Literature DB >> 25424242

Identification of hospital outliers in bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Connie N Hess1, Sunil V Rao1, Lisa A McCoy1, Megan L Neely1, Mandeep Singh1, John A Spertus1, Ronald J Krone1, W Douglas Weaver1, Eric D Peterson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bleeding complications are an important quality metric. We sought to characterize site-level variation in post-PCI bleeding and explore the influence of patient and procedural factors on hospital bleeding performance. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Hospital-level bleeding performance was compared pre- and postadjustment using the newly revised CathPCI Registry(®) bleeding risk model (c-index, 0.77) among 1292 National Cardiovascular Data Registry(®) hospitals performing >50 PCIs from 7/2009 to 9/2012 (n=1,984,998 procedures). Using random effects models, outlier sites were identified based on 95% confidence intervals around the hospital's random intercept. Bleeding 72 hours post-PCI was defined as: arterial access site, retroperitoneal, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary bleeding; intracranial hemorrhage; cardiac tamponade; nonbypass surgery-related blood transfusion with preprocedure hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL; or absolute decrease in hemoglobin value ≥ 3 g/dL with preprocedure hemoglobin ≤ 16 g/dL. Overall, the median unadjusted post-PCI bleeding rate was 5.2% and varied among hospitals from 2.6% to 10.4% (5th, 95th percentiles). Center-level bleeding variation persisted after case-mix adjustment (2.8%-9.5%; 5th, 95th percentiles). Although hospitals' observed and risk-adjusted bleeding ranks were correlated (Spearman ρ: 0.88), individual rankings shifted after risk-adjustment (median Δ rank order: ± 91.5; interquartile range: 37.0, 185.5). Outlier classification changed postadjustment for 29.3%, 16.1%, and 26.5% of low-, non-, and high-outlier sites, respectively. Hospital use of bleeding avoidance strategies (bivalirudin, radial access, or vascular closure device) was associated with risk-adjusted bleeding rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite adjustment for patient case-mix, there is wide variation in rates of hospital PCI-related bleeding in the United States. Opportunities may exist for best performers to share practices with other sites.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  percutaneous coronary intervention; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25424242      PMCID: PMC4303523          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  33 in total

1.  Accuracy of risk-adjusted mortality rate as a measure of hospital quality of care.

Authors:  J W Thomas; T P Hofer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Association between bleeding, blood transfusion, and costs among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Padma R Kaul; Lawrence Liao; Paul W Armstrong; E Magnus Ohman; Christopher B Granger; Robert M Califf; Robert A Harrington; Eric L Eisenstein; Daniel B Mark
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Shoaib Amlani; Martial Hamon; Salim Yusuf; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling.

Authors:  E R DeLong; E D Peterson; D M DeLong; L H Muhlbaier; S Hackett; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  John W Eikelboom; Shamir R Mehta; Sonia S Anand; Changchun Xie; Keith A A Fox; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeph Herrin; Yongfei Wang; Barbara A Barton; Tashonna R Webster; Jennifer A Mattera; Sarah A Roumanis; Jeptha P Curtis; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; David J Magid; Robert L McNamara; Janet Parkosewich; Jerod M Loeb; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Brent T McLaurin; David A Cox; Michel E Bertrand; A Michael Lincoff; Jeffrey W Moses; Harvey D White; Stuart J Pocock; James H Ware; Frederick Feit; Antonio Colombo; Philip E Aylward; Angel R Cequier; Harald Darius; Walter Desmet; Ramin Ebrahimi; Martial Hamon; Lars H Rasmussen; Hans-Jürgen Rupprecht; James Hoekstra; Roxana Mehran; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Giulio Guagliumi; Jan Z Peruga; Bruce R Brodie; Dariusz Dudek; Ran Kornowski; Franz Hartmann; Bernard J Gersh; Stuart J Pocock; George Dangas; S Chiu Wong; Ajay J Kirtane; Helen Parise; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) Bleeding Score.

Authors:  Sumeet Subherwal; Richard G Bach; Anita Y Chen; Brian F Gage; Sunil V Rao; L Kristin Newby; Tracy Y Wang; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; Matthew T Roe; Charles V Pollack; Eric D Peterson; Karen P Alexander
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Fang-Shu Ou; Tracy Y Wang; Matthew T Roe; Ralph Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.195

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hospital Performance on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process and Outcomes Measures.

Authors:  Philip W Chui; Craig S Parzynski; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Frederick A Masoudi; Harlan M Krumholz; Jeptha P Curtis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Life-threatening subclavian artery bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Fei Shi; Ying Zhang; Li-Xian Sun; Sen Long
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Variation in in-hospital mortality and its association with percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding complications: A report from nationwide registry in Japan.

Authors:  Yuichi Sawayama; Kyohei Yamaji; Shun Kohsaka; Takashi Yamamoto; Yosuke Higo; Yohei Numasawa; Taku Inohara; Hideki Ishii; Tetsuya Amano; Yuji Ikari; Yoshihisa Nakagawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessment of Primary Care Clinician Concordance With Guidelines for Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain in the Veterans Affairs Health System.

Authors:  Paul G Barnett; Josephine C Jacobs; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Roger Chou; Derek Boothroyd; Jeanie Lo; Andrea Nevedal
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.