Literature DB >> 2542761

Partial antagonism of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-mediated induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase by 6-methyl-1,3,8-trichlorodibenzofuran: mechanistic studies.

M Harris1, T Zacharewski, B Astroff, S Safe.   

Abstract

6-Methyl-1,3,8-trichlorodibenzofuran (MCDF) binds with moderate affinity to the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor protein (4.9 x 10(-8) M) but is a weak Ah receptor agonist. Cotreatment of male Long Evans rats with MCDF (50 mumol/kg) and a dose of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) that causes a near-maximal induction of hepatic microsomal aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase and ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase activities resulted in a significant inhibition of these activities for up to 96 hr. Comparable results were obtained with MCDF (10(-7) M) and TCDD (10(-8) M) in rat hepatoma H-4-II E cells in culture over 36 hr. TCDD treatment of rats resulted in an initial decrease of hepatic cytosolic Ah receptor within 6 hr and this was followed by a subsequent 138% increase in cytosolic receptor levels 72 hr after treatment. Although MCDF (50 mumol/kg) did not significantly alter rat hepatic cytosolic Ah receptor levels in animals cotreated with TCDD plus MCDF, the latter compound significantly inhibited TCDD-mediated replenishment of the cytosolic Ah receptor. In contrast, treatment of rat hepatoma H-4-II E cells with TCDD (10(-8) M) resulted in the rapid (within 1 hr) depletion of cytosolic Ah receptor, which remained undetectable for up to 36 hr; cotreatment of the cells with MCDF (10(-7) M) and TCDD (10(-8) M) resulted in cytosolic Ah receptor levels that were similar to those observed after treatment with TCDD alone. The effects of MCDF on the uptake and persistence of nuclear [3H]TCDD-Ah receptor complex levels were also determined in rat liver and rat hepatoma H-4-II E cells in culture. MCDF did not significantly decrease levels of occupied nuclear Ah receptor complexes in the rat or rat hepatoma cells. Moreover, using the sucrose density gradient assay procedure, the sedimentation coefficients of the cytosolic and nuclear TCDD-Ah receptor complexes in the presence or absence of MCDF were comparable. The results of these and other related studies with 6-substituted-1,3,8-trichlorodibenzofurans suggest that MCDF may act as a partial TCDD antagonist by competing with TCDD for nuclear binding sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2542761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  9 in total

1.  Comparisons of differential gene expression elicited by TCDD, PCB126, βNF, or ICZ in mouse hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells and C57BL/6 mouse liver.

Authors:  Rance Nault; Agnes L Forgacs; Edward Dere; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Dopamine is an aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist.

Authors:  Hyejin Park; Un-Ho Jin; Keshav Karki; Arul Jayaraman; Clint Allred; Sharon K Michelhaugh; Sandeep Mittal; Robert S Chapkin; Stephen Safe
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists induce microRNA-335 expression and inhibit lung metastasis of estrogen receptor negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; KyoungHyun Kim; Un Ho Jin; Catherine Pfent; Huojun Cao; Brad Amendt; Xinyi Liu; Heather Wilson-Robles; Stephen Safe
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-active pharmaceuticals are selective AHR modulators in MDA-MB-468 and BT474 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Un-Ho Jin; Syng-ook Lee; Stephen Safe
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a target for estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; Ping Lei; Xinyi Liu; Xiangrong Li; Kelcey Walker; Leela Kotha; Craig Rowlands; Stephen Safe
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 6.  Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in carcinogenesis and potential as a drug target.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Syng-Ook Lee; Un-Ho Jin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Antagonism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling by 6,2',4'-trimethoxyflavone.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Colin A Flaveny; Brett C DiNatale; Chris R Chairo; Jennifer C Schroeder; Ann Kusnadi; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 8.  The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Energy Balance: The Road from Dioxin-Induced Wasting Syndrome to Combating Obesity with Ahr Ligands.

Authors:  Nathaniel G Girer; Craig R Tomlinson; Cornelis J Elferink
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand omeprazole inhibits breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis.

Authors:  Un-Ho Jin; Syng-Ook Lee; Catherine Pfent; Stephen Safe
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.