Literature DB >> 25425489

CT and MRI assessment of symptomatic organized pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic duct disruption: an interreader variability study using the revised Atlanta classification 2012.

Ayesha Kamal1, Vikesh K Singh, Venkata S Akshintala, Satomi Kawamoto, Salina Tsai, Maera Haider, Elliot K Fishman, Ihab R Kamel, Atif Zaheer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Compare CT and MRI for fluid/debris component estimate and pancreatic duct (PD) communication with organized pancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis. Evaluate fat density globules on CT as marker for debris.
METHODS: 29 Patients with 46 collections with CECT and MRI performed ≥4 weeks of symptom onset assessed for necrotizing pancreatitis, estimated percentage of fluid volume and PD involvement by two radiologists on separate occasions. T2WI used as standard for estimated percentage of fluid volume. Presence of fat globules and fluid attenuation on CT was recorded. Spearman rank correlation and kappa statistics were used to assess the correlation between imaging techniques and interreader agreement, respectively.
RESULTS: Necrotizing pancreatitis seen on CT in 27 (93%, κ 0.119) vs. 20 (69%, κ 0.748) patients on MRI. CT identified 42 WON and 4 pseudocysts vs. 34 WON, and 12 pseudocysts on MRI. Higher interreader agreement for percentage fluid volume on MRI (κ = 0.55) vs. CT (κ = 0.196). Accuracy of CT in evaluation of percentage fluid volume was 65% using T2WI MRI used as standard. Fat globules identified on CT in 13(65%) out of 20 collections containing <75% fluid vs. 4(15%) out of 26 collections containing >75% fluid (p = 0.0001). PD involvement confidently excluded on CT in 68% collections vs. 93% on MRI.
CONCLUSION: MRI demonstrates higher reproducibility for fluid to debris component estimation. Fat globules on CT were frequently seen in organized pancreatic fluid collections with large amount of debris. PD disruption more confidently excluded on MRI. This information may be helpful for pre-procedure planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25425489     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0303-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  10 in total

1.  Revised Atlanta classification for CT pancreatic and peripancreatic collections in the first month of acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement.

Authors:  Neesmah Badat; Ingrid Millet; Lucie Corno; Wassef Khaled; Isabelle Boulay-Coletta; Marc Zins
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Review of management options for pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Christos Agalianos; Ioannis Passas; Ioannis Sideris; Demetrios Davides; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-03-21

Review 3.  Endoscopic Management of Complications in Chronic Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ahmed Dirweesh; Guru Trikudanathan; Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Endoscopic Retroperitoneal Necrosectomy for Infected Pancreatic Necrosis Using a Self-Expandable Metal Stent.

Authors:  Gaurav Patil; Amit Maydeo; Ankit Dalal; Arun Iyer; Rajdeep More; Shivaji Thakare
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-22

Review 5.  Pancreatic fluid collections: What is the ideal imaging technique?

Authors:  Narendra Dhaka; Jayanta Samanta; Suman Kochhar; Navin Kalra; Sreekanth Appasani; Manish Manrai; Rakesh Kochhar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Endoscopic Management of Giant Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis With a High Risk of Bleeding.

Authors:  Faysal Alhasan; Gilles Jadd Hoilat; Waddah Malas; Syed K Mahmood; Jaroslav Zivny; Muhammad Alsayid
Journal:  ACG Case Rep J       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 7.  Role of pancreatography in the endoscopic management of encapsulated pancreatic collections - review and new proposed classification.

Authors:  Igor Mendonça Proença; Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Igor Braga Ribeiro; Sergio Eiji Matuguma; Spencer Cheng; Thomas R McCarty; Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior; Paulo Sakai; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Various Modalities Accurate in Diagnosing a Disrupted or Disconnected Pancreatic Duct in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hester C Timmerhuis; Sven M van Dijk; Robert C Verdonk; Thomas L Bollen; Marco J Bruno; Paul Fockens; Jeanin E van Hooft; Rogier P Voermans; Marc G Besselink; Hjalmar C van Santvoort
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  A narrative review of acute pancreatitis and its diagnosis, pathogenetic mechanism, and management.

Authors:  Zhi Zheng; Yi-Xuan Ding; Yuan-Xu Qu; Feng Cao; Fei Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

Review 10.  Reporting of acute pancreatitis by radiologists-time for a systematic change with structured reporting template.

Authors:  Aman Khurana; Leslie W Nelson; Charles B Myers; Fatih Akisik; Brooke R Jeffrey; Frank H Miller; Pardeep Mittal; Desiree Morgan; Koenraad Mortele; Peter Poullos; Dushyant Sahani; Kumar Sandrasegaran; Temel Tirkes; Atif Zaheer; Bhavik N Patel
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.