Literature DB >> 25429421

Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary angle-closure glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial.

Arun Narayanaswamy1, Christopher K Leung2, Donny V Istiantoro3, Shamira A Perera1, Ching-Lin Ho1, Monisha E Nongpiur1, Mani Baskaran1, Hla M Htoon1, Tina T Wong1, David Goh1, Daniel H Su1, Michael Belkin4, Tin Aung5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) should be explored as a therapeutic option in eyes with angle closure.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of SLT in eyes with primary angle closure (PAC) and PAC glaucoma (PACG). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial at tertiary eye care institutions of 100 patients diagnosed as having PAC or PAC glaucoma in which the angles had opened at least 180° (visible posterior trabecular meshwork on gonioscopy) after laser iridotomy. Recruitment and baseline were completed from June 2009 to April 2012 and 6-month follow-up was completed from December 2009 to November 2012.
INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients with a baseline IOP greater than 21 mm Hg were randomized to either SLT or prostaglandin analog (PGA; travoprost, 0.004%). The SLT was repeated if the IOP reduction was less than 20.0% from baseline at the 1- or 3-month follow-up visit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the change in IOP from baseline to the final follow-up visit (at 6 months). The frequency of additional postoperative treatments and complications were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Fifty patients (96 eyes) were randomized to SLT and 50 patients (99 eyes) to PGA medical therapy. At 6 months, 49 patients in the SLT group and 47 in the PGA group completed follow-up. Analysis was based on intent to treat. At 6 months, IOP decreased by 4.0 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.2-4.8) in the SLT group (P < .001) and by 4.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.5-4.9) in the PGA group (P < .001). There were no differences between the SLT and PGA groups in the absolute mean reduction of IOP (4.0 vs 4.2 mm Hg, respectively; P = .78) or in the percentage of reduction in IOP (16.9% vs 18.5%, respectively; P = .52). Complete success (IOP ≤21 mm Hg without medications) was achieved in 60.0% eyes of the SLT group, compared with 84.0% of eyes in the PGA group (P = .008). No patients required glaucoma surgery. Additional medications were required in 22.0% of patients in the SLT group compared with 8.0% in the PGA group (P = .05). One patient in the SLT group (2.0%) had a transient posttreatment IOP spike greater than 5 mm Hg. The mean endothelial cell count showed a significant decrease from baseline in the SLT arm (4.8% decrease; P = .001). No other events such as persistent uveitis or increase in peripheral anterior synechiae were noted in eyes that underwent SLT. Two patients in the PGA group exited owing to drug-related complications (1 patient with uveitis and 1 with allergic conjunctivitis). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Eyes with PAC or PACG respond to SLT in the short term, but the overall long-term therapeutic effectiveness needs further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01004900.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25429421     DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  16 in total

Review 1.  Could adverse effects and complications of selective laser trabeculoplasty be decreased by low-power laser therapy?

Authors:  Alexandre de Carvalho Mendes Paiva; Adenilson de Souza da Fonseca
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Selective laser trabeculoplasty: past, present, and future.

Authors:  A Garg; G Gazzard
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary angle closure disease.

Authors:  Srishti Raj; Basavraj Tigari; T T Faisal; Natasha Gautam; Sushmita Kaushik; Parul Ichhpujani; Surinder S Pandav; Jagat Ram
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Selective laser trabeculoplasty is safe and effective in patients previously treated with prostaglandin analogs: An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Raul E Ruiz-Lozano; Jimena Alamillo-Velazquez; Gustavo Ortiz-Morales; Lucas A Garza-Garza; Manuel E Quiroga-Garza; Carlos Alvarez-Guzman; Alejandro Rodriguez-Garcia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 5.  A Review of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: "The Hype Is Real".

Authors:  Tomislav Sarenac; Anela Bečić Turkanović; Peter Ferme; Tomaž Gračner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Lasers in Glaucoma: an Overview.

Authors:  Bhawesh Chandra Saha; Rashmi Kumari; Bibhuti Prasanna Sinha; Anita Ambasta; Sanjeev Kumar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Effect of alpha-2-agonist premedication on intraocular pressure after selective laser trabeculoplasty.

Authors:  Julius T Oatts; Xiaofei Wang; Nils A Loewen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 8.  A Review of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Recent Findings and Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Yujia Zhou; Ahmad A Aref
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-03-03

Review 9.  Lasers in glaucoma.

Authors:  Harsh Kumar; Tarannum Mansoori; Gazella B Warjri; Bindu I Somarajan; Suman Bandil; Viney Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Protects Glaucoma Progression in the Initial Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Angle-Closure Glaucoma after Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in the Long Term.

Authors:  Natalia Ivanovna Kurysheva; Lyudmila Vyacheslavovna Lepeshkina
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.