AIM: To conduct a concept analysis of clinical practice contexts (work environments) that facilitate or militate against the uptake of research evidence by healthcare professionals in clinical practice. This will involve developing a clear definition of context by describing its features, domains and defining characteristics. BACKGROUND: The context where clinical care is delivered influences that care. While research shows that context is important to knowledge translation (implementation), we lack conceptual clarity on what is context, which contextual factors probably modify the effect of knowledge translation interventions (and hence should be considered when designing interventions) and which contextual factors themselves could be targeted as part of a knowledge translation intervention (context modification). DESIGN: Concept analysis. METHODS: The Walker and Avant concept analysis method, comprised of eight systematic steps, will be used: (1) concept selection; (2) determination of aims; (3) identification of uses of context; (4) determination of defining attributes of context; (5) identification/construction of a model case of context; (6) identification/construction of additional cases of context; (7) identification/construction of antecedents and consequences of context; and (8) definition of empirical referents of context. This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (January 2014). DISCUSSION: This study will result in a much needed framework of context for knowledge translation, which identifies specific elements that, if assessed and used to tailor knowledge translation activities, will result in increased research use by nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, ultimately leading to better patient care.
AIM: To conduct a concept analysis of clinical practice contexts (work environments) that facilitate or militate against the uptake of research evidence by healthcare professionals in clinical practice. This will involve developing a clear definition of context by describing its features, domains and defining characteristics. BACKGROUND: The context where clinical care is delivered influences that care. While research shows that context is important to knowledge translation (implementation), we lack conceptual clarity on what is context, which contextual factors probably modify the effect of knowledge translation interventions (and hence should be considered when designing interventions) and which contextual factors themselves could be targeted as part of a knowledge translation intervention (context modification). DESIGN: Concept analysis. METHODS: The Walker and Avant concept analysis method, comprised of eight systematic steps, will be used: (1) concept selection; (2) determination of aims; (3) identification of uses of context; (4) determination of defining attributes of context; (5) identification/construction of a model case of context; (6) identification/construction of additional cases of context; (7) identification/construction of antecedents and consequences of context; and (8) definition of empirical referents of context. This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (January 2014). DISCUSSION: This study will result in a much needed framework of context for knowledge translation, which identifies specific elements that, if assessed and used to tailor knowledge translation activities, will result in increased research use by nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, ultimately leading to better patient care.
Authors: Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Ansgar Gerhardus; Kati Mozygemba; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Andrew Booth; Bjørn Hofmann; Philip Wahlster; Stephanie Polus; Jacob Burns; Louise Brereton; Eva Rehfuess Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: David Beran; Maria Lazo-Porras; Maria Kathia Cardenas; François Chappuis; Albertino Damasceno; Nilambar Jha; Tavares Madede; Sarah Lachat; Silvana Perez Leon; Nathaly Aya Pastrana; Maria Amalia Pesantes; Suman Bahadur Singh; Sanjib Sharma; Claire Somerville; L Suzanne Suggs; J Jaime Miranda Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2018-11-16
Authors: Nadine E Andrew; Sandy Middleton; Rohan Grimley; Craig S Anderson; Geoffrey A Donnan; Natasha A Lannin; Enna Stroil-Salama; Brenda Grabsch; Monique F Kilkenny; Janet E Squires; Dominique A Cadilhac Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Kendall Searle; Grant Blashki; Ritsuko Kakuma; Hui Yang; Shurong Lu; Baoqi Li; Yingying Xiao; Harry Minas Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Bobby Lee Maher; Jillian Guthrie; Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss; Margaret Cargo; Raymond Lovett Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Janet E Squires; Ian D Graham; Alison M Hutchinson; Susan Michie; Jill J Francis; Anne Sales; Jamie Brehaut; Janet Curran; Noah Ivers; John Lavis; Stefanie Linklater; Shannon Fenton; Thomas Noseworthy; Jocelyn Vine; Jeremy M Grimshaw Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: April Morrow; Katherine M Tucker; Tim J Shaw; Bonny Parkinson; Charles Abraham; Luke Wolfenden; Natalie Taylor Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692