Literature DB >> 25424860

Lightness perception in simple images: testing the anchoring rules.

Ana Radonjić1, Alan L Gilchrist2.   

Abstract

One approach toward understanding how vision computes surface lightness is to first determine what principles govern lightness in simple stimuli and then test whether these hold for more complex stimuli. Gilchrist (2006) proposed that in the simplest images that produce the experience of a surface (two surfaces differing in luminance that fill the entire visual field) lightness can be predicted based on two anchoring rules: the highest luminance rule and the area rule, plus a scale normalization. To test whether these anchoring rules hold when critical features of the stimuli are varied, we probed lightness in simple stimuli, painted onto the inside of hemispheric domes viewed under diffuse lighting. We find that although the highest luminance surface appears nearly white across a large variation in illumination (as predicted by the highest luminance rule), its lightness tends to increase as its luminance increases. This effect is small relative to the size of the overall luminance change. Further, we find that when the darker region fills more than half of the visual field, it appears to lighten with further increases in area but only if it is a single surface. Splitting the dark region into smaller sectors that cover an equal cumulative area diminishes or eliminates the area effect.
© 2014 ARVO.

Keywords:  anchoring; area rule; highest luminance rule; lightness perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25424860      PMCID: PMC4245049          DOI: 10.1167/14.13.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Relative area and relative luminance combine to anchor surface lightness values.

Authors:  X Li; A L Gilchrist
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-07

2.  Color and brightness contrast effects as a function of spatial variables.

Authors:  E W Yund; J C Armington
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The Gelb effect.

Authors:  E C STEWART
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-04

4.  Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances.

Authors:  E G HEINEMANN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-08

5.  Foveal simultaneous contrast as a function of inducing-field area.

Authors:  A L DIAMOND
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-08

6.  Lightness depends on immediately prior experience.

Authors:  Vidal Annan; Alan Gilchrist
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-08

7.  Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors.

Authors:  H WALLACH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-06

8.  Edge integration in achromatic color perception and the lightness-darkness asymmetry.

Authors:  Michael E Rudd
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Lightness, brightness, and anchoring.

Authors:  Barton L Anderson; Michael Whitbread; Chamila de Silva
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Depth effect on lightness revisited: The role of articulation, proximity and fields of illumination.

Authors:  Ana Radonjić; Alan L Gilchrist
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.