OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and demographic profile of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis, among newly admitted children in different age groups in a hospital in North India. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a referral care centre in Northern India. All children, age group 0 to <18 y, admitted on days selected for study were screened and those with abnormal temperature and abnormal leukocyte count were included for further assessment. A total of twenty "24 h" periods were randomly chosen during the study period. Patients were assessed according to age specific vital signs and laboratory values to diagnose Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis and to gain clinical and demographic data. The criteria laid at International consensus conference, 2002, were used to define patients as SIRS, Sepsis, Severe sepsis and Septic shock. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 865 patients were screened for SIRS. Prevalence of SIRS amongst hospitalised children was 23 % (n = 201). Seventy nine percent (n = 159) of patients had infection associated SIRS and 21 % (42) had non-infective SIRS. Sixty four percent (n = 129) SIRS patients had uncomplicated sepsis, 15 % (n = 30) patients fulfilled criteria for severe sepsis. Out of the latter 30, 19 had septic shock. Organ dysfunction in SIRS was noted in 25 % (n = 51). 37.25 % (n = 19) had multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 9). Focus of infection in majority was pulmonary (44 %). Mean duration of antibiotic therapy and hospital stay in the SIRS group were 6.4 and 6.5 d respectively. In the group without SIRS, mean duration were 2.44 d and 3.07 d respectively The differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the proportion of sepsis contributing to SIRS is high in a tertiary care hospital. Therefore rapid recognition of SIRS is essential. Goal directed treatment of sepsis is also important so that high mortality associated with severe sepsis and septic shock are prevented.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and demographic profile of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis, among newly admitted children in different age groups in a hospital in North India. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a referral care centre in Northern India. All children, age group 0 to <18 y, admitted on days selected for study were screened and those with abnormal temperature and abnormal leukocyte count were included for further assessment. A total of twenty "24 h" periods were randomly chosen during the study period. Patients were assessed according to age specific vital signs and laboratory values to diagnose Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis and to gain clinical and demographic data. The criteria laid at International consensus conference, 2002, were used to define patients as SIRS, Sepsis, Severe sepsis and Septic shock. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 865 patients were screened for SIRS. Prevalence of SIRS amongst hospitalised children was 23 % (n = 201). Seventy nine percent (n = 159) of patients had infection associated SIRS and 21 % (42) had non-infective SIRS. Sixty four percent (n = 129) SIRS patients had uncomplicated sepsis, 15 % (n = 30) patients fulfilled criteria for severe sepsis. Out of the latter 30, 19 had septic shock. Organ dysfunction in SIRS was noted in 25 % (n = 51). 37.25 % (n = 19) had multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 9). Focus of infection in majority was pulmonary (44 %). Mean duration of antibiotic therapy and hospital stay in the SIRS group were 6.4 and 6.5 d respectively. In the group without SIRS, mean duration were 2.44 d and 3.07 d respectively The differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the proportion of sepsis contributing to SIRS is high in a tertiary care hospital. Therefore rapid recognition of SIRS is essential. Goal directed treatment of sepsis is also important so that high mortality associated with severe sepsis and septic shock are prevented.
Authors: R Scott Watson; Joseph A Carcillo; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Gilles Clermont; Jeffrey Lidicker; Derek C Angus Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-11-14 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Anthony O Onipede; Adedeji A Onayade; Jerome B E Elusiyan; Perpetua O Obiajunwa; Ezra O O Ogundare; Olarinde O Olaniran; Lateef A Adeyemi; Oyeku O Oyelami Journal: J Infect Dev Ctries Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 0.968
Authors: John S Giuliano; Barry P Markovitz; Joe Brierley; Richard Levin; Gary Williams; Lucy Chai See Lum; Tavey Dorofaeff; Pablo Cruces; Jenny L Bush; Luke Keele; Vinay M Nadkarni; Neal J Thomas; Julie C Fitzgerald; Scott L Weiss Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Matthew O Wiens; Charles P Larson; Elias Kumbakumba; Niranjan Kissoon; J Mark Ansermino; Joel Singer; Hubert Wong; Andrew Ndamira; Jerome Kabakyenga; Peter Moschovis; Julius Kiwanuka Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Antje Wulff; Sara Montag; Bianca Steiner; Michael Marschollek; Philipp Beerbaum; André Karch; Thomas Jack Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 2.692