| Literature DB >> 25430516 |
Junqiang Li1, Zengxia Mei1, Lishu Liu1, Huili Liang1, Alexander Azarov2, Andrej Kuznetsov2, Yaoping Liu1, Ailing Ji3, Qingbo Meng1, Xiaolong Du1.
Abstract
Nitrogen doping is a promising method of engineering the electronic structure of a metal oxide to modify its optical and electrical properties; however, the doping effect strongly depends on the types of defects introduced. Herein, we report a comparative study of nitrogen-doping-induced defects in Cu2O. Even in the lightly doped samples, a considerable number of nitrogen interstitials (Ni) formed, accompanied by nitrogen substitutions (NO) and oxygen vacancies (VO). In the course of high-temperature annealing, these Ni atoms interacted with VO, resulting in an increase in NO and decreases in Ni and VO. The properties of the annealed sample were significantly modified as a result. Our results suggest that Ni is a significant defect type in nitrogen-doped Cu2O.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25430516 PMCID: PMC5384195 DOI: 10.1038/srep07240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Typical XRD θ-2θ scans of the samples and (b) in situ RHEED patterns of undoped Cu2O sample, which are similar to those of Cu2O:N.
Figure 2Hole density, hole mobility, and resistivity of (a) Cu2O:N samples annealed at 750°C as functions of the nitrogen plasma power (a power of 0 W represents an undoped sample) and (b) Cu2O:N samples doped with a nitrogen plasma power of 200 W as functions of the annealing temperature.
Figure 3Nitrogen concentration versus depth profiles in Cu2O:N samples.
Figure 4Photoluminescence spectra of (a) Cu2O samples, (b) Cu2O:N samples doped at 200 W, and (c) enlarged portion of (b) in the vicinity of the exciton emission.
Figure 5XPS (a) Cu 2p spectra, and (b) normalized O 1s spectra of Cu2O and Cu2O:N samples.
Figure 6Cu LMM spectra demonstrated with 5 different components for the Cu2O (left column) and Cu2O:N (right column).
Summary of the Cu LMM peak-fitting parameters
| Sample | Peak | K.E. [eV] | Intensity | FWHM [eV] | Intensity ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 916.8 | 19252.42 | 2.10 | 2.56 | |
| 2 | 918.3 | 7519.22 | 1.52 | ||
| 1 | 916.7 | 22386.87 | 2.10 | 3.61 | |
| 2 | 918.3 | 6193.66 | 1.52 | ||
| 1 | 916.8 | 12843.29 | 2.30 | 2.43 | |
| 2 | 918.3 | 5276.19 | 1.52 | ||
| 1 | 916.8 | 18128.31 | 2.20 | 6.83 | |
| 2 | 918.3 | 2655.39 | 1.52 |