Literature DB >> 25427579

Receptor expression discrepancy between primary and metastatic breast cancer lesions.

Düriye S Karagöz Özen1, Mehmet A Ozturk, Övgü Aydin, Zeynep H Turna, Sennur Ilvan, Mustafa Özgüroglu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the expression status of hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer may change during disease progression. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression status in primary breast cancer and metastatic lesions.
METHODS: 58 patients with registered biopsy reports or available samples of the primary tumor and distant metastases were included in the final analysis. Biopsy samples were re-stained using immunohistochemical methods to determine receptor status (if not already recorded in previous reports) and re-examined by 2 independent pathologists.
RESULTS: Discordance rates for receptor expression status of the primary tumor and distant metastases for ER, PR, and HER2 were 17.4, 45.4, and 13.3%, respectively. No statistically significant difference in overall survival due to receptor expression discordance between the primary tumor and metastatic sites (p>0.05) was found, although a tendency toward worse survival time was observed in patients with HER2 expression discrepancies.
CONCLUSION: This study showed receptor discordance rates between primary and metastatic breast cancer sites for ER, PR, and HER2 of 17.8, 45.4, and 13.3%, respectively. Re-biopsy and IHC evaluation of metastatic sites for receptor status may change treatment decisions in patients with relapsed/progressed BC.
© 2014 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25427579     DOI: 10.1159/000368312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Res Treat        ISSN: 2296-5270            Impact factor:   2.825


  6 in total

1.  Fluorine-18 Labeling of the HER2-Targeting Single-Domain Antibody 2Rs15d Using a Residualizing Label and Preclinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Zhengyuan Zhou; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Darryl McDougald; Choong Mo Kang; Irina Balyasnikova; Nick Devoogdt; Angeline N Ta; Brian R McNaughton; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Clinical Potential of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Lanell M Peterson; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

3.  Discordance of the estrogen receptor and HER-2/neu in breast cancer from primary lesion to first and second metastatic site.

Authors:  Elyse E Lower; Shagufta Khan; Diane Kennedy; Robert P Baughman
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-08-02

4.  Biopsy of breast cancer metastases: patient characteristics and survival.

Authors:  Shlomit Strulov Shachar; Tanya Mashiach; Georgeta Fried; Karen Drumea; Noa Shafran; Hyman B Muss; Gil Bar-Sela
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Programmed death-ligand 1 expression discrepancy between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Waleed Kian; Laila C Roisman; Nadav Wallach; Dina Levitas; Alexander Yakobson; Yulia Dudnik; Nir Peled; Keren Rouvinov
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Metastatic Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer: Companion and Theranostic Approach in Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Christopher Montemagno; Gilles Pagès
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.