Literature DB >> 25427625

Emulsion electrospinning of polycaprolactone: influence of surfactant type towards the scaffold properties.

Jue Hu1, Molamma P Prabhakaran, Xin Ding, Seeram Ramakrishna.   

Abstract

Producing uniform nanofibers in high quality by electrospinning remains a huge challenge, especially using low concentrated polymer solutions. However, emulsion electrospinning assists to produce nanofibers from less concentrated polymer solutions compared to the traditional electrospinning process. The influence of individual surfactants towards the morphology of the emulsion electrospun poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/bovine serum albumin (PCL/BSA) nanofibers were investigated by using (i) non-ionic surfactant sorbitane monooleate (Span80); (ii) anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); and (iii) cationic benzyltriethylammonium chloride, and poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer Pluronic F108 of different concentrations. The morphology, along with the chemical and mechanical properties of the fibers, was evaluated by field emission scanning electron microscopy, attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, water contact angle, and tensile tester. With the addition of surfactants, the electrospinnability of dilute PCL solution was enhanced, with either branched or uniform fibers were obtained. Electrospinning of an emulsion containing 0.4% (w/v) SDS produced the smallest and the most uniform nanofibers (167 ± 39 nm), which was attributed to the high conductivity of the solution. Analysis revealed that the emulsion electrospun nanofibers containing different surfactants and surfactant concentrations differ in fiber morphology and mechanical properties. Results suggest that surfactants have the ability to modulate the fiber morphology via electrostatic and hydrogen bonding, depending on their chemical structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bovine serum albumin; conductivity; emulsion; nanofibers; surfactant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25427625     DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2014.982241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  9 in total

Review 1.  In pursuit of functional electrospun materials for clinical applications in humans.

Authors:  Ryan J Stoddard; Arielle L Steger; Anna K Blakney; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2016-06-02

2.  Effect of Ionic and Non-Ionic Surfactant on Bovine Serum Albumin Encapsulation and Biological Properties of Emulsion-Electrospun Fibers.

Authors:  Roksana Kurpanik; Agnieszka Lechowska-Liszka; Joanna Mastalska-Popławska; Marek Nocuń; Alicja Rapacz-Kmita; Anna Ścisłowska-Czarnecka; Ewa Stodolak-Zych
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  Biohybrid Electrospun Membrane for the Filtration of Ketoprofen Drug from Water.

Authors:  Rossella Castagna; Stefano Donini; Paolo Colnago; Andrea Serafini; Emilio Parisini; Chiara Bertarelli
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-08-06

4.  Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun Double-layered Nanocomposites Membranes as a Carrier for Centella asiatica (L.).

Authors:  Cláudia Mouro; Raul Fangueiro; Isabel C Gouveia
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 5.  Electrospun nanofibers: A nanotechnological approach for drug delivery and dissolution optimization in poorly water-soluble drugs.

Authors:  Luis Castillo-Henríquez; Rolando Vargas-Zúñiga; Jorge Pacheco-Molina; Jose Vega-Baudrit
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2020-07-05

6.  Formation and characterization of polytetrafluoroethylene nanofiber membranes for high-efficiency fine particulate filtration.

Authors:  Huan Xu; Wangyong Jin; Feng Wang; Guojin Liu; Chengcai Li; Jieqi Wang; Hailin Zhu; Yuhai Guo
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Surfactant location and internal phase volume fraction dictate emulsion electrospun fiber morphology and modulate drug release and cell response.

Authors:  Pamela M Johnson; Kelsey E Knewtson; Jacob G Hodge; Justin M Lehtinen; Anna S Trofimoff; D Joseph Fritz; Jennifer L Robinson
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 8.  Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)-Based Nanofibrous Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Marta A Teixeira; M Teresa P Amorim; Helena P Felgueiras
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  A tailored polylactic acid/polycaprolactone biodegradable and bioactive 3D porous scaffold containing gelatin nanofibers and Taurine for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Hadi Samadian; Saeed Farzamfar; Ahmad Vaez; Arian Ehterami; Arindam Bit; Mostafa Alam; Arash Goodarzi; Gholamhossein Darya; Majid Salehi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.