Richard S Cooper1, Terrence E Forrester, Jacob Plange-Rhule, Pascal Bovet, Estelle V Lambert, Lara R Dugas, Kathryn E Cargill, Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu, David A Shoham, Liping Tong, Guichan Cao, Amy Luke. 1. aDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA bSolutions for Developing Countries, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica cKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana dInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland & Ministry of Health, Republic of Seychelles eResearch Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Blood pressures in persons of African descent exceed those of other racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Whether this trait is attributable to the genetic factors in African-origin populations, or a result of inadequately measured environmental exposures, such as racial discrimination, is not known. To study this question, we conducted a multisite comparative study of communities in the African diaspora, drawn from metropolitan Chicago, Kingston, Jamaica, rural Ghana, Cape Town, South Africa, and the Seychelles. METHODS: At each site, 500 participants between the age of 25 and 49 years, with approximately equal sex balance, were enrolled for a longitudinal study of energy expenditure and weight gain. In this study, we describe the patterns of blood pressure and hypertension observed at baseline among the sites. RESULTS: Mean SBP and DBP were very similar in the United States and South Africa in both men and women, although among women, the prevalence of hypertension was higher in the United States (24 vs. 17%, respectively). After adjustment for multiple covariates, relative to participants in the United States, SBP was significantly higher among the South Africans by 9.7 mmHg (P < 0.05) and significantly lower for each of the other sites: for example, Jamaica: -7.9 mmHg (P = 0.06), Ghana: -12.8 mmHg (P < 0.01) and Seychelles: -11.1 mmHg (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with prior findings of a blood pressure gradient in societies of the African diaspora and confirm that African-origin populations with lower social status in multiracial societies, such as the United States and South Africa, experience more hypertension than anticipated based on anthropometric and measurable socioeconomic risk factors.
OBJECTIVES: Blood pressures in persons of African descent exceed those of other racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Whether this trait is attributable to the genetic factors in African-origin populations, or a result of inadequately measured environmental exposures, such as racial discrimination, is not known. To study this question, we conducted a multisite comparative study of communities in the African diaspora, drawn from metropolitan Chicago, Kingston, Jamaica, rural Ghana, Cape Town, South Africa, and the Seychelles. METHODS: At each site, 500 participants between the age of 25 and 49 years, with approximately equal sex balance, were enrolled for a longitudinal study of energy expenditure and weight gain. In this study, we describe the patterns of blood pressure and hypertension observed at baseline among the sites. RESULTS: Mean SBP and DBP were very similar in the United States and South Africa in both men and women, although among women, the prevalence of hypertension was higher in the United States (24 vs. 17%, respectively). After adjustment for multiple covariates, relative to participants in the United States, SBP was significantly higher among the South Africans by 9.7 mmHg (P < 0.05) and significantly lower for each of the other sites: for example, Jamaica: -7.9 mmHg (P = 0.06), Ghana: -12.8 mmHg (P < 0.01) and Seychelles: -11.1 mmHg (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with prior findings of a blood pressure gradient in societies of the African diaspora and confirm that African-origin populations with lower social status in multiracial societies, such as the United States and South Africa, experience more hypertension than anticipated based on anthropometric and measurable socioeconomic risk factors.
Authors: A Luke; H Kramer; A Adeyemo; T Forrester; R Wilks; D Schoeller; C Leman; R S Cooper Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: R Cooper; C Rotimi; S Ataman; D McGee; B Osotimehin; S Kadiri; W Muna; S Kingue; H Fraser; T Forrester; F Bennett; R Wilks Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Krisela Steyn; Naomi S Levitt; Margaret Hoffman; A David Marais; Jean M Fourie; Estelle V Lambert; Thomas A Gaziano; Lulama Kepe; Carl J Lombard Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: L J Appel; T J Moore; E Obarzanek; W M Vollmer; L P Svetkey; F M Sacks; G A Bray; T M Vogt; J A Cutler; M M Windhauser; P H Lin; N Karanja Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A E Schutte; S Botha; C M T Fourie; L F Gafane-Matemane; R Kruger; L Lammertyn; L Malan; C M C Mels; R Schutte; W Smith; J M van Rooyen; L J Ware; H W Huisman Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Paul K Whelton; Paula T Einhorn; Paul Muntner; Lawrence J Appel; William C Cushman; Ana V Diez Roux; Keith C Ferdinand; Mahboob Rahman; Herman A Taylor; Jamy Ard; Donna K Arnett; Barry L Carter; Barry R Davis; Barry I Freedman; Lisa A Cooper; Richard Cooper; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Nara Gavini; Alan S Go; David J Hyman; Paul L Kimmel; Karen L Margolis; Edgar R Miller; Katherine T Mills; George A Mensah; Ann M Navar; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Michael K Rakotz; George Thomas; Jonathan N Tobin; Jackson T Wright; Sung Sug Sarah Yoon; Jeffrey A Cutler Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Abiodun M Adeoye; Bamidele O Tayo; Mayowa O Owolabi; Adewole A Adebiyi; Daniel T Lackland; Richard Cooper; Akinlolu Ojo; Gbenga Ogedegbe Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Melis Sahinoz; Fernando Elijovich; Lale A Ertuglu; Jeanne Ishimwe; Ashley Pitzer; Mohammad Saleem; Naome Mwesigwa; Thomas R Kleyman; Cheryl L Laffer; Annet Kirabo Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Nuri Kodaman; Melinda C Aldrich; Rafal Sobota; Folkert W Asselbergs; Kwabena A Poku; Nancy J Brown; Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lara R Dugas; Terrence E Forrester; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Pascal Bovet; Estelle V Lambert; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Guichan Cao; Richard S Cooper; Rasha Khatib; Laura Tonino; Walter Riesen; Wolfgang Korte; Stephanie Kliethermes; Amy Luke Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Greer A Burkholder; Ashutosh R Tamhane; Monika M Safford; Paul M Muntner; Amanda L Willig; James H Willig; James L Raper; Michael S Saag; Michael J Mugavero Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Trevor S Ferguson; Novie O M Younger-Coleman; Marshall K Tulloch-Reid; Nadia R Bennett; Amanda E Rousseau; Jennifer M Knight-Madden; Maureen E Samms-Vaughan; Deanna E Ashley; Rainford J Wilks Journal: PeerJ Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Alana T Brennan; Lise Jamieson; Nigel J Crowther; Matthew P Fox; Jaya A George; Kaitlyn M Berry; Andrew Stokes; Mhairi Maskew; Ian Sanne; Lawrence Long; Naseem Cassim; Sydney Rosen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240