A duplexed, functional multiaddition high throughput screen and subsequent iterative parallel synthesis effort identified the first highly selective and CNS penetrant glucagon-like peptide-1R (GLP-1R) positive allosteric modulator (PAM). PAM (S)-9b potentiated low-dose exenatide to augment insulin secretion in primary mouse pancreatic islets, and (S)-9b alone was effective in potentiating endogenous GLP-1R to reverse haloperidol-induced catalepsy.
A duplexed, functional multiaddition high throughput screen and subsequent iterative parallel synthesis effort identified the first highly selective and CNS penetrant glucagon-like peptide-1R (GLP-1R) positive allosteric modulator (PAM). PAM (S)-9b potentiated low-dose exenatide to augment insulin secretion in primary mouse pancreatic islets, and (S)-9b alone was effective in potentiating endogenous GLP-1R to reverse haloperidol-induced catalepsy.
Glucagon-like peptide-1
(GLP-1) is a key incretin hormone with
diverse physiological functions in both the periphery and central
nervous system (CNS) that are mediated by the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R),
a family B G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR).[1−3] GLP-1R is activated
by four endogenous GLP-1 peptides (GLP-1 (1–37), GLP-1 (7–37),
GLP(1–36)NH2, and GLP-1 (7–36)NH2) and a fifth structurally analogous peptide oxyntomodulin.[4,5] Due to its key role in the potentiation of insulin secretion and
suppression of glucagon scretion, GLP-1R is a major focus of therapeutic
discovery for type II diabetes, and several peptide-based drugs have
been developed, including exenatide, 1, and liragulitide, 2, administered by subcutaneous injection.[6−10] In the CNS, GLP-1R is important for neuroprotection,
learning, and memory as well as neurogenesis.[11,12] While these synthetic peptides overcome the short half-life of endogenous
GLP-1, adverse events (e.g., nausea and GI distress) contribute to
relatively poor long-term adherence.[4−10] Recently, efforts have been directed toward the development of orally
bioavailable, nonpeptide approaches, particularly small-molecule positive
allosteric modulators (PAMs), for which several chemotypes 3–7 have been reported (Figure 1).[13−18] While allosteric modulation[19,20] is an attractive approach
for GLP-1R modulation, these early PAM tool compounds suffer from
weak potency and/or efficacy, ligand and/or stimulus bias[13−20] as well as innate electrophilicity (2 covalently modifies
GLP-1R).[21,22] Thus, we decided to pursue the discovery
of novel GLP-1R PAMs to enable the in vitro and in vivo assessment
of the therapeutic potential of GLP-1 potentiation in the periphery,
and importantly, the CNS, for which no CNS penetrant GLP-1R PAMs have
been reported.
Figure 1
Structures 3–7 of reported
GLP-1
PAMs and ago-PAMs. All known GLP-1 PAMs have noatble limitations in
assessing the GLP-1 potentiation mechanism in the periphery and CNS.
Structures 3–7 of reported
GLP-1
PAMs and ago-PAMs. All known GLP-1 PAMs have noatble limitations in
assessing the GLP-1 potentiation mechanism in the periphery and CNS.
Results and Discussion
High-Throughput Screen
We performed a duplexed (GLP-1R
and glucagon receptor (GR)) triple-add, functional high-throughput
screen to identify GLP-1R PAM and glucagon PAM leads.[18] For this effort, we screened our internal collection (175478
compounds) in humanGLP-1R9-3-H cells measuring intracellular calcium
mobilization as well as a secondary GloSensor cAMP assay because both
read-outs are GLP-1R primary coupling pathways which identified 98
primary hits.[18] PAMs and ago-PAMs active
in both calcium and cAMP assays, that were devoid of activity at the
GR, as well as in a counter-screen against the melanocortin 4 receptor
(MC4R), were further profiled as putative GLP-1R PAM leads.[18]
Chemistry
Of the confirmed hits
(Figure 2), our attention focused on 8, an intriguing
racemic 1-oxo-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole-4-amide scaffold, which was active in both primary assays
(GLP-1R EC50 = 4.1 μM, pEC50 = 5.38 ±
0.13, GLP-1R% max = 58.9 ± 2.3) and inactive at GR and MC4R with
good physiochemical properties (MW = 434, clogP = 3.7). Following
the route shown in Scheme 1, we synthesized
the single enantiomers (S)-8 (GLP-1R
EC50 = 2.4 μM, pEC50 = 5.69 ± 0.12,
GLP-1R% max = 53.4 ± 2.03) and (R)-8 (GLP-1R EC50 >10 μM) and found that all the activity
resided in the (S)-8 enantiomer.[23] Commercial acid 9 was coupled to
either (S)- or (R)-tert-butyl-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1 carboxylate to provide 10. Deprotection of the Boc moiety under acidic conditions
delivered 11, which underwent a subsequent reductive
amination reaction with acetaldehyde to give (S)-
and (R)-8 in 62–68% overall yield
for the three step sequence. (S)-8 afforded
no calcium response in the absence of GLP-1 but potentiated an EC20 concentration of GLP-1 and had no effect on GR (GLP-1R EC50 = 2.4 μM, pEC50 = 5.69 ± 0.12, GLP-1R%
max = 53.4 ± 2.0) and (R)-8 (GLP-1R
EC50 >10 μM) (Figure 2B).
In a standard fold-shift experiment, (S)-8 induced a modest ∼2-fold shift of the GLP-1 concentration–response
curve (CRC), and increased the GLP-1%max (from 100.3 to 129.6).[19,20,23]
Figure 2
Structures and pharmacology of GLP-1R
PAMs. (A) Structures of 8 and (S)-8. (B) PAM CRCs for
(S)-8 in the presence of an EC20 concentration of either GLP-1 or glucagon.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of (S)- and (R)-8 and Route for Analogue Synthesis
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
HATU, DIEA, DMF, (S)- or (R)-tert-butyl-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1 carboxylate, 82–85%;
(b) 4 M HCl in dioxane, DCM, 99%; (c) acetaldehyde, NaBH(OAc)3, DCM, 81–83%.
Structures and pharmacology of GLP-1R
PAMs. (A) Structures of 8 and (S)-8. (B) PAM CRCs for
(S)-8 in the presence of an EC20 concentration of either GLP-1 or glucagon.
Synthesis of (S)- and (R)-8 and Route for Analogue Synthesis
Reagents
and conditions: (a)
HATU, DIEA, DMF, (S)- or (R)-tert-butyl-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1 carboxylate, 82–85%;
(b) 4 M HCl in dioxane, DCM, 99%; (c) acetaldehyde, NaBH(OAc)3, DCM, 81–83%.Preliminary
DMPK evaluation of (S)-8 demonstrated
a clean P450 inhibition profile (1A2, 2C9, 2D6 IC50s >20
μM; 3A4 IC50 = 3.2 μM), good
plasma free fraction (fu >10% in rat
and
human), but high liver microsome-predicted clearance (rat CLhep = 69 mL/min/kg) and in vivo clearance (92 mL/min/kg) due to N-dealkylation of the N-ethyl pyrrolidine
and oxidation of the N-cylopentyl moiety.[23] Nevertheless, (S)-8 afforded an ∼1.5-fold potentiation of glucose-stimulated
insulin secretion in primary mouse islets in the presence of 2.[23,24] Encouraged by these early data,
we initiated an analogue library effort to evaluate SAR following
the route described in Scheme 1. SAR proved
to be steep. Replacement of the N-cylcopentyl moiety
of (S)-8 with N-Me, N-isobutyl led to inactive compounds (GLP-1 EC50s >10 μM), as did deletion of the indole N-Me. Due to the rapid N-dealkylation of the N-ethyl pyrrolidine, we surveyed a broader diversity of
amide congeners, but all proved to be devoid of GLP-1R PAM activity.
Finally, we elected to survey alternative N-alkyl
pyrrolidines 9 (Table 1) following
the route depicted in Scheme 1. This effort
identified pure PAMs ((S)-9c-e) as well as ago-PAMs ((S)-9b), but
once again, little structural diversity was tolerated. In general,
these were low efficacy PAMs (48–68% GLP-1 max), but (S)-9b, (S)-2-cyclopentyl-N-((1-isopropylpyrrolidin2-yl)-9-methyl-1-oxo-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyrrido[3,4-b]indole-4-carboxamide, appeared
worthy of further inspection (GLP-1 EC50 = 1.3 μM,
59.2% GLP-1 max).
Table 1
Structure and Activities of Analogues 9
entry
R
GLP-1R EC50 (μM)
GLP-1R pEC50a
GLP-1R maxa (%)
(S)-8
Et
2.4
5.69 ± 0.12
53.4 ± 2.03
(S)-9a
n-Pr
6.5
5.18 ± 0.13
48.4 ± 2.77
(S)-9b
i-Pr
1.3
5.88 ± 0.15
59.2 ± 2.53
(S)-9c
2-OMeBn
12.1
4.92 ± 0.09
68.3 ± 3.31
(S)-9d
n-hexyl
10.3
4.99 ± 0.09
55.7 ± 2.63
(S)-9e
CH2CH2Ph
14.1
4.74 ± 0.19
68.5 ± 7.96
GLP-1 pEC50 and GLP-1
max data reported as averages + SEM from our calcium mobilization
assay; n = 3.
GLP-1 pEC50 and GLP-1
max data reported as averages + SEM from our calcium mobilization
assay; n = 3.
Molecular Pharmacology
Again, SAR was driven on humanGLP-1R9-3-H cells measuring intracellular calcium mobilization in
response to an EC20 concentration of GLP-1.[18,23] This proved challenging due to the relative instability and short
half-life of endogenous GLP-1 in cells and in vivo. Still, it was
important to identify PAMs that could potentiate the endogenous peptide,
as other reported PAMs displayed ligand bias and diminished activity
at native GLP-1. To expand the utility of (S)-9b, we evaluated its propensity for ligand bias by assessing
its ability to potentiate subthreshold concentrations (∼EC20s) of native GLP-1 and the synthetic peptide agonists exenatide, 1, and liragulitide, 2 (Figure 3). Here, (S)-9b, an ago-PAM
(direct activation of GLP-1 at higher concentrations, e.g., ∼20%
max efficacy at 30 μM) robustly potentiates both GLP-1 and synthetic
peptide 1. In fact, (S)-9b was more efficacious with 1 than GLP-1, while liragulitide
was less efficacious and the CRC did not plateau at 30 μM. Overall,
these findings reveal potentiation across three ligands, suggesting
a lack of substantial ligand bias. As with (S)-8, the maximum fold-shift of the GLP-1 CRC was 1.6-fold at
30 μM, but the efficacy increased from 100% to 140%.
Figure 3
Molecular pharmacology
of (S)-9b.
(A) CRC of (S)-9b in the presence and
absence of an EC20 of GLP-1 (EC50 = 1.8 μM,
pEC50 = 5.74 ± 0.2, 59.2 ± 2% GLP-1 max). (B)
CRC of (S)-9b in the presence and absence
of an EC20 of 1 (EC50 = 8.4 μM,
pEC50 = 5.07 ± 0.3, 71.5 ± 5% 1 max).
(C) CRC of (S)-9b in the presence and
absence of an EC20 of 2 (EC50 =
30 μM, pEC50 = 4.5 ± 0.2, 59.2 ± 1% 1 max). (D) Fold-shift experiment of GLP-1 in the presence
of increasing concentrations of (S)-9b, with a maximum fold-shift of 1.6-fold at 20 μM.
Molecular pharmacology
of (S)-9b.
(A) CRC of (S)-9b in the presence and
absence of an EC20 of GLP-1 (EC50 = 1.8 μM,
pEC50 = 5.74 ± 0.2, 59.2 ± 2% GLP-1 max). (B)
CRC of (S)-9b in the presence and absence
of an EC20 of 1 (EC50 = 8.4 μM,
pEC50 = 5.07 ± 0.3, 71.5 ± 5% 1 max).
(C) CRC of (S)-9b in the presence and
absence of an EC20 of 2 (EC50 =
30 μM, pEC50 = 4.5 ± 0.2, 59.2 ± 1% 1 max). (D) Fold-shift experiment of GLP-1 in the presence
of increasing concentrations of (S)-9b, with a maximum fold-shift of 1.6-fold at 20 μM.β-Arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization
molecular
pharmacology of (S)-9b. Fold shift experiment
of liraglutide in the presence of 5, 10, and 20 μM (S)-9b on the recruitment of β-arrestin
(A) and GLP-1 receptor internalization (B) using the PathHunter Express
DiscoveRx assay platform. Efficacy of receptor internalization was
increased by 2.26-fold at 20 μM, while there was little to no
effect on β-arrestin recruitment. Data are normalized to the
maximal response of liraglutide alone and fit to a four-parameter
logistic equation with variable slope. Values are expressed as mean
± SEM, n = 3.[23]On the basis of observations with
previously reported GLP-1R PAMs 3–5,[14,15] we also evaluated
the pharmacological response of (S)-9b on β-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization (Figure 4) by potentiation of liragulitide, 2. Very weak impact on β-arrestin recruitment was noted, along
with a more significant effect on GLP-1 receptor internalization.
These findings were in agreement with those reported with 3–6.[14,15]
Figure 4
β-Arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization
molecular
pharmacology of (S)-9b. Fold shift experiment
of liraglutide in the presence of 5, 10, and 20 μM (S)-9b on the recruitment of β-arrestin
(A) and GLP-1 receptor internalization (B) using the PathHunter Express
DiscoveRx assay platform. Efficacy of receptor internalization was
increased by 2.26-fold at 20 μM, while there was little to no
effect on β-arrestin recruitment. Data are normalized to the
maximal response of liraglutide alone and fit to a four-parameter
logistic equation with variable slope. Values are expressed as mean
± SEM, n = 3.[23]
Peptide agonist 1 has been shown to potentiate glucose-induced
insulin secretion in primary mouse pancreatic islets, and, based on
the ability of (S)-9b to potentiate 1, we wanted to determine if (S)-9b could potentiate the effects of low dose 1 under low
and high glucose conditions. As shown in Figure 5, in the presence of 1, (S)-9b significantly increased insulin secretion beyond that of either
glucose alone or glucose and 1.[23,24]
Figure 5
Measurement of the
effect of 30 μM (S)-9b on potentiation
of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion
in primary mouse islets in the presence of 10 nM 1.[23,24] Islets were isolated from C57BL/6 male mice, size-matched into wells
of a 12-well plate, and treated with vehicle, exendin-4, or exendin-4
+ (S)-9b at both low (5.6 mM) and high
(11 mM) glucose for 60 min. n = 3. Data are represented
as mean insulin response ± SEM per 100 islet equivalents and
analyzed using 2-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons
test. **p < 0.01, ****p <
0.0001.
Measurement of the
effect of 30 μM (S)-9b on potentiation
of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion
in primary mouse islets in the presence of 10 nM 1.[23,24] Islets were isolated from C57BL/6 male mice, size-matched into wells
of a 12-well plate, and treated with vehicle, exendin-4, or exendin-4
+ (S)-9b at both low (5.6 mM) and high
(11 mM) glucose for 60 min. n = 3. Data are represented
as mean insulin response ± SEM per 100 islet equivalents and
analyzed using 2-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons
test. **p < 0.01, ****p <
0.0001.
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Having achieved efficacy
in primary tissue, we next evaluated the DMPK profile of (S)-9b to assess its potential as an in vivo
tool (Table 2).[23] (S)-9b, like (S)-8, displays an elevated plasma clearance (CLp,
72 mL/min/kg) that approaches hepatic blood flow in male Sprague–Dawley
rats. Coupled with a high volume of distribution predicted at steady-state
(Vss, 4.0 L/kg), (S)-9b produced a half-life (t1/2)
of approximately 1 h in vivo (Table 2). Importantly,
(S)-9b was found to possess CNS permeability
(Kp, 2.7, Kp,uu, 0.25), a first among reported GLP-1 PAMs, although a Kp,uu < 1 did indicate a lack of true equilibrium at
the Tmax of 0.5 h. The elevated clearance
and poor associated oral bioavailability (F, <1%,
observed for (S)-9b in rat was consistent
with the predicted hepatic clearance (Table 2). Rat and human liver microsome incubations revealed the principal
routes of biotransformation for (S)-9b to be cyclopentyl oxidation and oxidative N-dealkylation
of the pyrrolidine moiety, respectively. The propensity of (S)-9b to mediate a P450 drug–drug interaction
(DDI) was assessed in an in vitro cassette microsome inhibition assay
of 1A2, 2C9, 2D6, and 3A4. The results of the inhibition screen indicated
(S)-9b to possess low risk of mediating
a DDI, displaying micromolar IC50 values against these
P450 enzymes (Table 2). While oral delivery
of this agent is limiting, intraperitoneal dosing readily enables
in vivo work to be performed. To assess ancillary pharmacology, and
to ensure that in vivo activity was due to potentiation of GLP-1,
(S)-9b was profiled in a Eurofin radioligand
binding panel of 68 GPCRs, ion channels, and transporters at a concentration
of 10 μM, which revealed no significant off-target activity
(no inhibition >50%@10 μM, i.e, Kis >10 μM).[23]
Table 2
DMPK Profile of (S)-9b
parameter
(S)-9b
MW
434.28
TPSA
59.7
cLogP
3.51
Liver microsome
clearance was predicted
using the well-stirred model with 20 and 45 g liver per kg body weight
and 21 and 70 mL/kg hepatic blood flow for human and rat, respectively.
Liver microsome
clearance was predicted
using the well-stirred model with 20 and 45 g liver per kg body weight
and 21 and 70 mL/kg hepatic blood flow for human and rat, respectively.
Behavioral Pharmacology
In numerous preclinical studies
models of Parkinson’s disease, 1 reverses key
deficits and arrests progression;[9,11,25,26] additionally, the peptide
agonist is neuroprotective and neurorestorative in 6-OHDArats.[25] In a recent clinical trial with 1 (despite very low and variable CNS exposure), 1 improved
both cognition and motor symptoms.[26] We
and others routinely employ haloperidol-induced catalepsy (HIC) as
a first tier pharmacodynamic assay to assess potential symptomatic
benefit for novel anti-Parkinsonian mechanisms.[27] Interestingly, neither GLP-1 agonists, such as 1 or 2, or PAMs have been evaluated in this preclinical
model of the motor symptoms of PD. We determined the ability of (S)-9b to reverse the cataleptic state induced
by haloperidol; these studies were performed in comparison to a positive
control, the A2A antagonist preladenant.[27] We tested both 10 and 30 mg/kg doses, administered ip,
for their ability to reverse the catalepsy induced by two doses of
haloperidol, a screening dose of 0.75 mg/kg, and a more robust challenge
at 1.5 mg/kg (Figure 6). Excitingly, at the
lower challenge of 0.75 mg/kg haloperidol, statistically significant
reversal in catalepsy was noted at both the 10 mg/kg (36.3% reversal)
and 30 mg/kg (50.4% reversal) doses. For the 1.5 mg/kg dose of haloperidol,
the same trend is noted, but significance is only achieved at the
30 mg/kg dose (36.6% reversal); data for the A2A antagonist
preladenant is shown for comparison (62% reversal). In satellite animals,
the 10 mg/kg dose afforded brain levels of 481 nM, below the GLP-1
PAM EC50 value of (S)-9b;
however, the EC50 is based on an EC20 concentration
of GLP-1. We do not known the GLP-1 tone in the CNS or the central
concentration of the other three peptidic forms of GLP-1 or oxyntomodulin;
thus, the potency and efficacy of GLP-1 potentiation by (S)-9b could be significantly higher in vivo. Moreover,
the absolute CNS concentration 1 is low in both preclinical
species as well as humans, despite displaying robust efficacy, perhaps
speaking to high receptor reserve of GLP-1 in the CNS. To further
eliminate nonmechanism based efficacy in this model, we performed
a spontaneous locomotor activity assay and noted no effect on locomotion
or sedative effects; coupled with the clean ancillary pharmacology
in the Eurofins panel, it is reasonable to assume the efficacy is
due to potentiation of GLP-1.[23] Thus, the
GLP-1R ago-PAM (S)-9b is the first example
of GLP-1R activation displaying efficacy in a haloperidol-induced
catalepsy model, and importantly, (S)-9b is efficacious by potentiation of endogenous GLP-1 as opposed to
potentiation of exogenously administered 1 or 2.
Figure 6
GLP-1R ago-PAM (S)-9b produces a
dose-dependent reversal of haloperidol induced catalepsy in rats.
(A) (S)-9b at doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg
ip (10% Tween 80) significantly reverse a 0.75 mg/kg ip dose of haloperdiol.
(B) (S)-9b at doses of 30 mg/kg ip significantly
reverse a 1.5 mg/kg ip dose of haloperidol and the clinically validated
A2A antagonist preladenant is shown for comparison. Catalepsy
was measured as the latency to withdraw the forepaws from a horizontal
bar with a cutoff of 30 s. Vertical bars represent the means ±
SEM of 10–12 rats/treatment group. *p <
0.0001 vs vehicle by Dunnett’s test.
GLP-1R ago-PAM (S)-9b produces a
dose-dependent reversal of haloperidol induced catalepsy in rats.
(A) (S)-9b at doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg
ip (10% Tween 80) significantly reverse a 0.75 mg/kg ip dose of haloperdiol.
(B) (S)-9b at doses of 30 mg/kg ip significantly
reverse a 1.5 mg/kg ip dose of haloperidol and the clinically validated
A2A antagonist preladenant is shown for comparison. Catalepsy
was measured as the latency to withdraw the forepaws from a horizontal
bar with a cutoff of 30 s. Vertical bars represent the means ±
SEM of 10–12 rats/treatment group. *p <
0.0001 vs vehicle by Dunnett’s test.
Conclusion
In summary, we have developed a novel, CNS-penetrant
GLP-1 ago-PAM
(S)-9b, VU0453379, wherein enantiospecific
GLP-1 PAM activity was noted, with all activity residing in the (S)-enantiomer. This new chemotype was devoid of ligand bias,
potentiating endogenous GLP-1 as well as synthetic peptide agonists 1 and 2. Favorable physiochemical properties
and a good disposition profile enabled efficacy in native tissues,
potentiating low dose 1 insulin secretion in primary
mouse islets and recapitulating, via the PAM mechanism, efficacy in
a preclinical PD model and highlighting PD as an exciting therapeutic
target for GLP-1R PAMs. While data with (S)-9b is very encouraging, current efforts are focused on further
improving both GLP-1R PAM potency and DMPK profile, while further
dissecting the molecular pharmacology of GLP-1 PAMs and better understanding
PK/PD relationships. These studies are in progress and will be reported
in due course.
Experimental Section
Chemistry. All compounds were purified to ≥95% as determined
by analytical LCMS (214 nm, 254 nm and ELSD) as well as 1H NMR. The general chemistry, experimental information, and syntheses
of all other compounds are supplied in the Supporting
Information.
To a round-bottom flask was
added at room temperature (S)-2-cyclopentyl-9-methyl-1-oxo-N-(pyrrolidin-2-ylmethyl)-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole-4-carboxamide (200 mg, 0.51
mmol) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (4 mL) and dry acetone
(100 μL). The resultant mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 5 min before adding sodium triacetoxyborohydride (150 mg, 0.71
mmol), at which point the mixture was stirred an additional 4 h. Upon
completion by LC/MS, the reaction was quenched with sodium bicarbonate
(5 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined
organic layers were dried by passage through a phase separator and
concentrated in vacuo. The orange residue was taken up in dimethyl
sulfoxide and purified via reverse-phase preparative HPLC using acetonitrile
in water with 0.5% NH4OH added to elute. Pure fractions
were pooled and concentrated to dryness in vacuo to afford desired
product as a foamy yellow solid in 73% yield. Specific rotation [α](23)/D = −20.6° (c = 1.0, MeOH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 8.32 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.37
(m, 1H), 7.24–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.08 (m, 1H), 5.47–5.43
(m, 1H), 4.24 (s, 3H), 3.74–3.68 (m, 1H), 3.38–3.32
(m, 1H), 3.12–3.07 (m, 1H), 3.02–2.95 (m, 1H), 2.94–2.89
(m, 1H), 2.57–2.51 (m, 1H), 2.25–2.22 (m, 2H), 1.96–1.81
(m, 3H) 1.81–1.67 (m, 7H), 1.12 (d, J = 6.6
Hz, 3H), 1.02 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H). 13C
NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 166.93, 156.23, 141.05, 126.54,
126.47, 124.77, 124.06, 120.09, 119.92, 113.34, 109.64, 58.17, 55.52,
49.70, 47.36, 42.47, 32.35, 32.32, 31.05, 29.06, 24.41, 23.48, 22.23,
16.24. HRMS (TOF, ES+) calcd for C26H35N4O2 (M + 1), 435.5915; found, 435.5917.
Authors: Bruce J Melancon; Corey R Hopkins; Michael R Wood; Kyle A Emmitte; Colleen M Niswender; Arthur Christopoulos; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Francis S Willard; Denise Wootten; Aaron D Showalter; Emilia E Savage; James Ficorilli; Thomas B Farb; Krister Bokvist; Jorge Alsina-Fernandez; Sebastian G B Furness; Arthur Christopoulos; Patrick M Sexton; Kyle W Sloop Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Carrie K Jones; Michael Bubser; Analisa D Thompson; Jonathan W Dickerson; Nathalie Turle-Lorenzo; Marianne Amalric; Anna L Blobaum; Thomas M Bridges; Ryan D Morrison; Satyawan Jadhav; Darren W Engers; Kimberly Italiano; Jacob Bode; J Scott Daniels; Craig W Lindsley; Corey R Hopkins; P Jeffrey Conn; Colleen M Niswender Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Lindsey C Morris; Emily L Days; Maxine Turney; Dehui Mi; Craig W Lindsley; C David Weaver; Kevin D Niswender Journal: J Biomol Screen Date: 2014-02-13
Authors: Cassandra Koole; Kavita Pabreja; Emilia E Savage; Denise Wootten; Sebastian G B Furness; Laurence J Miller; Arthur Christopoulos; Patrick M Sexton Journal: Biochem Soc Trans Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 5.407
Authors: TracyAnn Perry; Norman J Haughey; Mark P Mattson; Josephine M Egan; Nigel H Greig Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Pedro M Garcia-Barrantes; Hyekyung P Cho; Colleen M Niswender; Frank W Byers; Charles W Locuson; Anna L Blobaum; Zixiu Xiang; Jerri M Rook; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Craig W Lindsley; Kyle A Emmitte; Corey R Hopkins; Thomas M Bridges; Karen J Gregory; Colleen M Niswender; P Jeffrey Conn Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Daniela G Dengler; Kaleeckal G Harikumar; Sirkku Pollari; Qing Sun; Brock T Brown; Aki Shinoki-Iwaya; Robert Ardecky; Laurence J Miller; Eduard A Sergienko Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Daniela G Dengler; Qing Sun; John Holleran; Sirkku Pollari; Jannis Beutel; Brock T Brown; Aki Shinoki Iwaya; Robert Ardecky; Kaleeckal G Harikumar; Laurence J Miller; Eduard A Sergienko Journal: SLAS Discov Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 3.341
Authors: Ana B Bueno; Aaron D Showalter; David B Wainscott; Cynthia Stutsman; Aranzazu Marín; James Ficorilli; Over Cabrera; Francis S Willard; Kyle W Sloop Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 5.157