Literature DB >> 25429904

Understanding context in knowledge translation: a concept analysis study protocol.

Janet E Squires1, Ian D Graham, Alison M Hutchinson, Stefanie Linklater, Jamie C Brehaut, Janet Curran, Noah Ivers, John N Lavis, Susan Michie, Anne E Sales, Michelle Fiander, Shannon Fenton, Thomas Noseworthy, Jocelyn Vine, Jeremy M Grimshaw.   

Abstract

AIM: To conduct a concept analysis of clinical practice contexts (work environments) that facilitate or militate against the uptake of research evidence by healthcare professionals in clinical practice. This will involve developing a clear definition of context by describing its features, domains and defining characteristics.
BACKGROUND: The context where clinical care is delivered influences that care. While research shows that context is important to knowledge translation (implementation), we lack conceptual clarity on what is context, which contextual factors probably modify the effect of knowledge translation interventions (and hence should be considered when designing interventions) and which contextual factors themselves could be targeted as part of a knowledge translation intervention (context modification).
DESIGN: Concept analysis.
METHODS: The Walker and Avant concept analysis method, comprised of eight systematic steps, will be used: (1) concept selection; (2) determination of aims; (3) identification of uses of context; (4) determination of defining attributes of context; (5) identification/construction of a model case of context; (6) identification/construction of additional cases of context; (7) identification/construction of antecedents and consequences of context; and (8) definition of empirical referents of context. This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (January 2014). DISCUSSION: This study will result in a much needed framework of context for knowledge translation, which identifies specific elements that, if assessed and used to tailor knowledge translation activities, will result in increased research use by nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, ultimately leading to better patient care.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  concept analysis; context; knowledge translation; nurses; work organization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25429904     DOI: 10.1111/jan.12574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  11 in total

1.  Implementation, context and complexity.

Authors:  Carl R May; Mark Johnson; Tracy Finch
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 2.  Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework.

Authors:  Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Ansgar Gerhardus; Kati Mozygemba; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Andrew Booth; Bjørn Hofmann; Philip Wahlster; Stephanie Polus; Jacob Burns; Louise Brereton; Eva Rehfuess
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Moving from formative research to co-creation of interventions: insights from a community health system project in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru.

Authors:  David Beran; Maria Lazo-Porras; Maria Kathia Cardenas; François Chappuis; Albertino Damasceno; Nilambar Jha; Tavares Madede; Sarah Lachat; Silvana Perez Leon; Nathaly Aya Pastrana; Maria Amalia Pesantes; Suman Bahadur Singh; Sanjib Sharma; Claire Somerville; L Suzanne Suggs; J Jaime Miranda
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-16

4.  Hospital organizational context and delivery of evidence-based stroke care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nadine E Andrew; Sandy Middleton; Rohan Grimley; Craig S Anderson; Geoffrey A Donnan; Natasha A Lannin; Enna Stroil-Salama; Brenda Grabsch; Monique F Kilkenny; Janet E Squires; Dominique A Cadilhac
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Development of the Translating Allied Health Knowledge (TAHK) Framework.

Authors:  Danielle Hitch; Genevieve Pepin; Kate Lhuede; Sue Rowan; Susan Giles
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-07-01

6.  Adapting the depression component of WHO Mental Health Gap Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG.v2) for primary care in Shenzhen, China: a DELPHI study.

Authors:  Kendall Searle; Grant Blashki; Ritsuko Kakuma; Hui Yang; Shurong Lu; Baoqi Li; Yingying Xiao; Harry Minas
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2022-02-15

7.  Defining collective capability in Australian evaluations that are conducted by, for and with Indigenous peoples for health programmes, policies and services: a concept analysis protocol.

Authors:  Bobby Lee Maher; Jillian Guthrie; Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss; Margaret Cargo; Raymond Lovett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Delta Studies: Expanding the Concept of Deviance Studies to Design More Effective Improvement Interventions.

Authors:  Alex H S Harris; Hildi J Hagedorn; Andrea K Finlay
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol.

Authors:  Janet E Squires; Ian D Graham; Alison M Hutchinson; Susan Michie; Jill J Francis; Anne Sales; Jamie Brehaut; Janet Curran; Noah Ivers; John Lavis; Stefanie Linklater; Shannon Fenton; Thomas Noseworthy; Jocelyn Vine; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Understanding implementation success: protocol for an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial testing methods to improve detection of Lynch syndrome in Australian hospitals.

Authors:  April Morrow; Katherine M Tucker; Tim J Shaw; Bonny Parkinson; Charles Abraham; Luke Wolfenden; Natalie Taylor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.