Literature DB >> 25424151

The DISPARITY-II study: delays to antibiotic administration in women with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Tracy E Madsen1, Anthony M Napoli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early antibiotics reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Recent work demonstrated that women experience greater delays to antibiotic administration, but it is unknown if this relationship remains after adjusting for factors such as source of infection.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to investigate whether gender and/or source of infection are associated with delays to antibiotics in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study in an urban academic emergency department and national Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) database study site. Consecutive patients age 18 years and older admitted to intensive care with severe sepsis or septic shock and entered into the SSC database from October 2005 to March 2012 were included. Two trained research assistants, blinded to the primary outcome, used a standardized abstraction form to obtain patient demographic and clinical data, including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and comorbidities. Time to first antibiotic and presumed source of infection were extracted from the SSC database. Univariate analyses were performed with Pearson chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression was performed with time to first antibiotic as the primary outcome. Covariates, chosen a priori by study authors, included age, race, ethnicity, source of infection, SOFA score, and lactate.
RESULTS: A total of 771 patients were included. Women were 45.3% of the sample, the mean age was 66 years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 65.1 to 67.5 years), 19.4% were nonwhite, and 8% were Hispanic. Mean time to first antibiotic was 153 minutes (95% CI = 143 to 163 minutes) for men and 184 minutes (95% CI = 171 to 197 minutes) for women (p < 0.001). The urinary tract was source of infection for 35.2% of women (95% CI = 30.2% to 40.3%) versus 23.7% (95% CI = 19.6% to 27.8%) of men. Pneumonia was present in 46.9% of men (95% CI = 42.1% to 51.7%) versus 35.8% (95% CI = 30.8% to 40.8%) of women. The mean time to antibiotics in women was longer than in men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.30), even after adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, presumed source of infection, SOFA score, and lactate (p = 0.001). Those with pneumonia compared to other infections received antibiotics faster (aOR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.81). There was no significant association between other sources of infection and time to antibiotics in either univariate or multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Women experience longer delays to initial antibiotics among patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, even after adjusting for infectious source. Pneumonia was associated with shorter times to antibiotic administration. Future research is necessary to investigate contributors to delayed antibiotic administration in women.
© 2014 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25424151     DOI: 10.1111/acem.12546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  13 in total

1.  Physician Variation in Time to Antimicrobial Treatment for Septic Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Ithan D Peltan; Kristina H Mitchell; Kristina E Rudd; Blake A Mann; David J Carlbom; Catherine L Hough; Thomas D Rea; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Comparison of patient characteristics, clinical management, infectious specialist consultation, and outcome in men and women with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective study.

Authors:  E Forsblom; A Kakriainen; E Ruotsalainen; A Järvinen
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Analysis of Race and Time to Antibiotics Among Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock.

Authors:  Tracy E Madsen; Anthony M Napoli
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-08-23

Review 4.  Sex and Gender Differences in Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Sara P Dias; Matthijs C Brouwer; Diederik van de Beek
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Association of Unit Census with Delays in Antimicrobial Initiation among Ward Patients with Hospital-acquired Sepsis.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ginestra; Rachel Kohn; Rebecca A Hubbard; Andrew Crane-Droesch; Scott D Halpern; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Gary E Weissman
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-09

6.  Treatment of bacterial skin infections in ED observation units: factors influencing prescribing practice.

Authors:  John P Haran; Gregory Wu; Vanni Bucci; Andrew Fischer; Edward W Boyer; Patricia L Hibberd
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Established evidence-based treatment guidelines help mitigate disparities in quality of emergency care.

Authors:  Stacy A Trent; Nigel George; Edward P Havranek; Adit A Ginde; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 8.  Sex and bacterial infectious diseases.

Authors:  J-L Mege; F Bretelle; M Leone
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2018-06-06

9.  Association between site of infection and in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis admitted to emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Medellin, Colombia.

Authors:  César Caraballo; Johana Ascuntar; Carolina Hincapié; Camilo Restrepo; Elisa Bernal; Fabián Jaimes
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Algorithmic prognostication in critical care: a promising but unproven technology for supporting difficult decisions.

Authors:  Gary E Weissman; Vincent X Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.