OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the joint effects of water and sanitation infrastructure, are acting antagonistically (redundant services preventing the same cases of diarrhoeal disease), independently, or synergistically; and to assess how these effects vary by country and over time. METHODS: We used data from 217 Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 74 countries between 1986 and 2013. We used modified Poisson regression to assess the impact of water and sanitation infrastructure on the prevalence of diarrhoea among children under 5. RESULTS: The impact of water and sanitation varied across surveys, and adjusting for socio-economic status drove these estimates towards the null. Sanitation had a greater effect than water infrastructure when all 217 surveys were pooled; however, the impact of sanitation diminished over time. Based on survey data from the past 10 years, we saw no evidence for benefits in improving drinking water or sanitation alone, but we estimated a 6% reduction of both combined (prevalence ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence limit 0.91-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Water and sanitation interventions should be combined to maximise the number of cases of diarrhoeal disease prevented in children under 5. Further research should identify the sources of variability seen between countries and across time. These national surveys likely include substantial measurement error in the categorisation of water and sanitation, making it difficult to interpret the roles of other pathways.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the joint effects of water and sanitation infrastructure, are acting antagonistically (redundant services preventing the same cases of diarrhoeal disease), independently, or synergistically; and to assess how these effects vary by country and over time. METHODS: We used data from 217 Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 74 countries between 1986 and 2013. We used modified Poisson regression to assess the impact of water and sanitation infrastructure on the prevalence of diarrhoea among children under 5. RESULTS: The impact of water and sanitation varied across surveys, and adjusting for socio-economic status drove these estimates towards the null. Sanitation had a greater effect than water infrastructure when all 217 surveys were pooled; however, the impact of sanitation diminished over time. Based on survey data from the past 10 years, we saw no evidence for benefits in improving drinking water or sanitation alone, but we estimated a 6% reduction of both combined (prevalence ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence limit 0.91-0.98). CONCLUSIONS:Water and sanitation interventions should be combined to maximise the number of cases of diarrhoeal disease prevented in children under 5. Further research should identify the sources of variability seen between countries and across time. These national surveys likely include substantial measurement error in the categorisation of water and sanitation, making it difficult to interpret the roles of other pathways.
Keywords:
Agua; Censo demográfico y sanitario; Demographic and Health Surveys; Diarrea; Interacción; Saneamiento; analyse transversale; assainissement; cross-sectional analysis; diarrhoea; diarrhée; eau; enquêtes démographiques et de santé; estudio croseccional; interaction; sanitation; water
Authors: Christa L Fischer Walker; Igor Rudan; Li Liu; Harish Nair; Evropi Theodoratou; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Katherine L O'Brien; Harry Campbell; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tarique Md Nurul Huda; Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Amy J Pickering; Zahid Hayat Mahmud; Mohammad Sirajul Islam; Md Sajjadur Rahman; Stephen P Luby; Adam Biran Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Muhammad Shahbaz Farooq; Muhammad Uzair; Ali Raza; Madiha Habib; Yinlong Xu; Muhammad Yousuf; Seung Hwan Yang; Muhammad Ramzan Khan Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 6.627
Authors: Joshua V Garn; Charles S Mwandawiro; Birgit Nikolay; Carolyn D Drews-Botsch; Jimmy H Kihara; Simon J Brooker; Elses W Simiyu; Collins Okoyo; Matthew C Freeman Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Felix A Ogbo; Kingsley Agho; Pascal Ogeleka; Sue Woolfenden; Andrew Page; John Eastwood Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 3.240