Literature DB >> 25427530

[Growth behavior after fractures of the distal forearm: reasons for the high rate of overtreatment].

J Lieber1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The distal forearm fracture is the most common injury (40%) in pediatric traumatology.
OBJECTIVES: The treatment of distal forearm fractures in the growth phase contains two contrasting phenomena which are incompatible with the patient's interests and are discussed in this article.
METHODS: A selective literature search was carried out and selected cases are discussed.
RESULTS: On the one hand there is a unique property of the juvenile skeleton with an enormous potential for spontaneous correction enabling conservative treatment for the majority of fractures. This generally leads to healing without functional or cosmetic defects, even in cases of some minor residual angulations. In contrast, high rates of overtreatment are observed, such as unnecessary or repetitive reductions and operative interventions, which are not only the result of ignorance of the growth prognosis and of correct conservative techniques but also of economic factors as a consequence of medical economization as well as positive experiences gained in adults but which cannot be transferred to children. The management of distal forearm fractures should be reserved for unstable fracture types especially in adolescent patients with limited age-dependent potential for spontaneous correction. Angulated fractures should be treated using cast wedging in order to reduce angulation to a reasonable extent. The most frequently occurring stable torus fractures require immobilization only for analgesic reasons. Intolerable angulations as well as completely dislocated fractures are treated by closed reduction and stabilized with a Kirschner wire osteosynthesis depending on age.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of distal forearm fractures should be appropriate for children as well as highly efficient, by using a minimal amount of effort. Current forms of overtreatment have to be avoided because of moral and in particular economic reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25427530     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-014-2633-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  15 in total

1.  Reduction versus remodeling in pediatric distal forearm fractures: a preliminary cost analysis.

Authors:  Twee T Do; William M Strub; Susan L Foad; Charles T Mehlman; Alvin H Crawford
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Acceptance of angulation in the non-operative treatment of paediatric forearm fractures.

Authors:  Joris J W Ploegmakers; Cees C P M Verheyen
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Above- or below-elbow casts for distal third forearm fractures in children? A meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Roel P M Hendrickx; Martin M Campo; Arno P W van Lieshout; Peter A A Struijs; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Principles of fracture remodeling in children.

Authors:  Kaye E Wilkins
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Management of completely displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius in children. A prospective, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  G J McLauchlan; B Cowan; I H Annan; J E Robb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

6.  [Post-traumatic growth disorders and corrective measures on the growing skeleton].

Authors:  L R von Laer
Journal:  Fortschr Med       Date:  1984-03-08

7.  Risk factors associated with loss of position after closed reduction of distal radial fractures in children.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Hang; Anastasia F Hutchinson; Raphael C Hau
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  [Late sequelae of fractures of the distal third of the forearm during the growth period].

Authors:  R Zimmermann; M Gabl; P Angermann; M Lutz; C Reinhart; F Kralinger; S Pechlaner
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.018

9.  Longitudinal growth after nonphyseal forearm fractures.

Authors:  Belen Carsi; Juan C Abril; Tomas Epeldegui
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Remodeling of Salter-Harris type II epiphyseal plate injury of the distal radius.

Authors:  Shirzad Houshian; Anette Koch Holst; Morten S Larsen; Trine Torfing
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Fractures of the upper limbs in childhood and adolescence].

Authors:  P P Schmittenbecher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The Association Between Concomitant Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Brandon Shulman; Jonathan Bekisz; Christopher Lopez; Samantha Maliha; Siddharth Mahure; Jacques Hacquebord
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  Fractures of the proximal radius in children: management and results of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Markus Dietzel; Simon Scherer; Michael Esser; Hans-Joachim Kirschner; Jörg Fuchs; Justus Lieber
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.928

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.