| Literature DB >> 25428999 |
Haihai Wang1, Chunmei Jiang1, Cuiting Wang1, Yang Yang1, Lei Yang2, Xiaoyan Gao1, Hongxia Zhang3.
Abstract
<span class="Gene">Fasciclin-like <span class="Disease">arabinogalactan proteins (FLAs) play important roles in the growth and development of roots, stems, and seeds in Arabidopsis. However, their biological functions in woody plants are largely unknown. In this work, we investigated the possible function of PtFLA6 in poplar. Quantitative real-time PCR, PtFLA6-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fusion protein subcellular localization, Western blotting, and immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated that the PtFLA6 gene was expressed specifically in the xylem of mature stem, and PtFLA6 protein was distributed ubiquitous in plant cells and accumulated predominantly in stem xylem fibres. Antisense expression of PtFLA6 in the aspen hybrid clone Poplar davidiana×Poplar bolleana reduced the transcripts of PtFLA6 and its homologous genes. Transgenic plants that showed a significant reduction in the transcripts of PtFLAs accumulated fewer PtFLA6 and arabinogalactan proteins than did the non-transgenic plants, leading to reduced stem flexural strength and stiffness. Further studies revealed that the altered stem biomechanics of transgenic plants could be attributed to the decreased cellulose and lignin composition in the xylem. In addition expression of some xylem-specific genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis was downregulated in these transgenic plants. All these results suggest that engineering the expression of PtFLA6 and its homologues could modulate stem mechanical properties by affecting cell wall composition in trees.Entities:
Keywords: Biomechanics; Populus; cell wall; fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein; transgenic plant; xylem.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25428999 PMCID: PMC4339592 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Expression analysis of PtFLA6. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of PtFLA6 in poplar. The y-axis represents the log2 fold change of PtFLA6 in various tissues of poplar compared with PtEF1β. AP, apex; ML, mature leaf; MPe, mature leaf petiole; UP, upper stem phloem; UX, upper stem xylem; MP, middle stem phloem; MX, middle stem xylem; BP, basal stem phloem; BX, basal stem xylem; R, root. Experiment was repeated three times using different batches of plants. (B) Western blot analysis of PtFLA6 in poplar stem. Total proteins were extracted from the phloem and xylem of middle stems of poplar. About 20 μg of protein was electrophoresed by 10% SDS-PAGE and hybridized with anti-PtFLA6 antibodies. M, protein molecular weight marker; FLA6+GST, fusion protein; P, protein isolated from the phloem of middle stems; X, protein isolated from the xylem of middle stems. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 2.Immunolocalization of PtFLA6 in the stems of poplar. (A–I) Cross-sections of stems at the upper, middle, and basal positions of greenhouse-grown plants were hybridized with anti-PtFLA6 antibodies, respectively. (D) and (E), (F) and (G), and (H) and (I) show high magnification of the framed areas in (A), (B), and (C), respectively. (J–R) Negative controls of (A), (B), and (C) hybridized with pre-immune IgG. (M) and (N), (O) and (P), and (Q) and (R) show high magnification of the framed areas in (J), (K), and (L), respectively. Pf, phloem fibre cell; Ca, cambia; X, xylem; Ve, vessel cell; Xf, xylem fibre cell. Blue staining indicates PtFLA6 signals. Bars, 100 μm (A–C, J–L); 25 μm, (D–I, M–R). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 3.Immunocytolocalization of PtFLA6 in the xylem fibre cells of poplar stem. Transverse ultrathin sections of the xylem cells from 3-month-old poplar stems were used for immunogold-labelling TEM analysis. (A) A PtFLA6 signal was observed in both the cytoplasm and cell wall of xylem fibre cells. (B, C) High magnification of the framed areas in (A). (D) Negative control of (A). No signal was detected. (E, F) High magnification of the framed areas in (D). Black dots indicated by arrows in (B) and (C) indicate the immunogold signallings. PW, primary wall; SW, secondary wall. Bars, 250nm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 4.Subcellular localization of PtFLA6 protein. PtFLA6 or YFP alone were transiently expressed in the protoplasts of Shanxin yang, incubated in dark for 12h and observed with a confocal microscope. Bar, 5 μm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 5.Molecular, phenotypic, and histochemical analysis of PtFLA6 antisense transgenic plants. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of PtFLA6 in the xylem of WT and PtFLA6 antisense transgenic plants (lines L4 and L14). Total RNA was isolated from the xylem tissues of 3-month-old plants grown in a greenhouse. The experiment was performed three times using different batches of plants. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) of three technical replicates using pooled samples of three independent plants. The expression level of PtFLA6 in the xylem of the WT was set to 1. (B) Western blot analysis. Total proteins were extracted from the xylem tissue in WT and transgenic plants. About 20 μg of protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and hybridized with anti-PtFLA6 and anti-actin antibodies, respectively. Expression of PtFLA6 in the xylem of the WT was set to 1. M, protein molecular weight marker; FLA6+GST, fusion protein for antibody production; WT, protein isolated from the xylem of WT plants; L4 and L14, protein isolated from the xylem of transgenic lines L4 and L14. (C) Phenotypes of 3-month-old WT and transgenic plants (lines L4 and L14) grown in a greenhouse. Bar, 10cm. (D–F) Cellular morphology of the stems from the WT (D) and transgenic lines L4 (E) and L14 (F). Transverse sections of the middle stems were stained with 0.05% toluidine blue. X, xylem. Bars, 1mm. (G–I) Transmission electron micrographs of xylary fibres in the stem of the WT (G) and transgenic lines L4 (H) and L14 (I). XF, xylem fibre cell. Bars, 5 μm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 6.Biomechanical analysis of WT and transgenic plants (lines L4 and L14). (A) Flexural strength test. (B) Flexural stiffness test. Basal stems of WT and transgenic plants were used. Values are means±SD of 10 independent plants of WT and each transgenic line. Values labelled with different letters are significantly different (P<0.01). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 7.Gene expression and AGP composition analyses of WT and transgenic plants (lines L4 and L14). (A) Expression of the other nine PtFLAs in the xylem tissues of WT and transgenic plants. Total RNA was isolated from the stems of 3-month-old plants grown in a greenhouse. The experiment was performed three times using different batches of plants. Error bars represent the SD of three technical replicates using pooled samples of three independent plants. The expression values of the WT were set to 1. (B) AGP content analysis. Rocket Yariv agarose gel electrophoresis was performed. Gum arabic or plant proteins, extracted from the xylem tissues of the WT and transgenic plants, were run on an agarose gel containing 10 µg ml–1 of β-glucosyl Yariv reagent. Concentrations of 0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 µg of gum arabic were used as standard. The peak area represents the content of AGPs. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 8.Comparison of lignin and cellulose content in the xylem tissues of the WT and transgenic plants (lines L4 and L14). (A) Lignin content. (B) Cellulose content. Three individual plants were sampled for each transgenic line. Error bars show SD (n=3). Values labelled with different letters are significantly different (P<0.01). FW, fresh weight. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 9.qRT-PCR analysis of secondary cell wall biosynthesis genes in the WT and transgenic lines L4 and L14. Total RNA was isolated from the stem xylem tissues of 3-month-old plants grown in a greenhouse. Expression of both cellulose biosynthesis (PtCesA4, PtCesA7, PtCesA8, PtCesA17, and PtCesA18) and lignin biosynthesis (PtrC4H2, PtrCCoAOMT1, and PtrCOMT2) genes was analysed. The experiment was performed three times using different batches of plants. Error bars represent the SD of three technical replicates using pooled samples of three independent plants. The expression level of genes in the WT was set to 1. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)