| Literature DB >> 25424530 |
Ju Nyeong Park1, Erin Papworth, Serge Clotaire Billong, Jean Bosco Elat, Sethson Kassegne, Ashley Grosso, Laure Moukam, Isaac Macauley, Yves Roger Yomb, Valentin Mondoleba, Jules Eloundou, Matthew LeBreton, Sosthenes Charles Ketende, Stefan Baral.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regular HIV testing is vital for timely linkage to the HIV care continuum and ensuring the success of behavioral and biomedical interventions to prevent HIV acquisition. Men who have sex with men (MSM) are a key population for HIV prevention, treatment, and care efforts globally. This study measures the factors associated with prior HIV testing among MSM in Cameroon.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25424530 PMCID: PMC4258040 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1Prior HIV testing among men who have sex with men recruited in 2011 from Douala (n = 268) and Yaoundé (n = 238) stratified by age group.
HIV testing practices of men who have sex with men (MSM) recruited from Douala (n = 268) and Yaoundé (n = 238), Cameroon 2011
| All | Douala | Yaoundé | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | RDS- weighted % (95% CI) | n (%) | RDS- weighted % (95% CI) | |
| Total | 506 (100) | 268 (100) | - | 238 (100) | - |
| Never tested for HIV | 93 (18.4) | 52 (19.4) | 22.5 (15.7-29.1) | 41 (17.2) | 20.1 (13.8-26.5) |
| Intend to get tested in next 12 months | 88 (95.7) | 49 (94.2) | - | 39 (95.1) | - |
| Ever tested for HIV | 413 (81.6) | 216 (80.6) | 77.5 (70.8-84.3) | 197 (82.8) | 79.9 (73.5-86.2) |
| No. of times tested per two years of being sexually active with other men, median (IQR) | 1.2 (0.5-2.3) | 1.3 (0.6-3) | - | 1 (0.5-2) | - |
| Received test results at last test | 394 (95.4) | 204 (94.9) | 94.3 (89.5-99.1) | 190 (96.9) | 97.6 (95.1-1.00) |
| Disclosed test result to someone | 314 (79.7) | 148 (72.6) | 73.8 (65.9-81.7) | 166 (87.4) | 86.0 (80.5-91.5) |
| Tested in last 12 months | 301 (59.8) | 169 (63.3) | 63.2 (55.0-71.3) | 132 (55.9) | 54.3 (46.0-62.6) |
| Place last tested^ | |||||
| Public hospital or clinic | 162 (40.2) | 66 (32.0) | 31.1 (22.4-39.8) | 96 (48.7) | 47.9 (38.8-57.1) |
| Private hospital or clinic | 71 (17.6) | 30 (14.6) | 13.1 (7.6-18.6) | 41 (20.8) | 25.2 (17.0-33.4) |
| CBO HIV service for MSM | 110 (27.3) | 89 (43.2) | 45.2 (35.9-54.4) | 21 (10.7) | 6.8 (2.8-10.7) |
| Mobile unit or van, university, event, other | 60 (14.9) | 21 (10.2) | 10.6 (5.9-15.3) | 39 (19.8) | 20.1 (12.1-28.0) |
| Advised to get tested by^#: | |||||
| Peer educator | 301 (74.0) | 172 (81.5) | - | 129 (65.8) | - |
| Sexual partner | 46 (11.3) | 17 (8.1) | - | 29 (14.8) | - |
| No-one (myself) | 21 (5.2) | 7 (3.3) | - | 14 (7.1) | - |
| Doctor, nurse, other health professional | 7 (1.7) | 4 (1.9) | - | 3 (1.5) | - |
| Other | 32 (7.9) | 11 (5.2) | - | 21 (10.7) | - |
| Information on HIV testing ever received from^: | |||||
| Radio, television, posters | 142 (27.8) | 58 (21.3) | 26.3 (16.3-36.3) | 84 (35.1) | 34.5 (26.1-42.8) |
| CBO HIV service for MSM | 102 (20.0) | 50 (18.4) | 26.5 (18.0-35.0) | 52 (21.8) | 21.3 (15.7-26.8) |
| Friend | 131 (25.6) | 73 (26.8) | 36.8 (26.0-47.6) | 58 (24.3) | 23.7 (17.8-29.6) |
| Family | 46 (9.0) | 9 (3.3) | 4.3 (1.1-7.5) | 37 (15.5) | 14.4 (9.5-19.3) |
| Doctor or nurse | 33 (6.5) | 19 (7.0) | 6.1 (2.3-10.0) | 14 (5.9) | 4.8 (2.0-7.5) |
| None of these sources | 2 (0.5) | 2 (0.7) | - | 0 (0.0) | - |
^Among ever tested.
#RDS-weighted estimates could not be run due to small cell sizes.
CBO, community-based organization; CI, confidence interval; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; IQR, interquartile range; MSM, men who have sex with men; RDS, respondent-driven sampling.
Willingness to return to a voluntary HIV counseling and testing (HCT) site by testing venue type among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Douala (n = 200) and Yaoundé (n = 174), Cameroon 2011
| Community-based HIV service targeting MSM n (%) | Public hospital n (%) | Private hospital n (%) | Other n (%) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Would return to this HCT site | 87 (98.9) | 52 (82.5) | 23 (79.3) | 15 (75.0) |
|
|
| |||||
| Would return to this HCT site | 18 (100.0) | 79 (90.8) | 29 (82.9) | 29 (85.3) | 0.54 |
^RDS-weighted Pearson’s chi-square test.
Bivariate and multivariate models of the factors associated with HIV testing among MSM in Douala (n = 268), Cameroon 2011
| Ever tested for HIV n (%) | Never tested for HIV n (%) | RDS-weighted OR (95% CI) | RDS-weighted aOR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 216 (80.6) | 52 (19.4) | - | - | - |
| Age (years) | |||||
| 18-29 (per year increase in age) | 178 (79.8) | 45 (20.2) |
| 1.08 (0.95-1.21) | 0.2 |
| ≥30 (per year increase in age) | 38 (84.4) | 7 (15.6) |
| 0.84 (0.68-1.05) | 0.1 |
| Highest level of education attained | |||||
| ≤Secondary | 154 (77.4) | 45 (22.6) | Ref | Ref | - |
| University or technical studies | 62 (89.9) | 7 (10.1) |
|
|
|
| Occupational status | |||||
| Student or apprentice | 92 (80.0) | 23 (20.0) | Ref | - | - |
| Employed | 99 (79.8) | 25 (20.16) | 0.87 (0.42-1.78) | - | - |
| Unemployed | 25 (86.2) | 4 (13.8) | 2.29 (0.69-7.67) | - | - |
| Christian religion1 | 181 (78.4) | 50 (21.7) |
| - | - |
| Sexual orientation: Gay2 | 55 (78.6) | 15 (21.4) | 0.50 (0.24-1.08) | - | - |
| Sexual role preference: Receptive3 | 73 (85.9) | 12 (14.1) | 1.60 (0.71-3.59) | 1.38 (0.60-3.21) | 0.5 |
| Relationship status: Single4 | 179 (79.2) | 47 (20.8) | 0.55 (0.15-2.04) | - | - |
| Ever accessed CBO HIV service for MSM | 172 (86.4) | 27 (13.6) |
|
|
|
| Ever received free condoms | 162 (82.7) | 34 (76.5) | 1.59 (0.74-3.41) | - | - |
|
| |||||
| Any STI symptom | 62 (77.5) | 18 (22.5) | 0.82 (0.39-1.71) | - | - |
| Had male and female sexual partners5 | 66 (82.5) | 14 (17.5) | 1.47 (0.74-2.95) | - | - |
| Number of male partners | |||||
| 1-3 | 129 (76.3) | 40 (23.7) | Ref | Ref | - |
| ≥4 | 87 (87.9) | 12 (12.1) |
|
|
|
| Inconsistent condom use: regular male partner(s) | 103 (83.7) | 20 (16.3) | 1.18 (0.73-1.91) | - | - |
| Inconsistent condom use: casual partner(s) | 77 (78.6) | 21 (21.4) | 0.89 (0.53-1.49) | - | - |
| HIV knowledge composite score, per 20% increase | 85 (15) | 85 (23) | 1.38 (0.85-2.24) | - | - |
| Social support for condom use, composite score, per 20% increase | 63 (50) | 63 (63) | 0.97 (0.75-1.25) | - | - |
1vs. REF Muslim, other, or no religion.
2vs. REF: Bisexual, MSM, straight, other.
3vs. REF: Insertive, versatile or other.
4vs. REF: Married or other.
5vs. REF: Had male partners only in the past 12 months.
All variables listed in this table were considered for inclusion into the multivariate models. The same variables were considered for inclusion in Douala and Yaoundé multivariate models.
Final model did not include condom use variables since they substantially reduced sample size. The HIV knowledge composite (%) was constructed by taking the sum of the number of correct responses to 13 items and converting it to a percentage. The social support for condom use composite (%) was created by dichotomizing each of the 8 items into yes (strongly agree and agree) and no (disagree and strongly disagree) then taking the sum and converting it into a percentage.
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CBO, community-based organization; CI, confidence interval; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; IQR, interquartile range; MSM, men who have sex with men; OR, odds ratio; RDS, respondent-driven sampling; STI, sexually transmitted infection.
Bivariate and multivariate models of the factors associated with HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Yaoundé (n = 238), Cameroon 2011
| Ever tested for HIV n (%) | Never tested for HIV n (%) | RDS-weighted OR (95% CI) | RDS-weighted OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 197 (82.8) | 41 (17.2) | |||
| Age (years) | |||||
| 18–29 (per year increase in age) | 158 (81.0) | 37 (19.0) |
|
|
|
| ≥30 (per year increase in age) | 39 (90.7) | 4 (9.3) |
| 0.81 (0.64-1.03) | 0.09 |
| Highest level of education attained | |||||
| ≤Secondary | 124 (76.1) | 39 (23.9) | Ref | Ref | - |
| University or technical studies | 73 (97.3) | 2 (2.7) |
|
|
|
| Occupational status | |||||
| Student or apprentice | 71 (80.7) | 17 (19.3) | Ref | - | - |
| Employed | 104 (86.0) | 17 (14.1) | 1.43 (0.63-3.28) | - | - |
| Unemployed | 22 (75.9) | 7 (24.1) | 0.71 (0.23-2.20) | - | - |
| Christian religion1 | 185 (84.1) | 35 (15.9) | 1.60 (0.49-5.25) | - | - |
| Sexual orientation: Gay2 | 63 (86.3) | 10 (13.7) | 1.05 (0.44-2.49) | - | - |
| Sexual role preference: Receptive3 | 55 (74.3) | 19 (25.7) | 0.50 (0.23-1.09) | 0.53 (0.21-1.30) | 0.2 |
| Relationship status: Single4 | 157 (80.9) | 37 (19.1) | 0.55 (0.15-2.04) | - | - |
| Ever accessed CBO HIV service for MSM | 88 (88.0) | 12 (12.0) | 1.52 (0.66-3.48) | - | - |
| Ever received free condoms | 138 (86.8) | 21 (13.2) | 1.69 (0.77-3.75) | 1.61 (0.66-3.94) | 0.3 |
|
| |||||
| Any STI symptom | 81 (85.3) | 14 (14.7) | 1.37 (0.62-3.04) | - | - |
| Had male and female sexual partners5 | 91 (82.7) | 19 (17.3) | 0.64 (0.34-1.20) | - | - |
| Number of male partners | |||||
| 1-3 | 106 (80.3) | 26 (19.7) | Ref | - | - |
| ≥4 | 91 (85.9) | 15 (14.2) | 1.51 (0.69-3.31) | - | - |
| Inconsistent condom use: regular male partner(s) | 125 (83.3) | 25 (16.7) | 0.95 (0.56-1.59) | - | - |
| Inconsistent condom use: casual partner(s) | 73 (76.0) | 23 (24.0) | 0.69 (0.45-1.07) | - | - |
| HIV knowledge composite score, per 20% increase | 85 (15) | 77 (15) |
| - | - |
| Social support for condom use, composite score, per 20% increase | 81 (50) | 63 (38) | 0.86 (0.62-1.21) | - | - |
1vs. REF Muslim, other, or no religion.
2vs. REF: Bisexual, MSM, straight, other.
3vs. REF: Insertive, versatile or other.
4vs. REF: Married or other.
5vs. REF: Had male partners only in the past 12 months.
All variables listed in this table were considered for inclusion into the multivariate models. The same variables were considered for inclusion in Douala and Yaoundé multivariate models.
Final model did not include condom use variables since they substantially reduced sample size. The HIV knowledge composite (%) was constructed by taking the sum of the number of correct responses to 13 items and converting it to a percentage. The social support for condom use composite (%) was created by dichotomizing each of the 8 items into yes (strongly agree and agree) and no (disagree and strongly disagree) then taking the sum and converting it into a percentage.
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CBO, community-based organization; CI, confidence interval; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; IQR, interquartile range; MSM, men who have sex with men; OR, odds ratio; RDS, respondent-driven sampling; STI, sexually transmitted infection.