Literature DB >> 25425240

Getting a Fair Share: Attitudes and Perceptions of Biobank Stakeholders Concerning the Fairness of Sample Sharing.

Flora Colledge, Bernice Elger.   

Abstract

Biobanks are essential tools for furthering a broad range of medical research areas. However, despite the plethora of national and international laws and guidelines which apply to them, the access and sharing policies of biobanks are only sparsely addressed by regulatory bodies. The 'give and take' process of biosample sharing is largely left up to biobank stakeholders themselves to oversee; it is therefore both in stakeholders' power, and in their interest, to ensure that sample accessibility is fair. This is an important step in motivating researchers to collaborate and pool samples, and is crucial to fostering trust in the absence of universally accepted standard practices. To date, little attention has been paid to how fairness considerations affect scientific material sharing, and no empirical research has been carried out to determine the role that fairness plays in collaborative studies. In order to begin to gain understanding in this area, we interviewed 36 biobank stakeholders currently working in Switzerland, focusing on their perceptions of current and optimal fair sharing practices. Our findings reveal that fairness is an important feature of exchange situations for these stakeholders, and that they have well-formed notions about the practical elements of fair sample access, although ideas about the concept of fairness itself are vague. In order to support efforts to network biobanks, attention should be paid to this issue to reassure all involved that they are getting a fair share in their cooperative efforts.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  biobank; collaboration; fairness; sharing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25425240     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  4 in total

1.  Current practices for access, compensation, and prioritization in biobanks. Results from an interview study.

Authors:  Holger Langhof; Hannes Kahrass; Thomas Illig; Roland Jahns; Daniel Strech
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.

Authors:  Mai H Oushy; Rebecca Palacios; Alan E C Holden; Amelie G Ramirez; Kipling J Gallion; Mary A O'Connell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The author who wasn't there? Fairness and attribution in publications following access to population biobanks.

Authors:  Erika Kleiderman; Amy Pack; Pascal Borry; Ma'n Zawati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sharing, reuse, and storage of biosamples among biomedical researchers in Jordan: Practice and concerns.

Authors:  Almuthanna K Alkaraki; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi; Lina M K Al-Ebbini; Zaid Altaany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.