Literature DB >> 25424985

Gouleako and Herbert viruses in pigs, Republic of Korea, 2013.

Hee Chun Chung, Van Giap Nguyen, Dane Goede, Chang Hoon Park, A Reum Kim, Hyoung Joon Moon, Seong Jun Park, Hye Kwon Kim, Bong Kyun Park.   

Abstract

Several viruses in the family Bunyaviridae are pathogenic to animals and cause vector-borne zoonoses. In 2013, investigation of cause of death of 9 pigs on 1 farm in the Republic of Korea found infection with Gouleako and Herbert viruses. Subsequent investigation revealed high prevalence of these viruses among pigs throughout the country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25424985      PMCID: PMC4257827          DOI: 10.3201/eid2012.131742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Several viruses in the family Bunyaviridae, such as severe fever thrombocytopenia syndrome virus, sandfly fever Naples virus, and La Crosse virus, cause vector-borne zoonotic problems (–). Recently, outbreaks of severe disease caused by Rift Valley fever virus and Schmallenberg virus produced abortion storms, resulting in a high mortality rate among newborn lambs and calves (,). Gouleako virus (GOLV) and Herbert virus (HEBV) have been isolated from mosquitoes (Culex spp.) trapped in Côte d'Ivoire (,); however, their infectivity or virulence have not been proven. Investigation of the cause of death of pigs in the Republic of Korea identified GOLV and HEBV infection.

The Study

In March 27, 2013, a piglet, ≈8 weeks of age, on a 150-sow farm in Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea, died after onset of high fever (40°C), wasting, respiratory disease, and diarrhea. The carcass was sent to the Department of Veterinary Medicine Virology Laboratory, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, for diagnostics. Necropsy and microscopic examinations revealed greenish lung tissue with lymphoid depletion, consistent with severe bronchopneumonia. Despite the presence of multiple clinical signs, the results of routine tests for major pathogens in pigs (e.g., porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, porcine circovirus type 2, transmissible gastroenteritis virus, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus spp., and Salmonella spp.) were negative. To further explore cause of the death, we used the particle-associated nucleic acid –random PCR method (Technical Appendix). Sequencing and BLAST analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi) of the agent-specific amplicon simultaneously detected 2 viruses in lung tissue RNA samples. One partial sequence had 100% identity with 63 nt of the GOLV strain F23/CI/2004 glycoprotein gene (GenBank accession no. FJ765411). Another sequence had 97% similarity with 66 nt of the HEBV strain F23-K4 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene (GenBank accession no. EF423168). Results were validated with reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) (Technical Appendix). We obtained partial sequences of 235 nt of GOLV and 324 nt of HEBV. These sequences had 97.1% and 96.9% similarity with GOLV and HEBV, respectively, previously isolated from mosquitoes (,). The sequences were registered as GenBank accession nos. KF361520 and KF361522 and designated as GOLV/P1 and HEBV/P1, respectively. During March–May 2013, we received a total of 9 dead pigs from the same farm; they had displayed various clinical signs. We further screened these pigs for the presence of GOLV and HEBV by using the same primer sets (Technical Appendix) selective for their glycoprotein and RdRp genes, respectively. The results showed that the pigs were infected with GOLV and HEBV at a prevalence of 83.3% and 100%, respectively, mostly in lung samples (Table 1). The sequences obtained from this assay were registered as GenBank accession nos. KF361521 and KF361523 and designated GOLV/P8 and HEBV/P9, respectively.
Table 1

GOLV and HEBV screening results for dead pigs on 1 farm in Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea, 2013*

Pig no.Clinical signsAge group†Month sample collectedSample no.Sample typeGOLV
HEBV
Other pathogens
RT-PCRqRT-PCR, copies/μL‡RT-PCRqRT-PCR, copies/μL‡
1NoneFinisherMarP0LungNA+2.57 × 103
2Wasting, cyanosis, fever, respiratory disorders, diarrheaWeanedMarP1Lung§2.03 × 103+#1.26 × 102NA
P2Intestine+1.27 × 104+1.16 × 102NA
3Diarrhea, respiratory disordersFinisherMarP3Lung+1.11 × 102+1.37 × 103PRRSV, PCV2
P4IntestineNA.
4Diarrhea, respiratory disordersGiltMarP5Lung+2.53 × 103+5.45 × 104PRRSV, PCV2
P6IntestineNANARotavirus, E. coli
5Respiratory disordersWeanedAprP7Lung+2.04 × 103+2.78 × 103PRRSV, PCV2
P8Intestine1.82 × 102NA
6Diarrhea, respiratory disordersGrowerAprP9Lung+5.10 ×1 05+#5.46 × 103PRRSV
P10IntestineNANA
7DiarrheaFinisherMarP11IntestineNANA E. coli
8DiarrheaSowMarP12Intestine+6.52 × 102NARotavirus, E. coli
9NoneFinisherMarP13IntestineNANANA

*E. coli, Escherichia coli; GOLV, Gouleako virus; HEBV, Herbert virus; NA, not applicable; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription PCR; PCV2, porcine circovirus type 2; PRRSV, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Rota, rotavirus.
†Samples were sorted into 6 groups: female (gilt and sow), suckling (<30 d), weaned (30–60 d), grower (60–90 d); and finisher (≥90 d).
‡Amount of virus from qRT-PCR results, copies/μL (online Technical Appendix, http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/20/12/13-1742-Techapp1.pdf).
§First sample in which virus was detected by particle-associated nucleic acid–-random PCR.
¶GenBank, GOLV (P1, KF361520; P8, KF361521).
#GenBank, HEBV (P1, KF361522; P9, KF362523).

*E. coli, Escherichia coli; GOLV, Gouleako virus; HEBV, Herbert virus; NA, not applicable; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription PCR; PCV2, porcine circovirus type 2; PRRSV, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Rota, rotavirus.
†Samples were sorted into 6 groups: female (gilt and sow), suckling (<30 d), weaned (30–60 d), grower (60–90 d); and finisher (≥90 d).
‡Amount of virus from qRT-PCR results, copies/μL (online Technical Appendix, http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/20/12/13-1742-Techapp1.pdf).
§First sample in which virus was detected by particle-associated nucleic acid–-random PCR.
¶GenBank, GOLV (P1, KF361520; P8, KF361521).
#GenBank, HEBV (P1, KF361522; P9, KF362523). Because of the high rate of GOLV positivity, we conducted a histopathologic RNA in situ hybridization study (Technical Appendix). Hybridization signal was positive in lung and lymph node tissues and negative in intestine and control tissues. Hybridization was strong in the cytoplasm of mononuclear cells (deep blue color) (Technical Appendix Figure 1). Using the same RT-PCR method (Technical Appendix), we investigated the prevalence of GOLV and HEBV in other swine populations in the Republic of Korea; we used the existing primer sets: (GOLV-NCF and GOLV-NCR) and (HEBV-F and HEBV-R). During March–September 2013, a total of 461 serum samples were randomly collected from 40 commercial swine farms in 9 provinces. Of these, 204 (44.3%) samples were positive for GOLV and 26 (5.6%) samples were positive for HEBV (Table 2). The rates of positivity for the investigated provinces are shown in Figure 1. When examined according to season, positive samples were more frequently found in the summer than in spring. For example, during July–August, rates were ≈65% (for GOLV) and 10% (for HEBV), but in March, rates for each virus were <10%. Rates for GOLV and HEBV positivity were higher among sows (1–4 years of age) than among pigs in other age groups (Table 2).
Table 2

Pig samples positive for GOLV or HEBV by RT-PCR, Republic of Korea, 2013*

VariableNo. (%) positive
GOLVHEBV
Pig age group
Gilt, n = 4923 (46.9)3 (6.1)
Sow, n = 7642 (55.3)12 (15.8)
Suckling, n = 9020 (22.2)5 (5.6)
Weaned, n = 9044 (48.8)2 (2.2)
Grower, n = 7737 (48.1)3 (3.9)
Finisher, n = 7938 (48.1)1 (1.3)
Total, n = 461204 (44.3)26 (5.6)

*GOLV, Gouleako virus; HEBV, Herbert virus; RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR.

Figure 1

Distribution of swine farms investigated to determine cause of death of pigs, 9 provinces, Republic of Korea, 2013. The locations of farms are indicated, and the numbers and percentages of positive farms are shown in parentheses. Black dot indicates location of first case discovered. GOLV, Gouleako virus; HEBV, Herbert virus.

*GOLV, Gouleako virus; HEBV, Herbert virus; RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR. Distribution of swine farms investigated to determine cause of death of pigs, 9 provinces, Republic of Korea, 2013. The locations of farms are indicated, and the numbers and percentages of positive farms are shown in parentheses. Black dot indicates location of first case discovered. GOLV, Gouleako virus; HEBV, Herbert virus. The study was extended to include sows on other farms in the Republic of Korea because of the major role of sows on a commercial swine farm. Pigs were divided into 3 groups and the following samples were collected: blood from healthy sows >1 year of age (n = 76), blood from abortion-problem sows (n = 13), and tissue from aborted fetuses (n = 42). Rates of virus positivity for GOLV and HEBV were higher for the 42 fetuses (33 [78.6%] and 11 [26.2%]) than for pigs in the healthy group (42 [55.3%] and 12 [15.8%]), respectively. Of the 13 abortion-problem sows, GOLV and HEBV, respectively, were found in 10 (76.9%) and 3 (23%) samples. The rates of GOLV and HEBV positivity among the healthy and abortion groups (abortion-problem sows and fetuses) were statistically compared by using the Pearson χ2 test in SPSS version12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The only significant correlation found was for HEBV infection in the abortion group; p<0.05. Within the abortion group, pooled tissues from the 42 fetuses were screened for other pathogens (Technical Appendix). The highest rate of positivity for the fetuses was for GOLV; 17 (40.5%) of the 42 samples were positive for GOLV only. Concurrent GOLV and HEBV infection was found in 9 (21.4%) samples and GOLV and swine influenza virus in 4 (9.5%) samples; no specific pathogens were detected in 7 (16.7%) samples (Technical Appendix Table). The phylogenetic relationships of GOLV and HEBV isolated from swine in the Republic of Korea (Technical Appendix) with the other members of family Bunyaviridae were analyzed; analyses were based on genes that encode the nucleocapsid protein (for GOLV) and RdRp (for HEBV). Of the GOLVs, the result showed that samples from the swine farms examined (KJ830623, KJ830624) clustered with GOLV strains from Africa () and showed high similarities (98.34%–98.98%) with a strain of GOLV from mosquitoes in western Africa (HQ541736) (Figure 2, panel A). Of the HEBV viruses, samples from swine farms examined (KJ830625, KJ830626) formed a branch with existing strains (KF590583, JQ659256) from mosquitoes in Côte d'Ivoire () (Figure 2, panel B). Similarities with each other were 94.46%–97.23%.
Figure 2

Phylogenetic analyses of Gouleako virus (GOLV) and Herbert virus (HEBV) collected from swine in the Republic of Korea, 2013 (KJ830623–J830626, in boldface), and other family Bunyaviridae viruses. The bootstrap consensus trees were constructed by using the maximum-likelihood method based on the general time-reversible model, implemented in MEGA version 6.06 (http://www.megasoftware.net). The phylogenetic trees for GOLV (A) and HEBV (B) were inferred on the basis of nucleotide sequences of the gene encoding nucleocapsid protein (GOLV) or RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (HEBV). The bootstrap values are shown next to the branches. Bunyaviridae virus sequences from previous studies (,) were used as reference sequences.

Phylogenetic analyses of Gouleako virus (GOLV) and Herbert virus (HEBV) collected from swine in the Republic of Korea, 2013 (KJ830623–J830626, in boldface), and other family Bunyaviridae viruses. The bootstrap consensus trees were constructed by using the maximum-likelihood method based on the general time-reversible model, implemented in MEGA version 6.06 (http://www.megasoftware.net). The phylogenetic trees for GOLV (A) and HEBV (B) were inferred on the basis of nucleotide sequences of the gene encoding nucleocapsid protein (GOLV) or RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (HEBV). The bootstrap values are shown next to the branches. Bunyaviridae virus sequences from previous studies (,) were used as reference sequences. Two field GOLV strains (CP-1/2013 and CP-2/2013) used in this study were isolated from pig kidney (PK15) cells. Detailed information about the methods used to prove the results are shown in Technical Appendix Figure 2.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that GOLV and HEBV are prevalent on swine farms in the Republic of Korea. Prevalence of these viruses was first suspected after particle-associated nucleic acid–random PCR of tissue from dead pigs, and it was proven by RT-PCR screening of a large collection of samples (serum, fetal tissue) from healthy and sick pigs throughout the country. The in situ hybridization method detected GOLV RNA in pig tissues and provided evidence in support of the presence of GOLV in the infected tissues of pigs. The findings of this study indicate that GOLV and HEBV may be associated with disease in pigs; investigation of the pathogenicity of the viruses in pigs, as well as their relation to other emerging viruses of swine, is needed.

Technical Appendix

Methods used to identify Gouleako and Herbert viruses collected from swine in the Republic of Korea, 2013.
  10 in total

1.  Gouleako virus isolated from West African mosquitoes constitutes a proposed novel genus in the family Bunyaviridae.

Authors:  M Marklewitz; S Handrick; W Grasse; A Kurth; A Lukashev; C Drosten; H Ellerbrok; F H Leendertz; G Pauli; S Junglen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Organ distribution of Schmallenberg virus RNA in malformed newborns.

Authors:  S Bilk; C Schulze; M Fischer; M Beer; A Hlinak; B Hoffmann
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Punique virus, a novel phlebovirus, related to sandfly fever Naples virus, isolated from sandflies collected in Tunisia.

Authors:  Elyes Zhioua; Grégory Moureau; Ifhem Chelbi; Laetitia Ninove; Laurence Bichaud; Mohamed Derbali; Mylène Champs; Saifeddine Cherni; Nicolas Salez; Shelley Cook; Xavier de Lamballerie; Remi N Charrel
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.891

4.  La Crosse virus in Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, Texas, USA, 2009.

Authors:  Amy J Lambert; Carol D Blair; Mary D'Anton; Winnann Ewing; Michelle Harborth; Robyn Seiferth; Jeannie Xiang; Robert S Lanciotti
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Discovery of a unique novel clade of mosquito-associated bunyaviruses.

Authors:  Marco Marklewitz; Florian Zirkel; Innocent B Rwego; Hanna Heidemann; Pascal Trippner; Andreas Kurth; René Kallies; Thomas Briese; W Ian Lipkin; Christian Drosten; Thomas R Gillespie; Sandra Junglen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  The pathology of Rift Valley fever. II. Lesions occurring in field cases in adult cattle, calves and aborted foetuses.

Authors:  J A Coetzer
Journal:  Onderstepoort J Vet Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.792

7.  Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus expands its borders.

Authors:  Ying Wu; George F Gao
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.163

8.  Novel orthobunyavirus in Cattle, Europe, 2011.

Authors:  Bernd Hoffmann; Matthias Scheuch; Dirk Höper; Ralf Jungblut; Mark Holsteg; Horst Schirrmeier; Michael Eschbaumer; Katja V Goller; Kerstin Wernike; Melina Fischer; Angele Breithaupt; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Martin Beer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, South Korea, 2012.

Authors:  Kye-Hyung Kim; Jongyoun Yi; Gayeon Kim; Su Jin Choi; Kang Il Jun; Nak-Hyun Kim; Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Nam-Joong Kim; Jong-Koo Lee; Myoung-don Oh
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: tick-mediated viral disease.

Authors:  Mee Soo Chang; Jun Hee Woo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.153

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Commensal Viruses of Mosquitoes: Host Restriction, Transmission, and Interaction with Arboviral Pathogens.

Authors:  Roy A Hall; Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann; Breeanna J McLean; Caitlin A O'Brien; Agathe M G Colmant; Thisun B H Piyasena; Jessica J Harrison; Natalee D Newton; Ross T Barnard; Natalie A Prow; Joshua M Deerain; Marcus G K Y Mah; Jody Hobson-Peters
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 1.625

2.  Risk analysis of inter-species reassortment through a Rift Valley fever phlebovirus MP-12 vaccine strain.

Authors:  Hoai J Ly; Nandadeva Lokugamage; Shoko Nishiyama; Tetsuro Ikegami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Vertebrate Reservoirs of Arboviruses: Myth, Synonym of Amplifier, or Reality?

Authors:  Goro Kuno; John S Mackenzie; Sandra Junglen; Zdeněk Hubálek; Alexander Plyusnin; Duane J Gubler
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  No Evidence of Gouléako and Herbert Virus Infections in Pigs, Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana.

Authors:  Sandra Junglen; Marco Marklewitz; Florian Zirkel; Robert Wollny; Benjamin Meyer; Hanna Heidemann; Sonja Metzger; Augustina Annan; Dickson Dei; Fabian H Leendertz; Samuel Oppong; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.883

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.