Literature DB >> 25425956

Requirements of New Vaccines against Novel Influenza Viruses.

Osamu Kobayashi1.   

Abstract

The currently available influenza vaccines were developed in the 1930s through the 1960s using technologies that were state-of-the art for the times. Decades of advancement in virology and immunology have provided the tools for making better vaccines against influenza virus. Among young children, live attenuated vaccine had significantly better efficacy than inactivated vaccine. An evaluation of the risks and benefits indicates that live attenuated vaccine should be a highly effective, safe vaccine for children 12 to 59 months of age who do not have a history of asthma or wheezing. Otherwise, MF59 adjuvanted influenza vaccine, ATIV was well tolerated in healthy young children and elderly after each of 3 doses and induced greater, longer-lasting, and broader immune responses than a nonadjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, TIV. The enhanced immunogenicity of the adjuvanted vaccine was most evident in very young children and for the B vaccine strain. In case of AS03 ATIV, the safety signal of increased narcolepsy diagnoses following the start of the pandemic vaccination campaign as observed in Sweden and Finland could be observed with this approach. An increase in narcolepsy diagnoses was not observed in other countries, where vaccination coverage was low in the affected age group, or did not follow influenza. A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination. Patient level analyses in these countries are being conducted to verify the signal in more detail. In conclusion, current improved influenza vaccines are; in the problem target groups are children aged 6-24 months and people over 65 years old of age. Only ATIV has shown significantly greater efficacy than TIV, and its safe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant; influenza; safety; vaccine

Year:  2014        PMID: 25425956      PMCID: PMC4204054          DOI: 10.2149/tmh.2014-S12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Med Health        ISSN: 1348-8945


  5 in total

Review 1.  New technologies for new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Alan Shaw
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  The comparative effectiveness of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in the elderly.

Authors:  P G Van Buynder; S Konrad; J L Van Buynder; E Brodkin; M Krajden; G Ramler; M Bigham
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Enhanced immunogenicity of seasonal influenza vaccines in young children using MF59 adjuvant.

Authors:  Timo Vesikari; Michele Pellegrini; Aino Karvonen; Nicola Groth; Astrid Borkowski; Derek T O'Hagan; Audino Podda
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine in infants and young children.

Authors:  Robert B Belshe; Kathryn M Edwards; Timo Vesikari; Steven V Black; Robert E Walker; Micki Hultquist; George Kemble; Edward M Connor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The incidence of narcolepsy in Europe: before, during, and after the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic and vaccination campaigns.

Authors:  Leonoor Wijnans; Coralie Lecomte; Corinne de Vries; Daniel Weibel; Cormac Sammon; Anders Hviid; Henrik Svanström; Ditte Mølgaard-Nielsen; Harald Heijbel; Lisen Arnheim Dahlström; Jonas Hallgren; Par Sparen; Poul Jennum; Mees Mosseveld; Martijn Schuemie; Nicoline van der Maas; Markku Partinen; Silvana Romio; Francesco Trotta; Carmela Santuccio; Angelo Menna; Giuseppe Plazzi; Keivan Kaveh Moghadam; Salvatore Ferro; Gert Jan Lammers; Sebastiaan Overeem; Kari Johansen; Piotr Kramarz; Jan Bonhoeffer; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.641

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.