| Literature DB >> 25426471 |
Abstract
This study aims to verify the mediation effect of recovery resilience according to the relation between Senior Citizen Community Center (SCCC) elderly users' participation in exercise rehabilitation programs and their successful aging. Toward that end, 400 65-yr or older participants and non-participants in SCCCs' exercise rehabilitation programs, living in Incheon, were sampled. Of their answered questionnaires, 35 copies which were deemed low-reliability, duplicated, and inadequately specified were excluded from the analysis. And, the other data were coded through computers, and underwent a descriptive statistical analysis (DSA) and a standard multiple regression analysis (SMRA) using Windows SPSS/PC+21.0 Version statistical program. Thus it was firstly found that elderly people's participation or non-participation in exercise rehabilitation programs partially influenced their recovery resilience and successful aging. The participants group, compared with the non-participants group, had greater recovery resilience and experienced successful aging. Second, the relation between the degree of participation in exercise rehabilitation programs, recovery resilience and successful aging revealed that the longer and the more frequent the participation in exercise rehabilitation programs was, the greater the recovery resilience was and the more successful aging was. Third, the verification of the mediation effect of recovery resilience in the relation between the program participation degree and the successful aging revealed that, compared with those of the model of direct effects of independent variables and dependent variables, the recovery resilience-mediated model's verification power and explanation power were greater.Entities:
Keywords: Rehabilitation Exercise participation; Resilience; Successful aging
Year: 2014 PMID: 25426471 PMCID: PMC4237849 DOI: 10.12965/jer.140164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Rehabil ISSN: 2288-176X
T-test for elderly people’s recovery resilience difference according to their participation and non-participation in exercise rehabilitation programs
| Recovery resilience | n | Emotion control power | Impulsion control power | Optimism | Cause analysis ability | Empathy ability | Self-efficacy | Positive challenging spirit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Participation type | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |
| Participation | 186 | 3.88 | 0.52 | 3.64 | 0.45 | 4.22 | 0.56 | 3.78 | 0.77 | 3.88 | 0.55 | 4.10 | 0.61 | 3.99 | 0.55 |
| Non-participation | 179 | 3.14 | 0.68 | 3.21 | 0.54 | 3.84 | 0.87 | 3.60 | 0.78 | 3.67 | 0.61 | 3.60 | 0.68 | 3.42 | 0.62 |
| t value | 5.251 | 2.514 | 3.209 | 1.548 | 1.023 | 3.854 | 3.966 | ||||||||
P< 0.05,
P< 0.01,
P< 0.001.
T-test for elderly people’s successful aging difference according to their participation and non-participation in exercise rehabilitation programs
| Successful aging | n | Autonomous life | Self-achievement orientation | Positive participation in life | Satisfaction with children | Self-acceptance | Acceptance of others | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Participation type | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |
| Participation | 186 | 3.75 | 0.56 | 3.68 | 0.66 | 3.89 | 0.41 | 3.36 | .52 | 3.78 | 0.62 | 3.98 | 0.58 |
| Non-participation | 179 | 3.69 | 0.62 | 3.45 | 0.74 | 3.30 | 0.62 | 3.10 | .58 | 3.32 | 0.82 | 3.33 | 0.62 |
| t value | 0.457 | 1.102 | 2.874 | 1.011 | 2.621 | 4.102 | |||||||
P< 0.05,
P< 0.01,
P< 0.001.
Multiple regression analysis of the relation between the degree of elderly people’s participation in exercise rehabilitation programs and their recovery resilience
| Recovery resilience | Emotion control power | Impulsion control power | Optimism | Cause analysis ability | Empathy ability | Self-efficacy | Positive challenging spirit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Degree of participation | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t |
| Participation frequency | 0.210 | 3.312** | 0.359 | 7.323 | 0.471 | 8.918 | 0.178 | 2.035 | 0.191 | 2.428** | 0.283 | 3.507 | 0.231 | 2.941 |
| Participation period | 0.198 | 2.122 | 0.211 | 2.958** | 0.273 | 4.303 | 0.023 | 0.510 | 0.004 | 0.080 | 0.252 | 2.458** | 0.047 | 0.090 |
| Participation strength | 0.042 | 1.046 | 0.089 | 0.987 | 0.073 | 1.253 | 0.148 | 1.641 | 0.176 | 2.254 | 0.042 | 0.682 | 0.140 | 1.625 |
| R2 | 0.119 | 0.271 | 0.162 | 0.220 | 0.178 | 0.181 | 0.129 | |||||||
P< 0.05,
P< 0.001.
Multiple regression analysis of the degree of elderly people’s participation in exercise rehabilitation programs and their successful aging
| Successful aging | Autonomous life | Self-achievement orientation | Positive participation in life | Satisfaction with children | Self-acceptance | Acceptance of others | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Degree of participation | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t |
| Participation frequency | 0.211 | 3.496 | 0.234 | 4.283 | 0.212 | 4.238 | 0.261 | 4.550 | 0.280 | 3.123 | 0.310 | 4.063 |
| Participation period | 0.181 | 2.462 | 0.081 | 0.976 | 0.041 | 0.679 | 0.071 | 1.211 | 0.072 | 0.912 | 0.069 | 0.834 |
| Participation strength | 0.059 | 1.095 | 0.182 | 2.194 | 0.032 | 0.432 | 0.078 | 1.343 | 0.241 | 2.242 | 0.112 | 1.562 |
| R2 | 0.192 | 0.220 | 0.182 | 0.299 | 0.310 | 0.117 | ||||||
P< 0.05,
P< 0.01,
P< 0.001.
Mediation effect of recovery resilience with regard to the effects of exercise rehabilitation programs for elderly people on successful aging
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| (the degree of participation in exercise rehabilitation programs → successful aging) | (the degree of participation in exercise rehabilitation programs → recovery resilience) | (the degree of participation in exercise rehabilitation programs, recovery resilience, successful aging) | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| β | β | β | ||||
| Gender | 0.272 | 0.000 | 0.198 | 0.009 | 0.211 | 0.009 |
| Age | 0.055 | 0.074 | 0.288 | 0.000 | 0.234 | 0.000 |
| Education | 0.034 | 0.199 | 0.098 | 0.087 | 0.102 | 0.072 |
| Average monthly available income | 0.348 | 0.000 | 0.064 | 0.256 | 0.220 | 0.030 |
| Health | 0.251 | 0.000 | 0.199 | 0.032 | 0.213 | 0.008 |
| Recovery resilience (R) | 0.362 | 0.000 | 0.259 | 0.018 | 0.221 | 0.005 |
| The degree of participation in exercise rehabilitation programs (P) | 0.340 | 0.000 | ||||
| Successful aging (S) | ||||||
| R2 = 0.398 | R2 = 0.112 | R2 = 0.535 | ||||
| adjusted R2 = 0.382 | adjusted R2 = 0.107 | adjusted R2= 0.512 | ||||
| F = 174.526 | ||||||
| F = 38.852 | F = 15.014 | Model 1→model 3 | ||||
| R2 variance= 0.137 | ||||||
P< 0.001.