Literature DB >> 25425596

A systematic review of studies identifying predictors of poor return to work outcomes following workplace injury.

Tamara D Street1, Sarah J Lacey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Injuries occurring in the workplace can have serious implications for the health of the individual, the productivity of the employer and the overall economic community.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to increase the current state of understanding of individual demographic and psychosocial characteristics associated with extended absenteeism from the workforce due to a workplace injury.
METHODS: Studies included in this systematic literature review tracked participants' return to work status over a minimum of three months, identified either demographic, psychosocial or general injury predictors of poor return to work outcomes and included a heterogeneous sample of workplace injuries.
RESULTS: Identified predictors of poor return to work outcomes included older age, female gender, divorced marital status, two or more dependent family members, lower education levels, employment variables associated with reduced labour market desirability, severity or sensitive injury locations, negative attitudes and outcome perceptions of the participant.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for clear and consistent definition and measurement of return to work outcomes and a holistic theoretical model integrating injury, psychosocial and demographic predictors of return to work. Through greater understanding of the nature of factors affecting return to work, improved outcomes could be achieved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Systematic review; injury outcome; occupational rehabilitation; predictors of return to work; return to work; workplace injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25425596     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-141980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  9 in total

1.  Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF.

Authors:  M K Nicholas; D S J Costa; S J Linton; C J Main; W S Shaw; R Pearce; M Gleeson; R Z Pinto; F M Blyth; J H McCauley; C G Maher; R J E M Smeets; A McGarity
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-06

2.  A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Return-to-Work Coordinators in Getting Injured Workers Back on the Job.

Authors:  Tyler J Lane; Rebbecca Lilley; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Anthony D LaMontagne; Malcolm R Sim; Peter M Smith
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-06

3.  The Characteristics of Accepted Work-related Injuries and Diseases Claims in the Australian Coal Mining Industry.

Authors:  Heng T Chong; Alex Collie
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2022-01-07

4.  Patterns and predictors of sick leave after Covid-19 and long Covid in a national Swedish cohort.

Authors:  Emma Westerlind; Annie Palstam; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Hanna C Persson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Work-Related Factors Considered by Sickness-Absent Employees When Estimating Timeframes for Returning to Work.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; YoonSun Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-Term Effects of Psychological Symptoms after Occupational Injury on Return to Work: A 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Po-Ching Chu; Wei-Shan Chin; Yue Leon Guo; Judith Shu-Chu Shiao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Return to employment for working-aged adults after burn injury: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Akane Katsu; Zephanie Tyack; Martin Mackey; James M Elliott; Lynette Mackenzie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Qualitative study of barriers and facilitators encountered by individuals with physical diseases in returning and continuing to work.

Authors:  Shunsuke Inoue; Seiichiro Tateishi; Arisa Harada; Yasushi Oginosawa; Haruhiko Abe; Satoru Saeki; Junichi Tsukada; Koji Mori
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.908

9.  Who are less likely to return to work after getting injured on duty? A 12-month epidemiological evaluation in an orthopedic and traumatology center in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Daniel Wai-Yip Wong; Anthony Wai-Leung Kwok; Yiu-Chung Wong
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.708

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.