.3967 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.4200 ± 0.010∗∗ |
| 5 |
| 20 mg/kg | 0.4133 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.4433 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.4667 ± 0.008∗∗∗ | 0.4933 ± 0.012∗∗∗ |
| 6 |
| 40 mg/kg | 0.3567 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.3867 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.4133 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.4520 ± 0.005∗∗∗ |
| 7 |
| 20 mg/kg | 0.3833 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.4133 ± 0.003∗∗∗ | 0.4433 ± 0.003∗∗ | 0.4667 ± 0.008∗∗∗ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 6 in each group, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, compared to control. Data was analysed by one way ANOVA followed by Duneet's test. Formula % inhibition = V − V /V × 100 (V-volume, C-control, t-test).