Literature DB >> 25423539

Implementation of a surgical intensive care unit service is associated with improved outcomes for trauma patients.

Amanda L Klein1, Carlos V R Brown, Jayson Aydelotte, Sadia Ali, Adam Clark, Ben Coopwood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our trauma service recently transitioned from a pulmonary intensive care unit (ICU) service to a surgical ICU (SICU) service. We hypothesized that a newly formed SICU service could provide comparable outcomes to the existing pulmonary ICU service. A specific aim of this study was to compare outcomes of trauma patients admitted to the ICU before and after implementation of a SICU service.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of trauma patients admitted to the ICU of our urban, American College of Surgeons- verified, Level 1 trauma center during a 4-year period (2009-2012). Patients managed by the pulmonary ICU service (2009-2010) were compared with patients managed by a SICU service (2011-2012). The primary outcome was mortality, while secondary outcomes included complications (pulmonary, infectious, cardiac, and thromboembolic), hospital and ICU length of stay, ventilator days, and need for reintubation.
RESULTS: There were 2,253 trauma patients admitted to the ICU during the study period, 1,124 and 1,129 managed by the pulmonary ICU and SICU services, respectively. When comparing outcomes for SICU and pulmonary ICU patients, there was no difference in mortality (11% vs. 13%, p = 0.41), but patients managed by the SICU service had fewer pulmonary complications (3% vs. 6%, p < 0.001), fewer days on the ventilator (3 vs. 4, p = 0.002), and less often required reintubation after extubation (4% vs. 9%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Transition from a pulmonary ICU service to a SICU service at our institution was associated with no change in mortality but an improvement in pulmonary complications, ventilator days, and reintubation rates. Trauma centers currently staffed with a pulmonary ICU service should feel comfortable converting to SICU service and should expect comparable or improved outcomes for trauma patients admitted to the ICU. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25423539     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  4 in total

1.  Neuro, trauma, or med/surg intensive care unit: Does it matter where multiple injuries patients with traumatic brain injury are admitted? Secondary analysis of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Committee decompressive craniectomy study.

Authors:  Sarah Lombardo; Thomas Scalea; Jason Sperry; Raul Coimbra; Gary Vercruysse; Toby Enniss; Gregory J Jurkovich; Raminder Nirula
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Validation of the trauma mortality prediction scores from a Malaysian population.

Authors:  Jih Huei Tan; Henry Chor Lip Tan; Nur Azlin Md Noh; Yuzaidi Mohamad; Rizal Imran Alwi
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-12-22

3.  Trauma ICU Prevalence Project: the diversity of surgical critical care.

Authors:  Christopher P Michetti; Samir M Fakhry; Karen Brasel; Niels D Martin; Erik J Teicher; Anna Newcomb
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2019-02-18

4.  Risk factors for extubation failure at a level I trauma center: does the specialty of the intensivist matter?

Authors:  Jordan A Weinberg; Lily R Stevens; Pamela W Goslar; Terrell M Thompson; Jessica L Sanford; Scott R Petersen
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2016-12-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.