AIMS: Limited data exist on the risk of developing cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and/or adverse events in sarcoidosis patients. Using LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), an emerging sensitive parameter of LV function, we evaluated the prevalence of subclinical cardiac dysfunction in sarcoidosis and investigated whether LVGLS predicts adverse outcomes in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 130 patients with proven sarcoidosis undergoing echocardiography at our referral centre were identified. Following exclusion of those with evidence of CS (n = 14) or other pre-existing structural heart disease (n = 16), 100 patients (55 ± 13 years, 48% male, 90% pulmonary involvement) and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were included. LVGLS was measured by speckle-tracking analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, device implantation, new arrhythmias, or future development of CS on advanced cardiac imaging modalities. LVGLS was significantly impaired in sarcoidosis patients compared with controls (-17.3 ± 2.5 vs. -20.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001). Overall, 27 patients (27%) reached the endpoint during a median follow-up of 35 months. On Cox proportional hazards model analysis, abnormal 24-h Holter, larger LV end-diastolic diameters, and more impaired LVGLS were significantly associated with the endpoint; however, only LVGLS remained independently associated on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.7, P = 0.006]. Patients with LVGLS less than -17.3% were significantly more likely to be free of the primary endpoint (log-rank P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: LVGLS is impaired in sarcoidosis patients, suggesting subclinical cardiac dysfunction despite the absence of conventional evidence of cardiac disease, and is independently associated with occurrence of cardiac events and/or development of CS.
AIMS: Limited data exist on the risk of developing cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and/or adverse events in sarcoidosispatients. Using LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), an emerging sensitive parameter of LV function, we evaluated the prevalence of subclinical cardiac dysfunction in sarcoidosis and investigated whether LVGLS predicts adverse outcomes in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 130 patients with proven sarcoidosis undergoing echocardiography at our referral centre were identified. Following exclusion of those with evidence of CS (n = 14) or other pre-existing structural heart disease (n = 16), 100 patients (55 ± 13 years, 48% male, 90% pulmonary involvement) and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were included. LVGLS was measured by speckle-tracking analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, device implantation, new arrhythmias, or future development of CS on advanced cardiac imaging modalities. LVGLS was significantly impaired in sarcoidosispatients compared with controls (-17.3 ± 2.5 vs. -20.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001). Overall, 27 patients (27%) reached the endpoint during a median follow-up of 35 months. On Cox proportional hazards model analysis, abnormal 24-h Holter, larger LV end-diastolic diameters, and more impaired LVGLS were significantly associated with the endpoint; however, only LVGLS remained independently associated on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.7, P = 0.006]. Patients with LVGLS less than -17.3% were significantly more likely to be free of the primary endpoint (log-rank P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: LVGLS is impaired in sarcoidosispatients, suggesting subclinical cardiac dysfunction despite the absence of conventional evidence of cardiac disease, and is independently associated with occurrence of cardiac events and/or development of CS.
Authors: Sanjay Divakaran; Avinainder Singh; Bradley Collins; Tomas Vita; Rodney H Falk; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2017-01
Authors: Maria Vincenza Polito; Stephan Stoebe; Leonard Leifels; Patrick Stumpp; Kilian Solty; Gennaro Galasso; Federico Piscione; Ulrich Laufs; Karin Klingel; Andreas Hagendorff Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Patrizio Lancellotti; Fabien Hyafil; Ron Blankstein; Ronald G Schwartz; Wael A Jaber; Raymond Russell; Alessia Gimelli; François Rouzet; Marcus Hacker; Olivier Gheysens; Sven Plein; Edward J Miller; Sharmila Dorbala; Erwan Donal Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Gillian Murtagh; Luke J Laffin; Kershaw V Patel; Amit V Patel; Catherine A Bonham; Zoe Yu; Karima Addetia; Nadia El-Hangouche; Francesco Maffesanti; Victor Mor-Avi; D Kyle Hogarth; Nadera J Sweiss; John F Beshai; Roberto M Lang; Amit R Patel Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Yan Yatsynovich; Damian Valencia; Mikhail Petrov; Juan David Linares; Mufti M Rahman; Nathaniel Dittoe Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2018-08-07
Authors: Jian Chen; Juan Lei; Ernest Scalzetti; Mary McGrath; David Feiglin; Robert Voelker; Jingfeng Wang; Michael C Iannuzzi; Kan Liu Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-09-09 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Maria Giovanna Trivieri; Paolo Spagnolo; David Birnie; Peter Liu; Wonder Drake; Jason C Kovacic; Robert Baughman; Zahi A Fayad; Marc A Judson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nisha A Gilotra; Jan M Griffin; Noelle Pavlovic; Brian A Houston; Jessica Chasler; Colleen Goetz; Jonathan Chrispin; Michelle Sharp; Edward K Kasper; Edward S Chen; Ron Blankstein; Leslie T Cooper; Emer Joyce; Farooq H Sheikh Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2021-07-11 Impact factor: 5.712