Elisabeth A Donaldson1, Joanna E Cohen1, Lainie Rutkow2, Andrea C Villanti1, Norma F Kanarek3, Colleen L Barry2. 1. 1Department of Health,Behavior & Society,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,615 N. Wolfe Street,Baltimore,MD 21205,USA. 2. 3Department of Health Policy & Management,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore,MD,USA. 3. 5Department of Environmental Health Sciences,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore,MD,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of supporters and opponents of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax and to identify pro-tax messages that resonate with the public. DESIGN: A survey was administered by telephone in February 2013 to assess public opinion about a penny-per-ounce tax on SSB. Support was also examined for SSB consumption reduction and pro-tax messages. Individual characteristics including sociodemographics, political affiliation, SSB consumption behaviours and beliefs were explored as predictors of support using logistic regression. SETTING: A representative sample of voters was recruited from a Mid-Atlantic US state. SUBJECTS: The sample included 1000 registered voters. RESULTS: Findings indicate considerable support (50 %) for an SSB tax. Support was stronger among Democrats, those who believe SSB are a major cause of childhood obesity and those who believe childhood obesity warrants a societal intervention. Belief that a tax would be effective in lowering obesity rates was associated with support for the tax and pro-tax messages. Respondents reporting that a health-care provider had recommended they lose weight were less convinced by pro-tax messages. Women, Independents and those concerned about childhood obesity were more convinced by the SSB reduction messages. Overall, the most popular messages focused on the importance of reducing consumption among children without mentioning the tax. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding who supports and opposes SSB tax measures can assist advocates in developing strategies to maximize support for this type of intervention. Messages that focus on the effect of consumption on children may be useful in framing the discussion around SSB tax proposals.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of supporters and opponents of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax and to identify pro-tax messages that resonate with the public. DESIGN: A survey was administered by telephone in February 2013 to assess public opinion about a penny-per-ounce tax on SSB. Support was also examined for SSB consumption reduction and pro-tax messages. Individual characteristics including sociodemographics, political affiliation, SSB consumption behaviours and beliefs were explored as predictors of support using logistic regression. SETTING: A representative sample of voters was recruited from a Mid-Atlantic US state. SUBJECTS: The sample included 1000 registered voters. RESULTS: Findings indicate considerable support (50 %) for an SSB tax. Support was stronger among Democrats, those who believe SSB are a major cause of childhood obesity and those who believe childhood obesity warrants a societal intervention. Belief that a tax would be effective in lowering obesity rates was associated with support for the tax and pro-tax messages. Respondents reporting that a health-care provider had recommended they lose weight were less convinced by pro-tax messages. Women, Independents and those concerned about childhood obesity were more convinced by the SSB reduction messages. Overall, the most popular messages focused on the importance of reducing consumption among children without mentioning the tax. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding who supports and opposes SSB tax measures can assist advocates in developing strategies to maximize support for this type of intervention. Messages that focus on the effect of consumption on children may be useful in framing the discussion around SSB tax proposals.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carbonated beverages; Health policy; Nutrition policy; Obesity; Paediatric obesity
Authors: Brian K Kit; Tala H I Fakhouri; Sohyun Park; Samara Joy Nielsen; Cynthia L Ogden Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Vanessa M Oddo; Melissa A Knox; Lina Pinero Walkinshaw; Brian E Saelens; Nadine Chan; Jessica C Jones-Smith Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-04-30
Authors: Michelle Eykelenboom; Maartje M van Stralen; Margreet R Olthof; Carry M Renders; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Caroline L Miller; Joanne Dono; Melanie A Wakefield; Simone Pettigrew; John Coveney; David Roder; Sarah J Durkin; Gary Wittert; Jane Martin; Kerry A Ettridge Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Michelle Eykelenboom; Maartje M van Stralen; Margreet R Olthof; Linda J Schoonmade; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Carry M Renders Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Vanessa M Oddo; James Krieger; Melissa Knox; Brian E Saelens; Nadine Chan; Lina Pinero Walkinshaw; Mary Podrabsky; Jessica C Jones-Smith Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.295