Literature DB >> 25430562

Predictors of liver failure in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Pan Zhao1, Wei-wei Liu, Jin-feng Li, Chun-ya Wang, Hao Wang, Jun Xu, Rui-fang Wang, Hao-zhen Yang, Cheng Jin, Zhen-man Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The disease progression of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) varies significantly, and the prognostic markers that identify those patients who will develop liver failure have been scarcely studied from a Chinese cohort. Aims. We aimed to determine the predictive factors of liver failure in patients with PBC.
METHODS: Patients who were first diagnosed as PBC with hepatic compensation between January 2007 and December 2009 were enrolled in this cohort study.
RESULTS: Altogether 398 patients were finally included. Of these patients, 80% were women, 98% had positive antimitochondrial antibodies, and 45% had positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA). To December 2012, a total of 38 patients developed liver failure. According to the outcome, patients who developed liver failure had had higher serum concentration of baseline total bilirubin (TBil) (p = 0.013) and total bile acid (TBA) (p < 0.001), and lower concentrations of baseline total cholesterol (Tch) (p = 0.008), than patients who did not develop liver failure. Additionally, the proportion of ANA positivity was statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.009). In the established model for predicting liver failure in PBC, three variables were finally selected out, including Tch (odds ratio (OR) 0.552, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.394-0.774, p < 0.001), TBA (OR 1.006, 95% CI 1.002-1.010, p = 0.002), and ANA (+ versus -, OR 5.518, 95% CI 1.155-26.376, p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: ANA, Tch, and TBA are predictors of liver failure in PBC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Primary biliary cirrhosis; liver failure; predictor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25430562      PMCID: PMC4389007          DOI: 10.3109/03009734.2014.985763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ups J Med Sci        ISSN: 0300-9734            Impact factor:   2.384


Introduction

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease characterized by the destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts, which can lead to hepatic cirrhosis and eventually liver failure and death (1,2). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only drug accepted internationally for the treatment of PBC (3-5). However, a recent meta-analysis of 16 randomized clinical trials demonstrated no significant benefits of UDCA on all-cause mortality or liver transplantation in patients with PBC (6). In fact, the disease progression varies markedly among patients with PBC (7); moreover, substantial divergences of clinical characteristics exist because of variations in the populations under different studies (8,9). Thus, it is necessary in the early stage to determine the prognostic variables associated with the development of end-stage liver disease, so that physicians can closely monitor the disease progress and adjust treatment measures in a timely manner before fatal events occur. In the present study, we aim to study the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with the development of liver failure in a prospective cohort with PBC.

Patients and methods

Patients

Patients who were first diagnosed as PBC with hepatic compensation between January 2007 and December 2009 in Beijing 302 Hospital were enrolled in this cohort study. All of these included patients had received UDCA therapy at the initial diagnosis of PBC. Exclusion criteria included the concurrence of autoimmune hepatitis or extra-hepatic autoimmune diseases; infection with hepatitis A, B, C, D, E, Epstein–Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, or human immunodeficiency virus; the presence of other forms of liver diseases such as alcoholic liver disease, drug-induced hepatitis, or Wilson’s disease; the use of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs for a period of more than 2 weeks; and UDCA non-responders. Liver failure in this study was defined as coagulopathy (prothrombin activity (PTA) ≤40% or international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5) and jaundice (serum total bilirubin (TBil) ≥171 μmol/L or a daily increase ≥17.1 μmol/L). The study was performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing 302 Hospital.

Laboratory tests

Biochemical profiles, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBil), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin, total cholesterol (Tch), and total bile acid (TBA) were measured using standard laboratory procedures. Normalized serum concentrations of ALT, AST, TBil, GGT, ALP, albumin, Tch, and TBA were, respectively, <40 U/L, <40 U/L, <17.1 μmol/L, 7–32 U/L, 40–150 U/L, 35–55 g/L, 2.8–5.2 mmol/L, and 0–10 μmol/L. Serum autoantibodies, including antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) and antinuclear antibodies (ANA), were tested using indirect immunofluorescence with standard methods (Euroimmun Medizinnische Labordiagnostika AG, Lubeck, Germany), and sera were considered to be positive when they produced a reaction at a dilution of ≥1:100. Immunoglobulin (Ig) was assayed by means of immunological turbidometry (Diasys Diagnostic Systems, Shanghai, China). Normal serum concentrations of IgA, IgG, and IgM were 0.69–3.28 g/L, 7.23–16.6 g/L, and 0.63–2.77 g/L, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Continuous data were expressed as medians (interquartile range). Categorical data were expressed as the number of subjects. Group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables, and chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Logistic regression was used for evaluating prognostic predictors of liver failure. A probability (p) value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Finally, 398 patients were included. In these patients, 317 (80%) were female and 81 (20%) were male. The average age was 57 (12) years. A total of 389 patients had positive AMA, and 9 had negative AMA; 182 patients had positive ANA, and 216 had negative ANA. In the years 2007, 2008, and 2009, 80, 147, and 171 patients were enrolled (Figure 1). To December 2012, a total of 38 patients had developed liver failure (Figure 2).
Figure 1.

Patient enrollment.

Figure 2.

Cumulative incidence of liver failure in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis during follow-up.

Patient enrollment. Cumulative incidence of liver failure in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis during follow-up.

Univariate analysis for baseline variables in PBC

According to the outcome, patients who developed liver failure had had higher serum concentrations of baseline TBil (43.7 μmol/L versus 23.2 μmol/L, p = 0.013) and TBA (92.5 μmol/L versus 46.0 μmol/L, p < 0.001) and lower serum concentrations of baseline Tch (3.09 mmol/L versus 4.52 mmol/L, p = 0.008) than patients who did not develop liver failure (Table I). In addition, the proportion of ANA positivity differed between the two groups. Thus, a majority of the patients who developed liver failure had positive ANA (65.79% versus 43.61%, p = 0.009).
Table I.

Comparison of baseline characteristics at entry between patients with and without liver failure.

ParametersPatients not developing liver failure (n = 360)Patients who developed liver failure (n = 38)p value
Sex (male/female)75/2856/320.463
Age (years)55 (15)60 (11)0.056
ALT (U/L)52 (58)56 (70)0.899
AST (U/L)70 (61)88 (85)0.094
ALT (U/L)169 (118)176 (112)0.736
GGT (U/L)217 (288)238 (278)0.552
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)23.2 (44.5)43.7 (46.3)0.013
Albumin (g/L)36 (7)35 (6)0.905
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.52 (2.91)3.09 (2.11)0.008
Total bile acid (μmol/L)46.0 (91.0)92.5 (97.0)< 0.001
IgA (g/L)2.81 (1.67)3.81 (3.76)0.070
IgM (g/L)2.81 (3.23)2.01 (1.65)0.099
IgG (g/L)15.69 (8.49)17.92 (8.94)0.224
AMA (+/–)352/837/10.599
ANA (+/–)157/20325/130.009

Continuous data were expressed as median (interquartile range).

Comparison of baseline characteristics at entry between patients with and without liver failure. Continuous data were expressed as median (interquartile range).

Predictors of liver failure in PBC

Three variables were eventually selected out to predict the development of liver failure in PBC using logistic regression, including Tch (odds ratio (OR) 0.552, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.394–0.774, p < 0.001), TBA (OR 1.006, 95% CI 1.002–1.010, p = 0.002), and ANA (+ versus –, OR 5.518, 95% CI 1.155–26.376, p = 0.032) (Table II).
Table II.

Predictors of liver failure in primary biliary cirrhosis.

ParametersOdds ratio (95% CI)Standardized odds ratio (95% CI)p value
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)0.552 (0.394–0.774)0.313 (0.162–0.606)< 0.001
Total bile acid (μmol/L) 1.006 (1.002–1.010)1.397 (1.130–1.727)0.002
ANA (+ versus –)5.518 (1.155–26.376)5.518 (1.155–26.376)0.032
Predictors of liver failure in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Discussion

PBC is a chronic and progressive cholestatic disease, and its pathogenesis remains unclear (10-12). Due to lack of curative therapeutics, liver failure is an evitable severe outcome in the majority of such patients. So, studying factors associated with the development of liver failure has vital and practical value. Beijing 302 Hospital is the largest hospital specializing in hepatology in China. Therefore, such an investigation on the risk of incipient liver failure in a large number of PBC patients possesses certain representativeness. Previous studies have shown that patients with PBC often have higher serum concentrations of cholesterol (13-15). Because the synthetic and metabolic process of cholesterol is closely associated with the function of the liver, the development and progression of liver diseases can influence the serum concentrations of cholesterol. In our study, patients with lower total serum cholesterol concentrations were more likely to develop liver failure than patients with higher concentrations. TBA has been less studied than other serum markers in the evaluation of the prognosis of PBC. Based on our study, it was an independent risk factor for liver failure in PBC. As previously shown, cholestasis is a main physiopathological characteristic of PBC. It can cause the accumulation of hydrophobic bile acids in the liver, which are toxic to cellular membranes (16,17). So, an increase of serum TBA may mirror the disease severity in PBC. It has been reported that ANA can be found in 30%–50% of all PBC patients, and disease-specific ANA are associated with a more severe and rapidly progressing disease (18-20). In the present study, ANA were detected in 46% of the patients and proved to be related to the occurrence of liver failure. Regarding other early variables, such as ALP, GGT, and IgM, no correlations with the development of liver failure were observed, though some of them had definitely diagnostic value. In conclusion, ANA positivity, a lower serum concentration of Tch, and higher serum concentration of TBA are all associated with the development of liver failure in PBC.
  20 in total

1.  American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases endpoints conference: design and endpoints for clinical trials in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Marina G Silveira; Elizabeth M Brunt; Jenny Heathcote; Gregory J Gores; Keith D Lindor; Marlyn J Mayo
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Disease-specific autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Dimitrios P Bogdanos; Lars Komorowski
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Clinical significance of the fluctuation of primary biliary cirrhosis-related autoantibodies during the course of the disease.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Gatselis; Kalliopi Zachou; Gary L Norman; Stella Gabeta; Panagiotis Papamichalis; George K Koukoulis; George N Dalekos
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.815

4.  Primary biliary cirrhosis--phenotypic characterization of immunocompetent cells in peripheral blood and liver tissue.

Authors:  A Karlsson-Parra; A Nyberg; T H Tötterman; L Lööf; U Forsum
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.384

5.  Primary biliary cirrhosis in Brunei Darussalam.

Authors:  Vui Heng Chong; Pemasiri Upali Telisinghe; Anand Jalihal
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2010-12

Review 6.  Risk factors and prediction of long-term outcome in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Hiromi Ishibashi; Atsumasa Komori; Shinji Shimoda; Yoko M Ambrosini; M Eric Gershwin; Minoru Nakamura
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 1.271

7.  Randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of simvastatin in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  William J Cash; Stephen O'Neill; Mark E O'Donnell; David R McCance; Ian S Young; Jane McEneny; Neil I McDougall; Michael E Callender
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.828

8.  Diagnostic and clinical significance of anti-centromere antibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Liberal; Charlotte R Grant; Lazaros Sakkas; Nicola Bizzaro; Dimitrios P Bogdanos
Journal:  Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Hyperlipidaemic state and cardiovascular risk in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  M Longo; A Crosignani; P M Battezzati; C Squarcia Giussani; P Invernizzi; M Zuin; M Podda
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Treatment of hypercholesterolemia in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis might be more beneficial than indicated.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Balmer; Jean-François Dufour
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 2.193

View more
  3 in total

1.  Major Hepatic Complications in Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Treated Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Risk Factors and Time Trends in Incidence and Outcome.

Authors:  Maren H Harms; Willem J Lammers; Douglas Thorburn; Christophe Corpechot; Pietro Invernizzi; Harry L A Janssen; Pier M Battezzati; Frederik Nevens; Keith D Lindor; Annarosa Floreani; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Marlyn J Mayo; George N Dalekos; Tony Bruns; Albert Parés; Andrew L Mason; Xavier Verhelst; Kris V Kowdley; Jorn C Goet; Gideon M Hirschfield; Bettina E Hansen; Henk R van Buuren
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Biomarkers for primary biliary cholangitis: current perspectives.

Authors:  Elias Kouroumalis; Demetrius Samonakis; Argyro Voumvouraki
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2018-06-18

Review 3.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Ying-Qiu Huang
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.